Comparison and selection of experiment designs

ABSTRACT

An apparatus may include a processor caused to: receive indications of first and second experiment designs to be compared; for each factor of the model of the first experiment design, identify a matching factor of the model of the second experiment design based on factor type, wherein the factor type is selected from the group consisting of a categorical factor and a continuous factor; for each categorical factor of the model of the first experiment design, identify a matching factor of the model of the second experiment design additionally based on quantity of levels of each factor; for each term of the model of the first experiment design, identify a matching term of the model of the second experiment design based on an order of each term; and present, on a display, the identified matches between the terms and between the responses of the first and second experiment designs.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e)to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/381,290 filed Aug. 30, 2016,and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/381,303 also filed Aug. 30,2016, the entirety of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

It has become increasingly commonplace to use experiment designs as atool to derive models of complex systems in an effort to identify inputs(commonly referred to as “factors”) that explain observed outputs(commonly referred to as “responses”), especially where there is a needto change undesired responses. However, the derivation of a model thatprovides an understanding of a complex system that is sufficient toexplain a linkage between particular factors and particular responses isoften a time-consuming task, since each particular type of model istypically closely associated with a particular type of experimentdesign. Thus, it is often necessary to suffer through a wastefultrial-and-error process in which best efforts to select a type of modelthat is believed to be capable of providing such a sufficientunderstanding of a system leads to a choice of experiment design that islater found to be undesirably ineffective in illuminating a linkagebetween particular factors and particular responses. Thus, there may bemultiple iterations of selection of a type of model followed by therevelation of the need to make another selection only after anexpenditure of considerable time to perform the associated type ofexperiment design.

Even after the identification of a type of model and associated type ofexperiment design that at least appears to be sufficiently capable ofilluminating a linkage between particular factors and responses,additional considerable time may be consumed in iteratively derivingcoefficients of the model and/or other parameters of the associatedexperiment design to derive a sufficiently useful model. Also, practicallimitations of cost, availability of materials and/or available time mayimpose the need to perform the associated experiment design in a lessthan technically ideal manner, and such impositions may need to be takeninto account in deriving the model.

SUMMARY

This summary is not intended to identify only key or essential featuresof the described subject matter, nor is it intended to be used inisolation to determine the scope of the described subject matter. Thesubject matter should be understood by reference to appropriate portionsof the entire specification of this patent, any or all drawings, andeach claim.

An apparatus may include a processor and a storage to store instructionsthat, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to performoperations including receive, from an input device communicativelycoupled to the processor, indications of selection of a plurality ofexperiment designs to be compared, wherein: each experiment design ofthe plurality of experiment designs specifies a quantity of runs of atest to perform a designed experiment; each experiment design isassociated with a model of a system under evaluation; the modelassociated with each experiment design comprises multiple terms asinputs to the model; each term comprises at least one factor of multiplefactors that are each an input to the system; each factor of themultiple factors is identified by a factor identifier; and each term ofthe multiple terms is identified by a term identifier comprising text.For each factor of the multiple factors of the model associated with afirst experiment design of the plurality of designs, the processor maybe further caused to identify a matching factor of the multiple factorsof the model associated with a second experiment design of the pluralityof designs based on a factor type of each factor, wherein the factortype is selected from the group consisting of a categorical factor and acontinuous factor. For each categorical factor of the multiple factorsof the model associated with the first experiment design, the processormay be further caused to identify a matching factor of the multiplefactors of the model associated with the second experiment designadditionally based on quantity of levels of each factor. For each termof the multiple terms of the model associated with the first experimentdesign, the processor may be further caused to identify a matching termof the multiple terms of the model associated with the second experimentdesign based on an order of each term. The processor may be furthercaused to present, on a display communicatively coupled to theprocessor, the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs and the identified matches betweenthe multiple responses of the first and second experiment designs.

The order of each term of the first and second experiment designs may beselected from a group consisting of a first order main effect term, asecond order term, and a third order term. The processor may be causedto perform operations including: monitor the input device to enablereception of input that indicates a correction to the identified matchesbetween the multiple terms of the first and second experiment designs;analyze the indicated correction to determine whether the indicatedcorrection specifies a match between terms of dissimilar order; and inresponse to a determination that the indicated correction specifies amatch between terms of dissimilar order, present an indication ofincorrect input on the display.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including identify amatch between a categorical factor of the model associated with thefirst experiment design and a categorical factor of the model associatedwith the second experiment design additionally based on matches betweenthe levels. The processor may be caused to perform operations includingidentify a match between a continuous factor of the model associatedwith the first experiment design and a continuous factor of the modelassociated with the second experiment design additionally based onminimum and maximum values of continuous ranges of numerical values. Theprocessor may be caused to perform operations including: monitor theinput device to enable reception of input that indicates a correction tothe identified matches between the multiple terms of the first andsecond experiment designs; analyze the indicated correction to determinewhether the indicated correction entails a match between factors ofdissimilar factor type; and in response to a determination that theindicated correction entails a match between factors of dissimilarfactors type, present an indication of incorrect input on the display.The processor may be caused to perform operations including, for eachfactor of the multiple factors of the model associated with the firstexperiment design, identify a matching factor of the multiple factors ofthe model associated with the second experiment design additionallybased on the text of the factor identifier of each factor, andvocabulary data comprising a thesaurus of matches among words based onmeanings associated with the words.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including, for eachterm of the multiple terms of the model associated with the firstexperiment design, identify a matching term of the multiple terms of themodel associated with the second experiment design additionally based onthe text of the term identifier of each term, and vocabulary datacomprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words. The processor may be caused to performoperations including monitor the input device to enable reception ofinput that indicates a correction to the identified matches between themultiple terms of the first and second experiment designs. In responseto a receipt, from the input device, of input indicating a correction tothe identified matches between the multiple terms of the first andsecond experiment designs, perform operations including: store withinthe vocabulary data and as an exception to a match among words of thethesaurus, an indication of at least one match between texts specifiedby the indicated correction; enact the indicated correction; andpresent, on the display, the identified matches between the multipleterms of the first and second experiment designs and the identifiedmatches between the multiple responses of the first and secondexperiment designs after enactment of the indicated correction.

The model associated with each experiment design may include multipleresponses as outputs of the model; each response of the multipleresponses may be identified by a response identifier; and the processormay be caused to perform operations including, for each response of themultiple responses of the model associated with the first experimentdesign, identify a matching response of the multiple responses of themodel associated with the second experiment design additionally based onthe text of the response identifier of each response, and vocabularydata comprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: receive,from the input device, indications of a selection of a term matchedbetween the first and second experiment designs to add to a set of termsto be included in the comparison between the first and second experimentdesigns; and analyze the models associated with the first and secondexperiment designs to determine whether the addition of the indicatedselected term to the set of terms causes the set of terms to becomeunsupportable by either of the first and second experiment designs. Inresponse to a determination that the addition of the indicated selectedterm to the set of terms causes the set of terms to become unsupportableby either of the first and second experiment designs, the processor maybe caused to perform operations including present an indication ofineligible input on the display, and remove the indicated selected termfrom the set of terms to cause the set of terms to become supportable byboth of the first and second experiment designs.

A computer-program product tangibly embodied in a non-transitorymachine-readable storage medium, the computer-program product includinginstructions that may be operable to cause a processor to performoperations including receive, from an input device communicativelycoupled to the processor, indications of selection of a plurality ofexperiment designs to be compared, wherein: each experiment design ofthe plurality of experiment designs specifies a quantity of runs of atest to perform a designed experiment; each experiment design isassociated with a model of a system under evaluation; the modelassociated with each experiment design comprises multiple terms asinputs to the model; each term comprises at least one factor of multiplefactors that are each an input to the system; each factor of themultiple factors is identified by a factor identifier; and each term ofthe multiple terms is identified by a term identifier comprising text.For each factor of the multiple factors of the model associated with afirst experiment design of the plurality of designs, the processor maybe caused to identify a matching factor of the multiple factors of themodel associated with a second experiment design of the plurality ofdesigns based on a factor type of each factor, wherein the factor typeis selected from the group consisting of a categorical factor and acontinuous factor. For each categorical factor of the multiple factorsof the model associated with the first experiment design, the processormay be caused to identify a matching factor of the multiple factors ofthe model associated with the second experiment design additionallybased on quantity of levels of each factor. For each term of themultiple terms of the model associated with the first experiment design,the processor may be caused to identify a matching term of the multipleterms of the model associated with the second experiment design based onan order of each term. The processor may be caused to present, on adisplay communicatively coupled to the processor, the identified matchesbetween the multiple terms of the first and second experiment designsand the identified matches between the multiple responses of the firstand second experiment designs.

The order of each term of the first and second experiment designs may beselected from a group consisting of a first order main effect term, asecond order term, and a third order term. The processor may be causedto perform operations including: monitor the input device to enablereception of input that indicates a correction to the identified matchesbetween the multiple terms of the first and second experiment designs;analyze the indicated correction to determine whether the indicatedcorrection specifies a match between terms of dissimilar order; and inresponse to a determination that the indicated correction specifies amatch between terms of dissimilar order, present an indication ofincorrect input on the display.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including identify amatch between a categorical factor of the model associated with thefirst experiment design and a categorical factor of the model associatedwith the second experiment design additionally based on matches betweenthe levels. The processor may be caused to perform operations includingidentify a match between a continuous factor of the model associatedwith the first experiment design and a continuous factor of the modelassociated with the second experiment design additionally based onminimum and maximum values of continuous ranges of numerical values. Theprocessor may be caused to perform operations including: monitor theinput device to enable reception of input that indicates a correction tothe identified matches between the multiple terms of the first andsecond experiment designs; analyze the indicated correction to determinewhether the indicated correction entails a match between factors ofdissimilar factor type; and in response to a determination that theindicated correction entails a match between factors of dissimilarfactor type, present an indication of incorrect input on the display.The processor may be caused to perform operations including, for eachfactor of the multiple factors of the model associated with the firstexperiment design, identify a matching factor of the multiple factors ofthe model associated with the second experiment design additionallybased on the text of the factor identifier of each factor, andvocabulary data comprising a thesaurus of matches among words based onmeanings associated with the words.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including, for eachterm of the multiple terms of the model associated with the firstexperiment design, identify a matching term of the multiple terms of themodel associated with the second experiment design additionally based onthe text of the term identifier of each term, and vocabulary datacomprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words. The processor may be caused to performoperations including monitor the input device to enable reception ofinput that indicates a correction to the identified matches between themultiple terms of the first and second experiment designs. In responseto a receipt, from the input device, of input indicating a correction tothe identified matches between the multiple terms of the first andsecond experiment designs, the processor may be caused to performoperations including store within the vocabulary data and as anexception to a match among words of the thesaurus, an indication of atleast one match between texts specified by the indicated correction;enact the indicated correction; and present, on the display, theidentified matches between the multiple terms of the first and secondexperiment designs and the identified matches between the multipleresponses of the first and second experiment designs after enactment ofthe indicated correction.

The model associated with each experiment design comprises multipleresponses as outputs of the model; each response of the multipleresponses may be identified by a response identifier; and the processormay be caused to perform operations including, for each response of themultiple responses of the model associated with the first experimentdesign, identify a matching response of the multiple responses of themodel associated with the second experiment design additionally based onthe text of the response identifier of each response, and vocabularydata comprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: for eachexperiment design of the plurality of experiment designs, derive astatistical power for each term of the set of terms; for each term ofthe set of terms, generate a graph of statistical power versus quantityof runs that includes a plot of the term for each experiment design ofthe plurality of experiment designs; for each graph of statistical powerversus quantity of runs, fit a curve to the plots therein; and presentthe graphs of statistical power versus quantity of runs generated forall of the terms of the set of terms at adjacent locations on thedisplay.

A computer-implemented method may include receiving, at a coordinatingdevice from an input device, indications of selection of a plurality ofexperiment designs to be compared, wherein: each experiment design ofthe plurality of experiment designs specifies a quantity of runs of atest to perform a designed experiment; each experiment design isassociated with a model of a system under evaluation; the modelassociated with each experiment design comprises multiple terms asinputs to the model; each term comprises at least one factor of multiplefactors that are each an input to the system; each factor of themultiple factors is identified by a factor identifier; and each term ofthe multiple terms is identified by a term identifier comprising text.The method may further include, for each factor of the multiple factorsof the model associated with a first experiment design of the pluralityof designs, identifying a matching factor of the multiple factors of themodel associated with a second experiment design of the plurality ofdesigns based on a factor type of each factor, wherein the factor typeis selected from the group consisting of a categorical factor and acontinuous factor. The method may further include, for each categoricalfactor of the multiple factors of the model associated with the firstexperiment design, identify a matching factor of the multiple factors ofthe model associated with the second experiment design additionallybased on quantity of levels of each factor. The method may furtherinclude, for each term of the multiple terms of the model associatedwith the first experiment design, identifying a matching term of themultiple terms of the model associated with the second experiment designbased on an order of each term. The method may further includepresenting, on a display communicatively coupled to the coordinatingdevice, the identified matches between the multiple terms of the firstand second experiment designs and the identified matches between themultiple responses of the first and second experiment designs.

The order of each term of the first and second experiment designs may beselected from a group consisting of a first order main effect term, asecond order term, and a third order term. The method may include:monitoring the input device to enable reception of input that indicatesa correction to the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs; analyzing the indicated correctionto determine whether the indicated correction specifies a match betweenterms of dissimilar order; and in response to a determination that theindicated correction specifies a match between terms of dissimilarorder, presenting an indication of incorrect input on the display.

The method may include identifying a match between a categorical factorof the model associated with the first experiment design and acategorical factor of the model associated with the second experimentdesign additionally based on matches between the levels. The method mayinclude identifying a match between a continuous factor of the modelassociated with the first experiment design and a continuous factor ofthe model associated with the second experiment design additionallybased on minimum and maximum values of continuous ranges of numericalvalues. The method may include monitoring the input device to enablereception of input that indicates a correction to the identified matchesbetween the multiple terms of the first and second experiment designs;analyzing the indicated correction to determine whether the indicatedcorrection entails a match between factors of dissimilar factor type;and in response to a determination that the indicated correction entailsa match between factors of dissimilar factor type, presenting anindication of incorrect input on the display. The method may include foreach factor of the multiple factors of the model associated with thefirst experiment design, identifying a matching factor of the multiplefactors of the model associated with the second experiment designadditionally based on the text of the factor identifier of each factor,and vocabulary data comprising a thesaurus of matches among words basedon meanings associated with the words.

The method may include, for each term of the multiple terms of the modelassociated with the first experiment design, identifying a matching termof the multiple terms of the model associated with the second experimentdesign additionally based on the text of the term identifier of eachterm, and vocabulary data comprising a thesaurus of matches among wordsbased on meanings associated with the words. The method may includemonitoring the input device to enable reception of input that indicatesa correction to the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs. The method may include, in responseto a receipt, from the input device, of input indicating a correction tothe identified matches between the multiple terms of the first andsecond experiment designs, performing operations including: storingwithin the vocabulary data and as an exception to a match among words ofthe thesaurus, an indication of at least one match between textsspecified by the indicated correction; enacting the indicatedcorrection; and presenting, on the display, the identified matchesbetween the multiple terms of the first and second experiment designsand the identified matches between the multiple responses of the firstand second experiment designs after enactment of the indicatedcorrection.

The model associated with each experiment design may include multipleresponses as outputs of the model, and each response of the multipleresponses may include identified by a response identifier. The methodmay include, for each factor of the multiple factors of the modelassociated with the first experiment design, identifying a matchingresponse of the multiple responses of the model associated with thesecond experiment design additionally based on the text of the responseidentifier of each response, and vocabulary data comprising a thesaurusof matches among words based on meanings associated with the words.

The method may include, for each experiment design of the plurality ofexperiment designs, generating a graph of all terms of the set of termsalong a horizontal axis versus all terms of the set of terms along avertical axis, wherein a degree of correlation of the pair of termsassociated with each intersection within the graph is visuallyindicated; and the visual indication of degree of correlation isselected from a group consisting of: a color; a degree of gray shading;and a pattern. The method may include presenting, on the display, thegraphs generated for all of the terms of the experiment designs of theplurality of experiment designs at adjacent locations on the display.

An apparatus may include a processor and a storage to store instructionsthat, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to performoperations including receive, from an input device communicativelycoupled to the processor, indications of selection of a set ofexperiment designs to be compared, wherein: each experiment design ofthe set of experiment designs is associated with a model of a systemunder evaluation; each experiment design specifies a quantity of runs ofa test to perform to analyze the system; and the model associated witheach experiment design comprises multiple terms as inputs to the modeland multiple responses as outputs of the model. The processor may befurther caused to receive, from the input device, indications ofselection of a set of terms to be included in the comparison, whereineach term of the set of terms is included in the multiple terms of themodel associated with each experiment design of the set of experimentdesigns. For each experiment design of the set of experiment designs,the processor may be further caused to generate a corresponding termcorrelation graph of a set of term correlation graphs, wherein: thecorrelation graph comprises a horizontal axis along which the set ofterms are arranged, and a vertical axis along which the set of terms arearranged; at each intersection of a term along the horizontal axis and aterm along the vertical axis within the graph, a degree of correlationbetween the term along the horizontal axis and the term along thevertical axis is indicated with a visual indicator selected from a setof visual indicators; the visual indicators of the set of visualindicators are assigned an order that corresponds to a continuous rangeof degree of correlation; and the continuous range of degree ofcorrelation is divided into a set of contiguous sub-ranges, and eachvisual indicator corresponds to one of the sub-ranges. The processor maybe further caused to present at least two correlation graphs of the setof correlation graphs at adjacent locations on a display communicativelycoupled to the processor.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including monitor theinput device to enable reception of input that indicates a change to theset of terms; and in response to receipt of input from the input deviceto add a term to the set of terms, analyze the model associated witheach experiment design of the set of experiment designs to determinewhether the addition of the term to the set of terms causes the set ofterms to become unsupportable by any experiment design of the set ofexperiment design. In response to a determination that the addition ofthe term to the set of terms causes the set of terms to becomeunsupportable by any experiment design of the set of experiment designs,the processor may be caused to perform operations including present anindication of ineligible input on the display, and remove the term fromthe set of terms to cause the set of terms to become supportable by eachexperiment design of the set of experiment designs. The processor may becaused, for each experiment design of the set of experiment designs, toperform operations including: derive a covariance of each pair of termsable to be generated from among the set of terms, and derive the degreeof correlation of each pair of terms from the covariance derived for thepair of terms and from a standard deviation of each term of the pair ofterms.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: generatethe horizontal axes of at least two term correlation graphs of the setof term correlation graphs to have an identical horizontal orientation;generate the vertical axes of the at least two term correlation graphsof the set of term correlation graphs to have an identical verticalorientation; and arrange the terms of the set of terms in an identicalorder along the horizontal axes and along the vertical axes of the atleast two term correlation graphs of the set of term correlation graphs,such that all of the intersections at which a term of the set of termsis correlated to itself are arranged along a diagonal line that has anidentical position and orientation within the at least two termcorrelation graphs of the set of term correlation graphs.

The terms of the set of terms may be arranged along the horizontal andvertical axes of the at least two correlation graphs to group the termsof the set of terms based on order. The order of each term of the set ofterms may be selected from a group consisting of: a first order maineffect term; a second order term; and a third order term. A visualdifference that indicates differing degrees of correlation among thevisual indicators of the set of visual indicators may be selected from agroup consisting of different colors, different degrees of gray shading,and different visual patterns.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: monitor theinput device to enable reception of input that indicates a change to theset of terms; and in response to receipt of input that indicates achange to the set of terms to add or remove a specified term, performoperations including enact the change to the set of terms to add orremove the specified term, and repeat the generation of the set of termcorrelation graphs based on the set of terms after enactment of thechange to the set of terms. The processor is caused to performoperations including: for each experiment design of the set ofexperiment designs, derive a statistical power for each term of the setof terms; for each term of the set of terms, generate a graph ofstatistical power versus quantity of runs that includes a plot of theterm for each experiment design of the set of experiment designs; foreach graph of statistical power versus quantity of runs, fit a curve tothe plots therein; and present the graphs of statistical power versusquantity of runs generated for all of the terms of the set of terms atadjacent locations on the display.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: for eachterm of the multiple terms of the model associated with a firstexperiment design of the set of experiment designs, identify a matchingterm of the multiple terms of the model associated with a secondexperiment design of the set of experiment designs based on an order ofeach term, text of a term identifier of each term, and vocabulary datacomprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words; and present, on the display, the identifiedmatches between the multiple terms of the models associated with thefirst and second experiment designs. The processor may be caused toperform operations including monitor the input device to enablereception of input that indicates a change to the set of terms. Inresponse to a receipt of input from the input device indicating acorrection to the identified matches between the multiple terms of themodels associated with the first and second experiment designs, theprocessor may be caused to perform operations including: store withinthe vocabulary data and as an exception to a match among words of thethesaurus, an indication of at least one match between texts specifiedby the indicated correction; enact the indicated correction; andpresent, on the display, the identified matches between the multipleterms of the models associated with the first and second experimentdesigns.

A computer-program product tangibly embodied in a non-transitorymachine-readable storage medium, the computer-program product includinginstructions that may be operable to cause a processor to performoperations including receive, from an input device communicativelycoupled to the processor, indications of selection of a set ofexperiment designs to be compared, wherein: each experiment design ofthe set of experiment designs is associated with a model of a systemunder evaluation; each experiment design specifies a quantity of runs ofa test to perform to analyze the system; and the model associated witheach experiment design comprises multiple terms as inputs to the modeland multiple responses as outputs of the model. The processor may befurther caused to receive, from the input device, indications ofselection of a set of terms to be included in the comparison, whereineach term of the set of terms is included in the multiple terms of themodel associated with each experiment design of the set of experimentdesigns. The processor may be further caused to, for each experimentdesign of the set of experiment designs, generate a corresponding termcorrelation graph of a set of term correlation graphs, wherein: thecorrelation graph comprises a horizontal axis along which the set ofterms are arranged, and a vertical axis along which the set of terms arearranged; at each intersection of a term along the horizontal axis and aterm along the vertical axis within the graph, a degree of correlationbetween the term along the horizontal axis and the term along thevertical axis is indicated with a visual indicator selected from a setof visual indicators; the visual indicators of the set of visualindicators are assigned an order that corresponds to a continuous rangeof degree of correlation; and the continuous range of degree ofcorrelation is divided into a set of contiguous sub-ranges, and eachvisual indicator corresponds to one of the sub-ranges. The processor maybe further caused to present at least two correlation graphs of the setof correlation graphs at adjacent locations on a display communicativelycoupled to the processor.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: monitor theinput device to enable reception of input that indicates a change to theset of terms; and in response to receipt of input from the input deviceto add a term to the set of terms, analyze the model associated witheach experiment design of the set of experiment designs to determinewhether the addition of the term to the set of terms causes the set ofterms to become unsupportable by any experiment design of the set ofexperiment designs. The processor may be further caused to, in responseto a determination that the addition of the term to the set of termscauses the set of terms to become unsupportable by any experiment designof the set of experiment designs, perform operations including: presentan indication of ineligible input on the display; and remove the termfrom the set of terms to cause the set of terms to become supportable byeach experiment design of the set of experiment designs. The processormay be caused, for each experiment design of the set of experimentdesigns, to perform operations including: derive a covariance of eachpair of terms able to be generated from among the set of terms; andderive the degree of correlation of each pair of terms from thecovariance derived for the pair of terms and from a standard deviationof each term of the pair of terms.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: generatethe horizontal axes of at least two term correlation graphs of the setof term correlation graphs to have an identical horizontal orientation;generate the vertical axes of the at least two term correlation graphsof the set of term correlation graphs to have an identical verticalorientation; and arrange the terms of the set of terms in an identicalorder along the horizontal axes and along the vertical axes of the atleast two term correlation graphs of the set of term correlation graphs,such that all of the intersections at which a term of the set of termsis correlated to itself are arranged along a diagonal line that has anidentical position and orientation within the at least two termcorrelation graphs of the set of term correlation graphs. The terms ofthe set of terms may be arranged along the horizontal and vertical axesof the at least two correlation graphs to group the terms of the set ofterms based on order. The order of each term of the set of terms may beselected from a group consisting of a first order main effect term, asecond order term, and a third order term. A visual difference thatindicates differing degrees of correlation among the visual indicatorsof the set of visual indicators may be selected from a group consistingof different colors, different degrees of gray shading, and differentvisual patterns.

The processor is caused to perform operations including: monitor theinput device to enable reception of input that indicates a change to theset of terms; and in response to receipt of input that indicates achange to the set of terms to add or remove a specified term, performoperations including enact the change to the set of terms to add orremove the specified term, and repeat the generation of the set of termcorrelation graphs based on the set of terms after enactment of thechange to the set of terms. The processor may be caused to performoperations including: for each experiment design of the set ofexperiment designs, derive a statistical power for each term of the setof terms; for each term of the set of terms, generate a graph ofstatistical power versus quantity of runs that includes a plot of theterm for each experiment design of the set of experiment designs; foreach graph of statistical power versus quantity of runs, fit a curve tothe plots therein; and present the graphs of statistical power versusquantity of runs generated for all of the terms of the set of terms atadjacent locations on the display.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: for eachterm of the multiple terms of the model associated with a firstexperiment design of the set of experiment designs, identify a matchingterm of the multiple terms of the model associated with a secondexperiment design of the set of experiment designs based on an order ofeach term, text of a term identifier of each term, and vocabulary datacomprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words; and present, on the display, the identifiedmatches between the multiple terms of the models associated with thefirst and second experiment designs. The processor may caused to performoperations including monitor the input device to enable reception ofinput that indicates a change to the set of terms. In response to areceipt of input from the input device indicating a correction to theidentified matches between the multiple terms of the models associatedwith the first and second experiment designs, the processor may becaused to perform operations including: store within the vocabulary dataand as an exception to a match among words of the thesaurus, anindication of at least one match between texts specified by theindicated correction; enact the indicated correction; and present, onthe display, the identified matches between the multiple terms of themodels associated with the first and second experiment designs.

A computer-implemented method may include receiving, at a coordinatingdevice from an input device, indications of selection of a set ofexperiment designs to be compared, wherein: each experiment design ofthe set of experiment designs is associated with a model of a systemunder evaluation; each experiment design specifies a quantity of runs ofa test to perform to analyze the system; and the model associated witheach experiment design comprises multiple terms as inputs to the modeland multiple responses as outputs of the model. The method may furtherinclude receiving, from the input device, indications of selection of aset of terms to be included in the comparison, wherein each term of theset of terms is included in the multiple terms of the model associatedwith each experiment design of the set of experiment designs. The methodmay further include, for each experiment design of the set of experimentdesigns, generating a corresponding term correlation graph of a set ofterm correlation graphs, wherein: the correlation graph comprises ahorizontal axis along which the set of terms are arranged, and avertical axis along which the set of terms are arranged; at eachintersection of a term along the horizontal axis and a term along thevertical axis within the graph, a degree of correlation between the termalong the horizontal axis and the term along the vertical axis isindicated with a visual indicator selected from a set of visualindicators; the visual indicators of the set of visual indicators areassigned an order that corresponds to a continuous range of degree ofcorrelation; and the continuous range of degree of correlation isdivided into a set of contiguous sub-ranges, and each visual indicatorcorresponds to one of the sub-ranges. The method may further includepresenting at least two correlation graphs of the set of correlationgraphs at adjacent locations on a display communicatively coupled to thecoordinating device.

The method may include: monitoring the input device to enable receptionof input that indicates a change to the set of terms; and in response toreceipt of input from the input device to add a term to the set ofterms, analyzing the model associated with each experiment design of theset of experiment designs to determine whether the addition of the termto the set of terms causes the set of terms to become unsupportable byany experiment design of the set of experiment designs. The method mayinclude, in response to a determination that the addition of the term tothe set of terms causes the set of terms to become unsupportable by anyexperiment design of the set of experiment designs, performingoperations including presenting an indication of ineligible input on thedisplay, and removing the term from the set of terms to cause the set ofterms to become supportable by each experiment design of the set ofexperiment designs. The method may include, for each experiment designof the set of experiment designs, performing operations includingderiving a covariance of each pair of terms able to be generated fromamong the set of terms, and deriving the degree of correlation of eachpair of terms from the covariance derived for the pair of terms and froma standard deviation of each term of the pair of terms.

The method may include: generating the horizontal axes of at least twoterm correlation graphs of the set of term correlation graphs to have anidentical horizontal orientation; generating the vertical axes of the atleast two term correlation graphs of the set of term correlation graphsto have an identical vertical orientation; and arranging the terms ofthe set of terms in an identical order along the horizontal axes andalong the vertical axes of the at least two term correlation graphs ofthe set of term correlation graphs, such that all of the intersectionsat which a term of the set of terms is correlated to itself are arrangedalong a diagonal line that has an identical position and orientationwithin the at least two term correlation graphs of the set of termcorrelation graphs. The terms of the set of terms may be arranged alongthe horizontal and vertical axes of the at least two correlation graphsto group the terms of the set of terms based on order. The order of eachterm of the set of terms may be selected from a group consisting of afirst order main effect term, a second order term, and a third orderterm. A visual difference that indicates differing degrees ofcorrelation among the visual indicators of the set of visual indicatorsmay be selected from a group consisting of different colors, differentdegrees of gray shading, and different visual patterns.

The method may include monitoring the input device to enable receptionof input that indicates a change to the set of terms. The method mayinclude, in response to receipt of input that indicates a change to theset of terms to add or remove a specified term, performing operationsincluding enacting the change to the set of terms to add or remove thespecified term; and repeating the generation of the set of termcorrelation graphs based on the set of terms after enactment of thechange to the set of terms. The method may include: for each experimentdesign of the set of experiment designs, deriving a statistical powerfor each term of the set of terms; for each term of the set of terms,generating a graph of statistical power versus quantity of runs thatincludes a plot of the term for each experiment design of the set ofexperiment designs; for each graph of statistical power versus quantityof runs, fitting a curve to the plots therein; and presenting the graphsof statistical power versus quantity of runs generated for all of theterms of the set of terms at adjacent locations on the display.

The method may include, for each term of the multiple terms of the modelassociated with a first experiment design of the set of experimentdesigns, identifying a matching term of the multiple terms of the modelassociated with a second experiment design of the set of experimentdesigns based on an order of each term, text of a term identifier ofeach term, and vocabulary data comprising a thesaurus of matches amongwords based on meanings associated with the words; and presenting, onthe display, the identified matches between the multiple terms of themodels associated with the first and second experiment designs. Themethod may include monitoring the input device to enable reception ofinput that indicates a change to the set of terms. The method mayinclude, in response to a receipt of input from the input deviceindicating a correction to the identified matches between the multipleterms of the models associated with the first and second experimentdesigns, performing operations including: storing within the vocabularydata and as an exception to a match among words of the thesaurus, anindication of at least one match between texts specified by theindicated correction; enacting the indicated correction; and presenting,on the display, the identified matches between the multiple terms of themodels associated with the first and second experiment designs.

An apparatus may include a processor and a storage to store instructionsthat, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to performoperations including receive, from an input device communicativelycoupled to the processor, an indication of selection of an experimentdesign for regression analysis, wherein: the experiment design specifiesa quantity of runs of a test to perform a designed experiment; theexperiment design is associated with a model of a system underevaluation; the model comprises multiple terms as inputs to the model;each term comprises at least one factor of multiple factors that areeach an input to the system; the experiment design specifies an initialvalue of a coefficient for each term; the experiment design specifies aset of levels for each factor; and the experiment design specifies asingle initial degree of difficulty in varying levels and a singleinitial degree of random error that are applicable to all factors. Theprocessor may be further caused to: receive, from the input device, anindication of selection of a type of distribution for a simulation ofrandom data to employ as values of the multiple factors during theregression analysis; receive, from the input device, an indication ofselection of a number of iterations of the simulation of random data toperform during the regression analysis; generate first executableinstructions in a pre-selected programming language to be executable bythe processor to perform the regression analysis with the selectednumber of iterations of simulation of the random data and with theselected type of distribution; generate a human readable form of aportion of the first executable instructions that includes thecoefficients and terms in mathematical notation, and that specifies theselected number of iterations and the selected type of distribution forthe simulation of random data; and present, on a display communicativelycoupled to the processor, the human readable form of the portion of thefirst executable instructions.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including monitor theinput device to enable reception of input of a command to perform theregression analysis. In response to reception of the command, theprocessor is caused to perform operations including: execute, by theprocessor, the first executable instructions to perform the regressionanalysis, wherein the performance of the regression analysis comprisesgeneration of the selected number of iterations of the random data withthe selected type of distribution; and present, on the display, resultsof the regression analysis based on the first executable instructions.For each term, the results of the regression analysis may include aderived value of the coefficient to replace the initial value based onthe simulated random data. For each term, the results of the regressionanalysis may include an indication of statistical power based on theinitial degree of random error represented by the simulated random datagenerated for the term. The processor may be caused to performoperations including: monitor the input device to enable reception ofinput that indicates a separate degree of random error to be representedby the simulated random data to be generated for at least one specifiedfactor of the multiple factors; generate second executable instructionsin the pre-selected programming language to be executable by theprocessor to perform the regression analysis with the selected number ofiterations of simulation of the random data and with the selected typeof distribution, wherein the separate degree of random error is appliedto the at least one specified factor; execute, by the processor, thesecond executable instructions to perform the regression analysis,wherein the performance of the regression analysis comprises generationof the selected number of iterations of the random data with theselected type of distribution; and present, on the display, results ofthe regression analysis based on the second executable instructions.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: receive,from the input device, an indication of selection of one factor of themultiple factors as a whole plot factor; receive, from the input device,an indication of a separate degree of difficulty in varying levels thatis applicable to the whole plot factor; generate second executableinstructions in the pre-selected programming language that to beexecutable by the processor to perform the regression analysis with theselected number of iterations of simulation of the random data and withthe selected type of distribution, wherein the runs are organized tominimize the varying of levels of the whole plot factor; generate ahuman readable form of a portion of the second executable instructionsthat includes the coefficients and terms in mathematical notation, andthat specifies the selected number of iterations and the selected typeof distribution for the simulation of random data; and present, on adisplay communicatively coupled to the processor, the human readableform of the portion of the second executable instructions. The selectionof the whole plot factor may define the experiment design as asplit-plot design; the human readable form of the portion of the secondexecutable instructions may explicitly present a separate expression ofeach level of the whole plot factor; and each separate expression of alevel of the whole plot factor may be accompanied by a separateexpression of simulation of random data for the multiple factors otherthan the whole plot factor. The processor may be caused to performoperations including: receive, from the input device, an indication ofselection of another factor of the multiple factors as a subplot factor;receive, from the input device, an indication of another separate degreeof difficulty in varying levels that is applicable to the subplotfactor; and generate the second executable instructions in thepre-selected programming language to be executable by the processor toperform the regression analysis with the selected number of iterationsof simulation of the random data and with the selected type ofdistribution, wherein the runs are organized to minimize transitionsbetween levels of the whole plot factor and to minimize transitionsbetween levels of the subplot factor. The selection of the whole plotfactor and of the subplot factor may define the experiment design as asplit-split-plot design; the human readable form of the portion of thesecond executable instructions may explicitly present a separateexpression of each combination of a level of the whole plot factor and alevel of the subplot factor; and each separate expression of acombination of a level of the whole plot factor and a level of thesubplot factor may be accompanied by a separate expression of simulationof random data for the multiple factors other than the whole plot factorand the subplot factor.

The mathematical notation may include at least one separator ofexpressions within the human readable form of the portion of the firstexecutable instructions selected from the group consisting of a pair ofparenthesis, a pair of brackets, and a vinculum.

A computer-program product tangibly embodied in a non-transitorymachine-readable storage medium, the computer-program product includinginstructions that may be operable to cause a processor to performoperations including receive, from an input device communicativelycoupled to the processor, an indication of selection of an experimentdesign for regression analysis, wherein: the experiment design specifiesa quantity of runs of a test to perform a designed experiment; theexperiment design is associated with a model of a system underevaluation; the model comprises multiple terms as inputs to the model;each term comprises at least one factor of multiple factors that areeach an input to the system; the experiment design specifies an initialvalue of a coefficient for each term; the experiment design specifies aset of levels for each factor; and the experiment design specifies asingle initial degree of difficulty in varying levels and a singleinitial degree of random error that are applicable to all factors. Theprocessor may be further caused to perform operations including:receive, from the input device, an indication of selection of a type ofdistribution for a simulation of random data to employ as values of themultiple factors during the regression analysis; receive, from the inputdevice, an indication of selection of a number of iterations of thesimulation of random data to perform during the regression analysis;generate first executable instructions in a pre-selected programminglanguage to be executable by the processor to perform the regressionanalysis with the selected number of iterations of simulation of therandom data and with the selected type of distribution; generate a humanreadable form of a portion of the first executable instructions thatincludes the coefficients and terms in mathematical notation, and thatspecifies the selected number of iterations and the selected type ofdistribution for the simulation of random data; and present, on adisplay communicatively coupled to the processor, the human readableform of the portion of the first executable instructions.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including monitor theinput device to enable reception of input of a command to perform theregression analysis. In response to reception of the command, theprocessor may be caused to perform operations including: execute, by theprocessor, the first executable instructions to perform the regressionanalysis, wherein the performance of the regression analysis comprisesgeneration of the selected number of iterations of the random data withthe selected type of distribution; and present, on the display, resultsof the regression analysis based on the first executable instructions.For each term, the results of the regression analysis may include aderived value of the coefficient to replace the initial value based onthe simulated random data. For each term, the results of the regressionanalysis may include an indication of statistical power based on theinitial degree of random error represented by the simulated random datagenerated for the term. The processor may be caused to performoperations including: monitor the input device to enable reception ofinput that indicates a separate degree of random error to be representedby the simulated random data to be generated for at least one specifiedfactor of the multiple factors; generate second executable instructionsin the pre-selected programming language to be executable by theprocessor to perform the regression analysis with the selected number ofiterations of simulation of the random data and with the selected typeof distribution, wherein the separate degree of random error is appliedto the at least one specified factor; execute, by the processor, thesecond executable instructions to perform the regression analysis,wherein the performance of the regression analysis comprises generationof the selected number of iterations of the random data with theselected type of distribution; and present, on the display, results ofthe regression analysis based on the second executable instructions.

The processor may be caused to perform operations including: receive,from the input device, an indication of selection of one factor of themultiple factors as a whole plot factor; receive, from the input device,an indication of a separate degree of difficulty in varying levels thatis applicable to the whole plot factor; generate second executableinstructions in the pre-selected programming language that to beexecutable by the processor to perform the regression analysis with theselected number of iterations of simulation of the random data and withthe selected type of distribution, wherein the runs are organized tominimize the varying of levels of the whole plot factor; generate ahuman readable form of a portion of the second executable instructionsthat includes the coefficients and terms in mathematical notation, andthat specifies the selected number of iterations and the selected typeof distribution for the simulation of random data; and present, on adisplay communicatively coupled to the processor, the human readableform of the portion of the second executable instructions. The selectionof the whole plot factor defines the experiment design as a split-plotdesign; the human readable form of the portion of the second executableinstructions explicitly presents a separate expression of each level ofthe whole plot factor; and each separate expression of a level of thewhole plot factor is accompanied by a separate expression of simulationof random data for the multiple factors other than the whole plotfactor. The processor may be caused to perform operations including:receive, from the input device, an indication of selection of anotherfactor of the multiple factors as a subplot factor; receive, from theinput device, an indication of another separate degree of difficulty invarying levels that is applicable to the subplot factor; and generatethe second executable instructions in the pre-selected programminglanguage to be executable by the processor to perform the regressionanalysis with the selected number of iterations of simulation of therandom data and with the selected type of distribution, wherein the runsare organized to minimize transitions between levels of the whole plotfactor and to minimize transitions between levels of the subplot factor.The selection of the whole plot factor and of the subplot factor maydefine the experiment design as a split-split-plot design; the humanreadable form of the portion of the second executable instructions mayexplicitly present a separate expression of each combination of a levelof the whole plot factor and a level of the subplot factor; and eachseparate expression of a combination of a level of the whole plot factorand a level of the subplot factor may be accompanied by a separateexpression of simulation of random data for the multiple factors otherthan the whole plot factor and the subplot factor.

The mathematical notation may include at least one separator ofexpressions within the human readable form of the portion of the firstexecutable instructions selected from the group consisting of a pair ofparenthesis, a pair of brackets, and a vinculum.

A computer-implemented method may include receiving, at a processor andfrom an input device communicatively coupled to the processor, anindication of selection of an experiment design for regression analysis,wherein: the experiment design specifies a quantity of runs of a test toperform a designed experiment; the experiment design is associated witha model of a system under evaluation; the model comprises multiple termsas inputs to the model; each term comprises at least one factor ofmultiple factors that are each an input to the system; the experimentdesign specifies an initial value of a coefficient for each term; theexperiment design specifies a set of levels for each factor; and theexperiment design specifies a single initial degree of difficulty invarying levels and a single initial degree of random error that areapplicable to all factors. The method may further include: receiving, atthe processor and from the input device, an indication of selection of atype of distribution for a simulation of random data to employ as valuesof the multiple factors during the regression analysis; receiving, atthe processor and from the input device, an indication of selection of anumber of iterations of the simulation of random data to perform duringthe regression analysis; generating, by the processor, first executableinstructions in a pre-selected programming language to be executable bythe processor to perform the regression analysis with the selectednumber of iterations of simulation of the random data and with theselected type of distribution; generating a human readable form of aportion of the first executable instructions that includes thecoefficients and terms in mathematical notation, and that specifies theselected number of iterations and the selected type of distribution forthe simulation of random data; and presenting, on a displaycommunicatively coupled to the processor, the human readable form of theportion of the first executable instructions.

The method may include monitoring the input device to enable receptionof input of a command to perform the regression analysis. In response toreception of the command, the method may include performing operationsincluding: executing, by the processor, the first executableinstructions to perform the regression analysis, wherein performing theregression analysis comprises generating, by the processor, of theselected number of iterations of the random data with the selected typeof distribution; and presenting, on the display, results of theregression analysis based on the first executable instructions. For eachterm, the results of the regression analysis comprise a derived value ofthe coefficient to replace the initial value based on the simulatedrandom data. For each term, the results of the regression analysiscomprise an indication of statistical power based on the initial degreeof random error represented by the simulated random data generated forthe term. The method may include: monitoring the input device to enablereception of input that indicates a separate degree of random error tobe represented by the simulated random data to be generated for at leastone specified factor of the multiple factors; generating, by theprocessor, second executable instructions in the pre-selectedprogramming language to be executable by the processor to perform theregression analysis with the selected number of iterations of simulationof the random data and with the selected type of distribution, whereinthe separate degree of random error is applied to the at least onespecified factor; executing, by the processor, the second executableinstructions to perform the regression analysis, wherein the performanceof the regression analysis comprises generation of the selected numberof iterations of the random data with the selected type of distribution;and presenting, on the display, results of the regression analysis basedon the second executable instructions.

The method may include: receiving, at the processor and from the inputdevice, an indication of selection of one factor of the multiple factorsas a whole plot factor; receiving, at the processor and from the inputdevice, an indication of a separate degree of difficulty in varyinglevels that is applicable to the whole plot factor; generating, by theprocessor, second executable instructions in the pre-selectedprogramming language that to be executable by the processor to performthe regression analysis with the selected number of iterations ofsimulation of the random data and with the selected type ofdistribution, wherein the runs are organized to minimize the varying oflevels of the whole plot factor; generating a human readable form of aportion of the second executable instructions that includes thecoefficients and terms in mathematical notation, and that specifies theselected number of iterations and the selected type of distribution forthe simulation of random data; and presenting, on a displaycommunicatively coupled to the processor, the human readable form of theportion of the second executable instructions. The method may include:the selection of the whole plot factor defines the experiment design asa split-plot design; the human readable form of the portion of thesecond executable instructions explicitly presents a separate expressionof each level of the whole plot factor; and each separate expression ofa level of the whole plot factor is accompanied by a separate expressionof simulation of random data for the multiple factors other than thewhole plot factor. The method may include: receiving, at the processorand from the input device, an indication of selection of another factorof the multiple factors as a subplot factor; receiving, at the processorand from the input device, an indication of another separate degree ofdifficulty in varying levels that is applicable to the subplot factor;and generating, by the processor, the second executable instructions inthe pre-selected programming language to be executable by the processorto perform the regression analysis with the selected number ofiterations of simulation of the random data and with the selected typeof distribution, wherein the runs are organized to minimize transitionsbetween levels of the whole plot factor and to minimize transitionsbetween levels of the subplot factor. The selection of the whole plotfactor and of the subplot factor may define the experiment design as asplit-split-plot design; the human readable form of the portion of thesecond executable instructions may explicitly present a separateexpression of each combination of a level of the whole plot factor and alevel of the subplot factor; and each separate expression of acombination of a level of the whole plot factor and a level of thesubplot factor may be accompanied by a separate expression of simulationof random data for the multiple factors other than the whole plot factorand the subplot factor.

The mathematical notation may include at least one separator ofexpressions within the human readable form of the portion of the firstexecutable instructions selected from the group consisting of a pair ofparenthesis, a pair of brackets, and a vinculum.

The foregoing, together with other features and embodiments, will becomemore apparent upon referring to the following specification, claims, andaccompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure is described in conjunction with the appendedfigures:

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram that provides an illustration of thehardware components of a computing system, according to some embodimentsof the present technology.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example network including an example set ofdevices communicating with each other over an exchange system and via anetwork, according to some embodiments of the present technology.

FIG. 3 illustrates a representation of a conceptual model of acommunications protocol system, according to some embodiments of thepresent technology.

FIG. 4 illustrates a communications grid computing system including avariety of control and worker nodes, according to some embodiments ofthe present technology.

FIG. 5 illustrates a flow chart showing an example process for adjustinga communications grid or a work project in a communications grid after afailure of a node, according to some embodiments of the presenttechnology.

FIG. 6 illustrates a portion of a communications grid computing systemincluding a control node and a worker node, according to someembodiments of the present technology.

FIG. 7 illustrates a flow chart showing an example process for executinga data analysis or processing project, according to some embodiments ofthe present technology.

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram including components of an EventStream Processing Engine (ESPE), according to embodiments of the presenttechnology.

FIG. 9 illustrates a flow chart showing an example process includingoperations performed by an event stream processing engine, according tosome embodiments of the present technology.

FIG. 10 illustrates an ESP system interfacing between a publishingdevice and multiple event subscribing devices, according to embodimentsof the present technology.

FIG. 11 illustrates a flow chart showing an example process ofgenerating and using a machine-learning model according to some aspects.

FIG. 12 illustrates an example machine-learning model based on a neuralnetwork.

FIGS. 13A and 13B each illustrate an example embodiment of a distributedprocessing system.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of guiding generation, selection andperformances of regression analyses with experiment designs by thedistributed processing system.

FIG. 15 illustrates an example of guiding the generation of anexperiment design for inclusion in a set of experiment designs.

FIG. 16 illustrates an example of guiding the selection of an experimentdesign from the set of experiment designs of FIG. 15.

FIGS. 17A, 17B, 17C, 17D, 17E and 17F, together, illustrate additionaldetails of the guidance of selection of an experiment design of FIG. 16.

FIG. 18 illustrates an example of guiding the performance of aregression analysis of the experiment design selected via the guidanceof FIG. 16.

FIGS. 19A, 19B, 19C, 19D and 19E, together, illustrate additionaldetails of the guidance of performance of a regression analysis of FIG.18.

FIGS. 20A and 20B, together, illustrate an example embodiment of a logicflow of guiding generation, selection and performances of regressionanalyses with experiment designs.

FIG. 21 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow of matchingfactors among experiment designs in the guidance of selection of anexperiment design of FIGS. 20A-B.

FIG. 22 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow of guidingselection of terms in the guidance of selection of an experiment designof FIGS. 20A-B.

FIG. 23 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow of derivingand presenting statistical power in the guidance of selection of anexperiment design of FIGS. 20A-B.

FIG. 24 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow of derivingand presenting prediction variance in the guidance of selection of anexperiment design of FIGS. 20A-B.

FIG. 25 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow of derivingand presenting correlations between terms in the guidance of selectionof an experiment design of FIGS. 20A-B.

FIGS. 26A and 26B, together, illustrate an example embodiment of a logicflow of the guidance of performance of a regression analysis of FIGS.20A-B.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments described herein are generally directed totechniques for analyzing and comparing aspects of multiple experimentdesigns to enable the selection of an experiment design to be performedto develop an understanding of a linkage between particular factors andresponses of a system being studied. Various embodiments describedherein are also generally directed to techniques for using of simulateddata in regression analyses to derive parameters of a model associatedwith a particular experiment design. More precisely, a set of analyticaltools and an associated graphical user interface (GUI) are provided toderive and present comparisons and characterizations of multipleexperiment designs to enable selection and refinement of an experimentdesign for use in developing an understanding of a linkage betweenparticular factors and responses of a studied system, as well asdeveloping an understanding of changes that may be made to one or moreparticular factors to bring about a desired change in one or moreresponses. Such tools may automatically identify matches betweenfeatures of multiple experiment designs that are selected forcomparison. Such tools and associated GUI may generate and presentvisualizations of various aspects of multiple experiment designs in amanner that advantageously utilizes features of the human visual system(HVS) to aid in recognizing salient aspects of experiment designs. Suchtools and associated GUI may also automatically generate and present amore readily understandable visualization of the manner in whichsimulated data may be generated and employed in a regression analysis torefine aspects of a model associated with a selected experiment design.In various embodiments, parameters of the selected experiment design maybe provided to a distributed processing system, either to perform suchregression analysis or to perform the selected experiment design.

The variety of studied systems to which these techniques may be appliedmay include any of a wide variety of systems, including and not limitedto, chemical processes, sub-atomic particle interactions, biomechanicaland/or biochemical systems, geological systems, meteorological systems,manufacturing systems, electrical and/or optical networks, group egressbehaviors in response to fire emergencies in public spaces, etc. Theimpetus to apply these techniques may be the observation of undesiredresponses of a studied system leading to a desire to identify the one ormore factors of the studied system that are linked to those undesiredresponses. Alternatively or additionally, the impetus may include thedesire to derive changes to make to the identified factors that maybring about more desirable responses from the studied system. However,as will be familiar to those skilled in the art, such systems aretypically highly complex such that they defy efforts at understanding oraddressing undesirable responses through intuitive ad hoctrial-and-error experimentation. By way of example, there may be toomany factors and/or responses to consider, such that the quantity ofobservation data may be too large to make such unsystematicexperimentation practical.

In a distributed processing system that may be employed to select and/oranalyze an experiment design, one or more data devices may store a dataset made up of observation data representing captured values of factorsand corresponding responses of a studied system. In some embodiments,the one or more data devices may be co-located with and/or directlycoupled to the studied system to capture such observation data (e.g.,located at a facility to capture observation data from a chemical ormanufacturing process that is performed there). In such embodiments, theone or more data devices may incorporate measuring device(s) that maydirectly capture observation data to thereby generate the stored dataset. In other embodiments, the one or more data devices may be storagedevices employed to store the data set and/or other information relatedto the studied system and/or to experiment designs that may be used indeveloping an understanding of the studied system. In such otherembodiments, the one or more data devices may recurringly receive andaggregate observation data that may be captured and transmitted to theone or more data devices by one or more remotely located measuringdevices (e.g., measuring devices distributed among medical facilities tocapture biomechanical or biochemical data of patients undergoingtreatment in a medical study).

A coordinating device of the distributed processing system may provide aGUI by which an operator may manually input parameters that define anexperiment design and associated model. More specifically, thecoordinating device may provide a menu-based and/or step-wise guided GUIthat enables an operator to specify aspects of an experiment design andassociated model, including and not limited to, factors, ranges ofvalues of continuous factors, levels of categorical factors, terms basedon the factors, responses, identifiers given to factors and responses,initial coefficients, initial degree(s) of error, a quantity of runs,input values for the factors for use during the runs, etc. As will beexplained in greater detail, such a manually entered experiment designand associated model may be based on a set of constraints that aredesired to be imposed on the performance of an experiment design, andmay be employed as a reference against which one or more otherexperiment designs may be compared as part of enabling the selection ofan experiment design to be performed.

The coordinating device may provide another GUI by which an operator maybe presented with comparisons of aspects of two or more experimentdesigns to guide the operator in the selection of an experiment designto be performed. The operator may be visually guided, via the GUI,through providing various parameters for use in performing thecomparisons, including and not limited to, selections of two or moreexperiment designs to be compared, corrections to one or moreautomatically derived matches between factors and/or terms of thecompared experiment designs, selections of terms and/or responses to beincluded in the comparisons, signal-to-noise ratios that the selectedterms are expected to be subject to, and/or degree(s) of error that theselected terms are expected to be subject to.

During and/or following the provision of such parameters, the operatormay be visually presented, via the GUI, with various graphs and/or othervisualizations depicting comparisons between aspects of each of thecompared experiment designs. In so doing, graphs and/or othervisualizations depicting corresponding aspects of different ones of thecompared experiment designs may be presented at adjacent locations on adisplay in a manner that advantageously utilizes features of the HVS toenable speedy recognition of degrees of similarity therebetween. Morespecifically, such graphs and/or other visualizations may be positionedadjacent to each other in a horizontal side-by-side manner that utilizesthe generally horizontal binocular placement of the eyes that impartsthe typical “landscape” orientation to the field of view (FOV) of theHVS. Such visual presentations may be interactive in nature such thatdepicted numerical values in such visual presentations are dynamicallyre-derived in response to each new input by an operator to select,specify and/or change a parameter.

The coordinating device may provide still another GUI by which anoperator may be presented with aspects of the manner in which simulateddata may be randomly generated during regression analysis to determineone or more aspects of the model associated with the selected experimentdesign, such as coefficients and/or statistical power. The operator maybe visually guided, via the GUI, through providing various parametersfor use in the regression analysis, including and not limited to, valuesfor one or more coefficients and/or changes thereto, degree(s) ofdifficulty in varying levels of one or more factors, degree(s) of errorthat one or more terms are expected to be subject to and/or changesthereto, selection of a type of distribution of simulated data to berandomly generated, and/or a number of iterations to perform of theregression analysis and accompanying generation of simulated data.

During and/or following the provision of such parameters, thecoordinating device may generate and/or repeatedly regenerateinstructions that are executable by one or more processors and/orprocessor cores to perform the regression analysis and accompanyinggeneration of simulated data. Following such generation or regeneration,the operator may be visually presented, via the GUI, with a humanreadable form of a portion of the executable instructions that includesthe presentation of the model in the form of a formula that includes thecoefficients and terms, as well as human readable expressions of aspectsof randomly generating the simulated data. In situations in whichdifferent degrees of difficulty in varying the levels of one or morefactors have been specified, such that a split-plot or split-split-plotconfiguration is thereby specified, the visually presented formula mayinclude portions separated by bracketing that separately specify thefactors for which the varying the levels is more difficult, as well asexplicit expressions of the manner in which the varying of levels forthose factors are to be minimized (such that the quantity of transitionsbetween levels are minimized for those factors) during generation of thesimulated data.

In some embodiments, the GUI may be visually presented on a displayincorporated into or otherwise connected to the coordinating device.Also, one or more input devices, such as a keyboard and/or pointingdevice, may be monitored for receive inputs from an operator in responseto prompting by the GUI, where the one or more input devices may also beincorporated into or otherwise connected to the coordinating device.However, in other embodiments, the display and/or the one or more inputdevices may be incorporated into and/or otherwise connected to aseparate viewing device of the distributed system.

In some embodiments, the distributed processing system may incorporate agrid of node devices among which the specified iterations ofperformances of the regression analysis and associated generation ofsimulated data may be distributed. More precisely, the coordinatingdevice may distribute the executable instructions for performing theregression analysis, including the random generation of simulated data,among such a grid of node devices. The coordinating device may thencoordinate an at least partially parallel performance of the iterationsof the regression analysis by the grid of node devices, and aggregatethe results thereof. In other embodiments, the coordinating device may,itself, incorporate one or more processors and/or processor cores amongwhich the executable instructions for performing the regressionanalysis, including the random generation of simulated data, may bedistributed. Following such distribution, the coordinating device maythen coordinate an at least partially parallel performance of theiterations of the regression analysis by those processors and/orprocessor cores.

In some embodiments, following the performance of the regressionanalysis and accompanying generation of simulated data, the distributedprocessing system may directly perform the selected experiment design.As previously discussed, it may be that the one or more data devices maybe co-located with the studied system. In some of such embodiments, theone or more data devices may control the studied system, and therefore,may be capable of actually performing the selected experiment design bydirectly varying factors and capturing the resulting responses. In someof such embodiments, the coordinating device may transmit a designprofile and/or other information to the one or more data devices as partof enabling the one or more data devices to perform the experimentdesign with the studied system.

With general reference to notations and nomenclature used herein,portions of the detailed description that follows may be presented interms of program procedures executed by a processor of a machine or ofmultiple networked machines. These procedural descriptions andrepresentations are used by those skilled in the art to most effectivelyconvey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. Aprocedure is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistentsequence of operations leading to a desired result. These operations arethose requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually,though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical,magnetic or optical communications capable of being stored, transferred,combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It proves convenient attimes, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to what iscommunicated as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms,numbers, or the like. It should be noted, however, that all of these andsimilar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physicalquantities and are merely convenient labels applied to those quantities.

Further, these manipulations are often referred to in terms, such asadding or comparing, which are commonly associated with mentaloperations performed by a human operator. However, no such capability ofa human operator is necessary, or desirable in most cases, in any of theoperations described herein that form part of one or more embodiments.Rather, these operations are machine operations. Useful machines forperforming operations of various embodiments include machinesselectively activated or configured by a routine stored within that iswritten in accordance with the teachings herein, and/or includeapparatus specially constructed for the required purpose. Variousembodiments also relate to apparatus or systems for performing theseoperations. These apparatus may be specially constructed for therequired purpose or may include a general purpose computer. The requiredstructure for a variety of these machines will appear from thedescription given.

Reference is now made to the drawings, wherein like reference numeralsare used to refer to like elements throughout. In the followingdescription, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details areset forth in order to provide a thorough understanding thereof. It maybe evident, however, that the novel embodiments can be practiced withoutthese specific details. In other instances, well known structures anddevices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate adescription thereof. The intention is to cover all modifications,equivalents, and alternatives within the scope of the claims.

Systems depicted in some of the figures may be provided in variousconfigurations. In some embodiments, the systems may be configured as adistributed system where one or more components of the system aredistributed across one or more networks in a cloud computing systemand/or a fog computing system.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram that provides an illustration of the hardwarecomponents of a data transmission network 100, according to embodimentsof the present technology. Data transmission network 100 is aspecialized computer system that may be used for processing largeamounts of data where a large number of computer processing cycles arerequired.

Data transmission network 100 may also include computing environment114. Computing environment 114 may be a specialized computer or othermachine that processes the data received within the data transmissionnetwork 100. Data transmission network 100 also includes one or morenetwork devices 102. Network devices 102 may include client devices thatattempt to communicate with computing environment 114. For example,network devices 102 may send data to the computing environment 114 to beprocessed, may send signals to the computing environment 114 to controldifferent aspects of the computing environment or the data it isprocessing, among other reasons. Network devices 102 may interact withthe computing environment 114 through a number of ways, such as, forexample, over one or more networks 108. As shown in FIG. 1, computingenvironment 114 may include one or more other systems. For example,computing environment 114 may include a database system 118 and/or acommunications grid 120.

In other embodiments, network devices may provide a large amount ofdata, either all at once or streaming over a period of time (e.g., usingevent stream processing (ESP), described further with respect to FIGS.8-10), to the computing environment 114 via networks 108. For example,network devices 102 may include network computers, sensors, databases,or other devices that may transmit or otherwise provide data tocomputing environment 114. For example, network devices may includelocal area network devices, such as routers, hubs, switches, or othercomputer networking devices. These devices may provide a variety ofstored or generated data, such as network data or data specific to thenetwork devices themselves. Network devices may also include sensorsthat monitor their environment or other devices to collect dataregarding that environment or those devices, and such network devicesmay provide data they collect over time. Network devices may alsoinclude devices within the internet of things, such as devices within ahome automation network. Some of these devices may be referred to asedge devices, and may involve edge computing circuitry. Data may betransmitted by network devices directly to computing environment 114 orto network-attached data stores, such as network-attached data stores110 for storage so that the data may be retrieved later by the computingenvironment 114 or other portions of data transmission network 100.

Data transmission network 100 may also include one or morenetwork-attached data stores 110. Network-attached data stores 110 areused to store data to be processed by the computing environment 114 aswell as any intermediate or final data generated by the computing systemin non-volatile memory. However in certain embodiments, theconfiguration of the computing environment 114 allows its operations tobe performed such that intermediate and final data results can be storedsolely in volatile memory (e.g., RAM), without a requirement thatintermediate or final data results be stored to non-volatile types ofmemory (e.g., disk). This can be useful in certain situations, such aswhen the computing environment 114 receives ad hoc queries from a userand when responses, which are generated by processing large amounts ofdata, need to be generated on-the-fly. In this non-limiting situation,the computing environment 114 may be configured to retain the processedinformation within memory so that responses can be generated for theuser at different levels of detail as well as allow a user tointeractively query against this information.

Network-attached data stores may store a variety of different types ofdata organized in a variety of different ways and from a variety ofdifferent sources. For example, network-attached data storage mayinclude storage other than primary storage located within computingenvironment 114 that is directly accessible by processors locatedtherein. Network-attached data storage may include secondary, tertiaryor auxiliary storage, such as large hard drives, servers, virtualmemory, among other types. Storage devices may include portable ornon-portable storage devices, optical storage devices, and various othermediums capable of storing, containing data. A machine-readable storagemedium or computer-readable storage medium may include a non-transitorymedium in which data can be stored and that does not include carrierwaves and/or transitory electronic signals. Examples of a non-transitorymedium may include, for example, a magnetic disk or tape, opticalstorage media such as compact disk or digital versatile disk, flashmemory, memory or memory devices. A computer-program product may includecode and/or machine-executable instructions that may represent aprocedure, a function, a subprogram, a program, a routine, a subroutine,a module, a software package, a class, or any combination ofinstructions, data structures, or program statements. A code segment maybe coupled to another code segment or a hardware circuit by passingand/or receiving information, data, arguments, parameters, or memorycontents. Information, arguments, parameters, data, etc. may be passed,forwarded, or transmitted via any suitable means including memorysharing, message passing, token passing, network transmission, amongothers. Furthermore, the data stores may hold a variety of differenttypes of data. For example, network-attached data stores 110 may holdunstructured (e.g., raw) data, such as manufacturing data (e.g., adatabase containing records identifying products being manufactured withparameter data for each product, such as colors and models) or productsales databases (e.g., a database containing individual data recordsidentifying details of individual product sales).

The unstructured data may be presented to the computing environment 114in different forms such as a flat file or a conglomerate of datarecords, and may have data values and accompanying time stamps. Thecomputing environment 114 may be used to analyze the unstructured datain a variety of ways to determine the best way to structure (e.g.,hierarchically) that data, such that the structured data is tailored toa type of further analysis that a user wishes to perform on the data.For example, after being processed, the unstructured time stamped datamay be aggregated by time (e.g., into daily time period units) togenerate time series data and/or structured hierarchically according toone or more dimensions (e.g., parameters, attributes, and/or variables).For example, data may be stored in a hierarchical data structure, suchas a ROLAP OR MOLAP database, or may be stored in another tabular form,such as in a flat-hierarchy form.

Data transmission network 100 may also include one or more server farms106. Computing environment 114 may route select communications or datato the one or more sever farms 106 or one or more servers within theserver farms. Server farms 106 can be configured to provide informationin a predetermined manner. For example, server farms 106 may access datato transmit in response to a communication. Server farms 106 may beseparately housed from each other device within data transmissionnetwork 100, such as computing environment 114, and/or may be part of adevice or system.

Server farms 106 may host a variety of different types of dataprocessing as part of data transmission network 100. Server farms 106may receive a variety of different data from network devices, fromcomputing environment 114, from cloud network 116, or from othersources. The data may have been obtained or collected from one or moresensors, as inputs from a control database, or may have been received asinputs from an external system or device. Server farms 106 may assist inprocessing the data by turning raw data into processed data based on oneor more rules implemented by the server farms. For example, sensor datamay be analyzed to determine changes in an environment over time or inreal-time.

Data transmission network 100 may also include one or more cloudnetworks 116. Cloud network 116 may include a cloud infrastructuresystem that provides cloud services. In certain embodiments, servicesprovided by the cloud network 116 may include a host of services thatare made available to users of the cloud infrastructure system on demandCloud network 116 is shown in FIG. 1 as being connected to computingenvironment 114 (and therefore having computing environment 114 as itsclient or user), but cloud network 116 may be connected to or utilizedby any of the devices in FIG. 1. Services provided by the cloud networkcan dynamically scale to meet the needs of its users. The cloud network116 may comprise one or more computers, servers, and/or systems. In someembodiments, the computers, servers, and/or systems that make up thecloud network 116 are different from the user's own on-premisescomputers, servers, and/or systems. For example, the cloud network 116may host an application, and a user may, via a communication networksuch as the Internet, on demand, order and use the application.

While each device, server and system in FIG. 1 is shown as a singledevice, it will be appreciated that multiple devices may instead beused. For example, a set of network devices can be used to transmitvarious communications from a single user, or remote server 140 mayinclude a server stack. As another example, data may be processed aspart of computing environment 114.

Each communication within data transmission network 100 (e.g., betweenclient devices, between servers 106 and computing environment 114 orbetween a server and a device) may occur over one or more networks 108.Networks 108 may include one or more of a variety of different types ofnetworks, including a wireless network, a wired network, or acombination of a wired and wireless network. Examples of suitablenetworks include the Internet, a personal area network, a local areanetwork (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), or a wireless local areanetwork (WLAN). A wireless network may include a wireless interface orcombination of wireless interfaces. As an example, a network in the oneor more networks 108 may include a short-range communication channel,such as a BLUETOOTH® communication channel or a BLUETOOTH® Low Energycommunication channel. A wired network may include a wired interface.The wired and/or wireless networks may be implemented using routers,access points, bridges, gateways, or the like, to connect devices in thenetwork 114, as will be further described with respect to FIG. 2. Theone or more networks 108 can be incorporated entirely within or caninclude an intranet, an extranet, or a combination thereof. In oneembodiment, communications between two or more systems and/or devicescan be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as securesockets layer (SSL) or transport layer security (TLS). In addition, dataand/or transactional details may be encrypted.

Some aspects may utilize the Internet of Things (IoT), where things(e.g., machines, devices, phones, sensors) can be connected to networksand the data from these things can be collected and processed within thethings and/or external to the things. For example, the IoT can includesensors in many different devices, and high value analytics can beapplied to identify hidden relationships and drive increasedefficiencies. This can apply to both big data analytics and real-time(e.g., ESP) analytics. This will be described further below with respectto FIG. 2.

As noted, computing environment 114 may include a communications grid120 and a transmission network database system 118. Communications grid120 may be a grid-based computing system for processing large amounts ofdata. The transmission network database system 118 may be for managing,storing, and retrieving large amounts of data that are distributed toand stored in the one or more network-attached data stores 110 or otherdata stores that reside at different locations within the transmissionnetwork database system 118. The compute nodes in the grid-basedcomputing system 120 and the transmission network database system 118may share the same processor hardware, such as processors that arelocated within computing environment 114.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example network including an example set ofdevices communicating with each other over an exchange system and via anetwork, according to embodiments of the present technology. As noted,each communication within data transmission network 100 may occur overone or more networks. System 200 includes a network device 204configured to communicate with a variety of types of client devices, forexample client devices 230, over a variety of types of communicationchannels.

As shown in FIG. 2, network device 204 can transmit a communication overa network (e.g., a cellular network via a base station 210). Thecommunication can be routed to another network device, such as networkdevices 205-209, via base station 210. The communication can also berouted to computing environment 214 via base station 210. For example,network device 204 may collect data either from its surroundingenvironment or from other network devices (such as network devices205-209) and transmit that data to computing environment 214.

Although network devices 204-209 are shown in FIG. 2 as a mobile phone,laptop computer, tablet computer, temperature sensor, motion sensor, andaudio sensor respectively, the network devices may be or include sensorsthat are sensitive to detecting aspects of their environment. Forexample, the network devices may include sensors such as water sensors,power sensors, electrical current sensors, chemical sensors, opticalsensors, pressure sensors, geographic or position sensors (e.g., GPS),velocity sensors, acceleration sensors, flow rate sensors, among others.Examples of characteristics that may be sensed include force, torque,load, strain, position, temperature, air pressure, fluid flow, chemicalproperties, resistance, electromagnetic fields, radiation, irradiance,proximity, acoustics, moisture, distance, speed, vibrations,acceleration, electrical potential, electrical current, among others.The sensors may be mounted to various components used as part of avariety of different types of systems (e.g., an oil drilling operation).The network devices may detect and record data related to theenvironment that it monitors, and transmit that data to computingenvironment 214.

As noted, one type of system that may include various sensors thatcollect data to be processed and/or transmitted to a computingenvironment according to certain embodiments includes an oil drillingsystem. For example, the one or more drilling operation sensors mayinclude surface sensors that measure a hook load, a fluid rate, atemperature and a density in and out of the wellbore, a standpipepressure, a surface torque, a rotation speed of a drill pipe, a rate ofpenetration, a mechanical specific energy, etc. and downhole sensorsthat measure a rotation speed of a bit, fluid densities, downholetorque, downhole vibration (axial, tangential, lateral), a weightapplied at a drill bit, an annular pressure, a differential pressure, anazimuth, an inclination, a dog leg severity, a measured depth, avertical depth, a downhole temperature, etc. Besides the raw datacollected directly by the sensors, other data may include parameterseither developed by the sensors or assigned to the system by a client orother controlling device. For example, one or more drilling operationcontrol parameters may control settings such as a mud motor speed toflow ratio, a bit diameter, a predicted formation top, seismic data,weather data, etc. Other data may be generated using physical modelssuch as an earth model, a weather model, a seismic model, a bottom holeassembly model, a well plan model, an annular friction model, etc. Inaddition to sensor and control settings, predicted outputs, of forexample, the rate of penetration, mechanical specific energy, hook load,flow in fluid rate, flow out fluid rate, pump pressure, surface torque,rotation speed of the drill pipe, annular pressure, annular frictionpressure, annular temperature, equivalent circulating density, etc. mayalso be stored in the data warehouse.

In another example, another type of system that may include varioussensors that collect data to be processed and/or transmitted to acomputing environment according to certain embodiments includes a homeautomation or similar automated network in a different environment, suchas an office space, school, public space, sports venue, or a variety ofother locations. Network devices in such an automated network mayinclude network devices that allow a user to access, control, and/orconfigure various home appliances located within the user's home (e.g.,a television, radio, light, fan, humidifier, sensor, microwave, iron,and/or the like), or outside of the user's home (e.g., exterior motionsensors, exterior lighting, garage door openers, sprinkler systems, orthe like). For example, network device 102 may include a home automationswitch that may be coupled with a home appliance. In another embodiment,a network device can allow a user to access, control, and/or configuredevices, such as office-related devices (e.g., copy machine, printer, orfax machine), audio and/or video related devices (e.g., a receiver, aspeaker, a projector, a DVD player, or a television), media-playbackdevices (e.g., a compact disc player, a CD player, or the like),computing devices (e.g., a home computer, a laptop computer, a tablet, apersonal digital assistant (PDA), a computing device, or a wearabledevice), lighting devices (e.g., a lamp or recessed lighting), devicesassociated with a security system, devices associated with an alarmsystem, devices that can be operated in an automobile (e.g., radiodevices, navigation devices), and/or the like. Data may be collectedfrom such various sensors in raw form, or data may be processed by thesensors to create parameters or other data either developed by thesensors based on the raw data or assigned to the system by a client orother controlling device.

In another example, another type of system that may include varioussensors that collect data to be processed and/or transmitted to acomputing environment according to certain embodiments includes a poweror energy grid. A variety of different network devices may be includedin an energy grid, such as various devices within one or more powerplants, energy farms (e.g., wind farm, solar farm, among others) energystorage facilities, factories, homes and businesses of consumers, amongothers. One or more of such devices may include one or more sensors thatdetect energy gain or loss, electrical input or output or loss, and avariety of other efficiencies. These sensors may collect data to informusers of how the energy grid, and individual devices within the grid,may be functioning and how they may be made more efficient.

Network device sensors may also perform processing on data it collectsbefore transmitting the data to the computing environment 114, or beforedeciding whether to transmit data to the computing environment 114. Forexample, network devices may determine whether data collected meetscertain rules, for example by comparing data or values calculated fromthe data and comparing that data to one or more thresholds. The networkdevice may use this data and/or comparisons to determine if the datashould be transmitted to the computing environment 214 for further useor processing.

Computing environment 214 may include machines 220 and 240. Althoughcomputing environment 214 is shown in FIG. 2 as having two machines, 220and 240, computing environment 214 may have only one machine or may havemore than two machines. The machines that make up computing environment214 may include specialized computers, servers, or other machines thatare configured to individually and/or collectively process large amountsof data. The computing environment 214 may also include storage devicesthat include one or more databases of structured data, such as dataorganized in one or more hierarchies, or unstructured data. Thedatabases may communicate with the processing devices within computingenvironment 214 to distribute data to them. Since network devices maytransmit data to computing environment 214, that data may be received bythe computing environment 214 and subsequently stored within thosestorage devices. Data used by computing environment 214 may also bestored in data stores 235, which may also be a part of or connected tocomputing environment 214.

Computing environment 214 can communicate with various devices via oneor more routers 225 or other inter-network or intra-network connectioncomponents. For example, computing environment 214 may communicate withdevices 230 via one or more routers 225. Computing environment 214 maycollect, analyze and/or store data from or pertaining to communications,client device operations, client rules, and/or user-associated actionsstored at one or more data stores 235. Such data may influencecommunication routing to the devices within computing environment 214,how data is stored or processed within computing environment 214, amongother actions.

Notably, various other devices can further be used to influencecommunication routing and/or processing between devices within computingenvironment 214 and with devices outside of computing environment 214.For example, as shown in FIG. 2, computing environment 214 may include aweb server 240. Thus, computing environment 214 can retrieve data ofinterest, such as client information (e.g., product information, clientrules, etc.), technical product details, news, current or predictedweather, and so on.

In addition to computing environment 214 collecting data (e.g., asreceived from network devices, such as sensors, and client devices orother sources) to be processed as part of a big data analytics project,it may also receive data in real time as part of a streaming analyticsenvironment. As noted, data may be collected using a variety of sourcesas communicated via different kinds of networks or locally. Such datamay be received on a real-time streaming basis. For example, networkdevices may receive data periodically from network device sensors as thesensors continuously sense, monitor and track changes in theirenvironments. Devices within computing environment 214 may also performpre-analysis on data it receives to determine if the data receivedshould be processed as part of an ongoing project. The data received andcollected by computing environment 214, no matter what the source ormethod or timing of receipt, may be processed over a period of time fora client to determine results data based on the client's needs andrules.

FIG. 3 illustrates a representation of a conceptual model of acommunications protocol system, according to embodiments of the presenttechnology. More specifically, FIG. 3 identifies operation of acomputing environment in an Open Systems Interaction model thatcorresponds to various connection components. The model 300 shows, forexample, how a computing environment, such as computing environment 314(or computing environment 214 in FIG. 2) may communicate with otherdevices in its network, and control how communications between thecomputing environment and other devices are executed and under whatconditions.

The model can include layers 301-307. The layers are arranged in astack. Each layer in the stack serves the layer one level higher than it(except for the application layer, which is the highest layer), and isserved by the layer one level below it (except for the physical layer,which is the lowest layer). The physical layer is the lowest layerbecause it receives and transmits raw bites of data, and is the farthestlayer from the user in a communications system. On the other hand, theapplication layer is the highest layer because it interacts directlywith a software application.

As noted, the model includes a physical layer 301. Physical layer 301represents physical communication, and can define parameters of thatphysical communication. For example, such physical communication maycome in the form of electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signals.Physical layer 301 also defines protocols that may controlcommunications within a data transmission network.

Link layer 302 defines links and mechanisms used to transmit (i.e.,move) data across a network. The link layer 302 manages node-to-nodecommunications, such as within a grid computing environment. Link layer302 can detect and correct errors (e.g., transmission errors in thephysical layer 301). Link layer 302 can also include a media accesscontrol (MAC) layer and logical link control (LLC) layer.

Network layer 303 defines the protocol for routing within a network. Inother words, the network layer coordinates transferring data acrossnodes in a same network (e.g., such as a grid computing environment).Network layer 303 can also define the processes used to structure localaddressing within the network.

Transport layer 304 can manage the transmission of data and the qualityof the transmission and/or receipt of that data. Transport layer 304 canprovide a protocol for transferring data, such as, for example, aTransmission Control Protocol (TCP). Transport layer 304 can assembleand disassemble data frames for transmission. The transport layer canalso detect transmission errors occurring in the layers below it.

Session layer 305 can establish, maintain, and manage communicationconnections between devices on a network. In other words, the sessionlayer controls the dialogues or nature of communications between networkdevices on the network. The session layer may also establishcheckpointing, adjournment, termination, and restart procedures.

Presentation layer 306 can provide translation for communicationsbetween the application and network layers. In other words, this layermay encrypt, decrypt and/or format data based on data types and/orencodings known to be accepted by an application or network layer.

Application layer 307 interacts directly with software applications andend users, and manages communications between them. Application layer307 can identify destinations, local resource states or availabilityand/or communication content or formatting using the applications.

Intra-network connection components 321 and 322 are shown to operate inlower levels, such as physical layer 301 and link layer 302,respectively. For example, a hub can operate in the physical layer, aswitch can operate in the link layer, and a router can operate in thenetwork layer. Inter-network connection components 323 and 328 are shownto operate on higher levels, such as layers 303-307. For example,routers can operate in the network layer and network devices can operatein the transport, session, presentation, and application layers.

As noted, a computing environment 314 can interact with and/or operateon, in various embodiments, one, more, all or any of the various layers.For example, computing environment 314 can interact with a hub (e.g.,via the link layer) so as to adjust which devices the hub communicateswith. The physical layer may be served by the link layer, so it mayimplement such data from the link layer. For example, the computingenvironment 314 may control which devices it will receive data from. Forexample, if the computing environment 314 knows that a certain networkdevice has turned off, broken, or otherwise become unavailable orunreliable, the computing environment 314 may instruct the hub toprevent any data from being transmitted to the computing environment 314from that network device. Such a process may be beneficial to avoidreceiving data that is inaccurate or that has been influenced by anuncontrolled environment. As another example, computing environment 314can communicate with a bridge, switch, router or gateway and influencewhich device within the system (e.g., system 200) the component selectsas a destination. In some embodiments, computing environment 314 caninteract with various layers by exchanging communications with equipmentoperating on a particular layer by routing or modifying existingcommunications. In another embodiment, such as in a grid computingenvironment, a node may determine how data within the environment shouldbe routed (e.g., which node should receive certain data) based oncertain parameters or information provided by other layers within themodel.

As noted, the computing environment 314 may be a part of acommunications grid environment, the communications of which may beimplemented as shown in the protocol of FIG. 3. For example, referringback to FIG. 2, one or more of machines 220 and 240 may be part of acommunications grid computing environment. A gridded computingenvironment may be employed in a distributed system with non-interactiveworkloads where data resides in memory on the machines, or computenodes. In such an environment, analytic code, instead of a databasemanagement system, controls the processing performed by the nodes. Datais co-located by pre-distributing it to the grid nodes, and the analyticcode on each node loads the local data into memory. Each node may beassigned a particular task such as a portion of a processing project, orto organize or control other nodes within the grid.

FIG. 4 illustrates a communications grid computing system 400 includinga variety of control and worker nodes, according to embodiments of thepresent technology. Communications grid computing system 400 includesthree control nodes and one or more worker nodes. Communications gridcomputing system 400 includes control nodes 402, 404, and 406. Thecontrol nodes are communicatively connected via communication paths 451,453, and 455. Therefore, the control nodes may transmit information(e.g., related to the communications grid or notifications), to andreceive information from each other. Although communications gridcomputing system 400 is shown in FIG. 4 as including three controlnodes, the communications grid may include more or less than threecontrol nodes.

Communications grid computing system (or just “communications grid”) 400also includes one or more worker nodes. Shown in FIG. 4 are six workernodes 410-420. Although FIG. 4 shows six worker nodes, a communicationsgrid according to embodiments of the present technology may include moreor less than six worker nodes. The number of worker nodes included in acommunications grid may be dependent upon how large the project or dataset is being processed by the communications grid, the capacity of eachworker node, the time designated for the communications grid to completethe project, among others. Each worker node within the communicationsgrid 400 may be connected (wired or wirelessly, and directly orindirectly) to control nodes 402-406. Therefore, each worker node mayreceive information from the control nodes (e.g., an instruction toperform work on a project) and may transmit information to the controlnodes (e.g., a result from work performed on a project). Furthermore,worker nodes may communicate with each other (either directly orindirectly). For example, worker nodes may transmit data between eachother related to a job being performed or an individual task within ajob being performed by that worker node. However, in certainembodiments, worker nodes may not, for example, be connected(communicatively or otherwise) to certain other worker nodes. In anembodiment, worker nodes may only be able to communicate with thecontrol node that controls it, and may not be able to communicate withother worker nodes in the communications grid, whether they are otherworker nodes controlled by the control node that controls the workernode, or worker nodes that are controlled by other control nodes in thecommunications grid.

A control node may connect with an external device with which thecontrol node may communicate (e.g., a grid user, such as a server orcomputer, may connect to a controller of the grid). For example, aserver or computer may connect to control nodes and may transmit aproject or job to the node. The project may include a data set. The dataset may be of any size. Once the control node receives such a projectincluding a large data set, the control node may distribute the data setor projects related to the data set to be performed by worker nodes.Alternatively, for a project including a large data set, the data setmay be received or stored by a machine other than a control node (e.g.,a HADOOP® standard-compliant data node employing the HADOOP® DistributedFile System, or HDFS).

Control nodes may maintain knowledge of the status of the nodes in thegrid (i.e., grid status information), accept work requests from clients,subdivide the work across worker nodes, coordinate the worker nodes,among other responsibilities. Worker nodes may accept work requests froma control node and provide the control node with results of the workperformed by the worker node. A grid may be started from a single node(e.g., a machine, computer, server, etc.). This first node may beassigned or may start as the primary control node that will control anyadditional nodes that enter the grid.

When a project is submitted for execution (e.g., by a client or acontroller of the grid) it may be assigned to a set of nodes. After thenodes are assigned to a project, a data structure (i.e., a communicator)may be created. The communicator may be used by the project forinformation to be shared between the project code running on each node.A communication handle may be created on each node. A handle, forexample, is a reference to the communicator that is valid within asingle process on a single node, and the handle may be used whenrequesting communications between nodes.

A control node, such as control node 402, may be designated as theprimary control node. A server, computer or other external device mayconnect to the primary control node. Once the control node receives aproject, the primary control node may distribute portions of the projectto its worker nodes for execution. For example, when a project isinitiated on communications grid 400, primary control node 402 controlsthe work to be performed for the project in order to complete theproject as requested or instructed. The primary control node maydistribute work to the worker nodes based on various factors, such aswhich subsets or portions of projects may be completed most efficientlyand in the correct amount of time. For example, a worker node mayperform analysis on a portion of data that is already local (e.g.,stored on) the worker node. The primary control node also coordinatesand processes the results of the work performed by each worker nodeafter each worker node executes and completes its job. For example, theprimary control node may receive a result from one or more worker nodes,and the control node may organize (e.g., collect and assemble) theresults received and compile them to produce a complete result for theproject received from the end user.

Any remaining control nodes, such as control nodes 404 and 406, may beassigned as backup control nodes for the project. In an embodiment,backup control nodes may not control any portion of the project.Instead, backup control nodes may serve as a backup for the primarycontrol node and take over as primary control node if the primarycontrol node were to fail. If a communications grid were to include onlya single control node, and the control node were to fail (e.g., thecontrol node is shut off or breaks) then the communications grid as awhole may fail and any project or job being run on the communicationsgrid may fail and may not complete. While the project may be run again,such a failure may cause a delay (severe delay in some cases, such asovernight delay) in completion of the project. Therefore, a grid withmultiple control nodes, including a backup control node, may bebeneficial.

To add another node or machine to the grid, the primary control node mayopen a pair of listening sockets, for example. A socket may be used toaccept work requests from clients, and the second socket may be used toaccept connections from other grid nodes. The primary control node maybe provided with a list of other nodes (e.g., other machines, computers,servers) that will participate in the grid, and the role that each nodewill fill in the grid. Upon startup of the primary control node (e.g.,the first node on the grid), the primary control node may use a networkprotocol to start the server process on every other node in the grid.Command line parameters, for example, may inform each node of one ormore pieces of information, such as: the role that the node will have inthe grid, the host name of the primary control node, the port number onwhich the primary control node is accepting connections from peer nodes,among others. The information may also be provided in a configurationfile, transmitted over a secure shell tunnel, recovered from aconfiguration server, among others. While the other machines in the gridmay not initially know about the configuration of the grid, thatinformation may also be sent to each other node by the primary controlnode. Updates of the grid information may also be subsequently sent tothose nodes.

For any control node other than the primary control node added to thegrid, the control node may open three sockets. The first socket mayaccept work requests from clients, the second socket may acceptconnections from other grid members, and the third socket may connect(e.g., permanently) to the primary control node. When a control node(e.g., primary control node) receives a connection from another controlnode, it first checks to see if the peer node is in the list ofconfigured nodes in the grid. If it is not on the list, the control nodemay clear the connection. If it is on the list, it may then attempt toauthenticate the connection. If authentication is successful, theauthenticating node may transmit information to its peer, such as theport number on which a node is listening for connections, the host nameof the node, information about how to authenticate the node, among otherinformation. When a node, such as the new control node, receivesinformation about another active node, it will check to see if italready has a connection to that other node. If it does not have aconnection to that node, it may then establish a connection to thatcontrol node.

Any worker node added to the grid may establish a connection to theprimary control node and any other control nodes on the grid. Afterestablishing the connection, it may authenticate itself to the grid(e.g., any control nodes, including both primary and backup, or a serveror user controlling the grid). After successful authentication, theworker node may accept configuration information from the control node.

When a node joins a communications grid (e.g., when the node is poweredon or connected to an existing node on the grid or both), the node isassigned (e.g., by an operating system of the grid) a universally uniqueidentifier (UUID). This unique identifier may help other nodes andexternal entities (devices, users, etc.) to identify the node anddistinguish it from other nodes. When a node is connected to the grid,the node may share its unique identifier with the other nodes in thegrid. Since each node may share its unique identifier, each node mayknow the unique identifier of every other node on the grid. Uniqueidentifiers may also designate a hierarchy of each of the nodes (e.g.,backup control nodes) within the grid. For example, the uniqueidentifiers of each of the backup control nodes may be stored in a listof backup control nodes to indicate an order in which the backup controlnodes will take over for a failed primary control node to become a newprimary control node. However, a hierarchy of nodes may also bedetermined using methods other than using the unique identifiers of thenodes. For example, the hierarchy may be predetermined, or may beassigned based on other predetermined factors.

The grid may add new machines at any time (e.g., initiated from anycontrol node). Upon adding a new node to the grid, the control node mayfirst add the new node to its table of grid nodes. The control node mayalso then notify every other control node about the new node. The nodesreceiving the notification may acknowledge that they have updated theirconfiguration information.

Primary control node 402 may, for example, transmit one or morecommunications to backup control nodes 404 and 406 (and, for example, toother control or worker nodes within the communications grid). Suchcommunications may sent periodically, at fixed time intervals, betweenknown fixed stages of the project's execution, among other protocols.The communications transmitted by primary control node 402 may be ofvaried types and may include a variety of types of information. Forexample, primary control node 402 may transmit snapshots (e.g., statusinformation) of the communications grid so that backup control node 404always has a recent snapshot of the communications grid. The snapshot orgrid status may include, for example, the structure of the grid(including, for example, the worker nodes in the grid, uniqueidentifiers of the nodes, or their relationships with the primarycontrol node) and the status of a project (including, for example, thestatus of each worker node's portion of the project). The snapshot mayalso include analysis or results received from worker nodes in thecommunications grid. The backup control nodes may receive and store thebackup data received from the primary control node. The backup controlnodes may transmit a request for such a snapshot (or other information)from the primary control node, or the primary control node may send suchinformation periodically to the backup control nodes.

As noted, the backup data may allow the backup control node to take overas primary control node if the primary control node fails withoutrequiring the grid to start the project over from scratch. If theprimary control node fails, the backup control node that will take overas primary control node may retrieve the most recent version of thesnapshot received from the primary control node and use the snapshot tocontinue the project from the stage of the project indicated by thebackup data. This may prevent failure of the project as a whole.

A backup control node may use various methods to determine that theprimary control node has failed. In one example of such a method, theprimary control node may transmit (e.g., periodically) a communicationto the backup control node that indicates that the primary control nodeis working and has not failed, such as a heartbeat communication. Thebackup control node may determine that the primary control node hasfailed if the backup control node has not received a heartbeatcommunication for a certain predetermined period of time. Alternatively,a backup control node may also receive a communication from the primarycontrol node itself (before it failed) or from a worker node that theprimary control node has failed, for example because the primary controlnode has failed to communicate with the worker node.

Different methods may be performed to determine which backup controlnode of a set of backup control nodes (e.g., backup control nodes 404and 406) will take over for failed primary control node 402 and becomethe new primary control node. For example, the new primary control nodemay be chosen based on a ranking or “hierarchy” of backup control nodesbased on their unique identifiers. In an alternative embodiment, abackup control node may be assigned to be the new primary control nodeby another device in the communications grid or from an external device(e.g., a system infrastructure or an end user, such as a server orcomputer, controlling the communications grid). In another alternativeembodiment, the backup control node that takes over as the new primarycontrol node may be designated based on bandwidth or other statisticsabout the communications grid.

A worker node within the communications grid may also fail. If a workernode fails, work being performed by the failed worker node may beredistributed amongst the operational worker nodes. In an alternativeembodiment, the primary control node may transmit a communication toeach of the operable worker nodes still on the communications grid thateach of the worker nodes should purposefully fail also. After each ofthe worker nodes fail, they may each retrieve their most recent savedcheckpoint of their status and re-start the project from that checkpointto minimize lost progress on the project being executed.

FIG. 5 illustrates a flow chart showing an example process 500 foradjusting a communications grid or a work project in a communicationsgrid after a failure of a node, according to embodiments of the presenttechnology. The process may include, for example, receiving grid statusinformation including a project status of a portion of a project beingexecuted by a node in the communications grid, as described in operation502. For example, a control node (e.g., a backup control node connectedto a primary control node and a worker node on a communications grid)may receive grid status information, where the grid status informationincludes a project status of the primary control node or a projectstatus of the worker node. The project status of the primary controlnode and the project status of the worker node may include a status ofone or more portions of a project being executed by the primary andworker nodes in the communications grid. The process may also includestoring the grid status information, as described in operation 504. Forexample, a control node (e.g., a backup control node) may store thereceived grid status information locally within the control node.Alternatively, the grid status information may be sent to another devicefor storage where the control node may have access to the information.

The process may also include receiving a failure communicationcorresponding to a node in the communications grid in operation 506. Forexample, a node may receive a failure communication including anindication that the primary control node has failed, prompting a backupcontrol node to take over for the primary control node. In analternative embodiment, a node may receive a failure that a worker nodehas failed, prompting a control node to reassign the work beingperformed by the worker node. The process may also include reassigning anode or a portion of the project being executed by the failed node, asdescribed in operation 508. For example, a control node may designatethe backup control node as a new primary control node based on thefailure communication upon receiving the failure communication. If thefailed node is a worker node, a control node may identify a projectstatus of the failed worker node using the snapshot of thecommunications grid, where the project status of the failed worker nodeincludes a status of a portion of the project being executed by thefailed worker node at the failure time.

The process may also include receiving updated grid status informationbased on the reassignment, as described in operation 510, andtransmitting a set of instructions based on the updated grid statusinformation to one or more nodes in the communications grid, asdescribed in operation 512. The updated grid status information mayinclude an updated project status of the primary control node or anupdated project status of the worker node. The updated information maybe transmitted to the other nodes in the grid to update their stalestored information.

FIG. 6 illustrates a portion of a communications grid computing system600 including a control node and a worker node, according to embodimentsof the present technology. Communications grid 600 computing systemincludes one control node (control node 602) and one worker node (workernode 610) for purposes of illustration, but may include more workerand/or control nodes. The control node 602 is communicatively connectedto worker node 610 via communication path 650. Therefore, control node602 may transmit information (e.g., related to the communications gridor notifications), to and receive information from worker node 610 viapath 650.

Similar to in FIG. 4, communications grid computing system (or just“communications grid”) 600 includes data processing nodes (control node602 and worker node 610). Nodes 602 and 610 comprise multi-core dataprocessors. Each node 602 and 610 includes a grid-enabled softwarecomponent (GESC) 620 that executes on the data processor associated withthat node and interfaces with buffer memory 622 also associated withthat node. Each node 602 and 610 includes a database management software(DBMS) 628 that executes on a database server (not shown) at controlnode 602 and on a database server (not shown) at worker node 610.

Each node also includes a data store 624. Data stores 624, similar tonetwork-attached data stores 110 in FIG. 1 and data stores 235 in FIG.2, are used to store data to be processed by the nodes in the computingenvironment. Data stores 624 may also store any intermediate or finaldata generated by the computing system after being processed, forexample in non-volatile memory. However in certain embodiments, theconfiguration of the grid computing environment allows its operations tobe performed such that intermediate and final data results can be storedsolely in volatile memory (e.g., RAM), without a requirement thatintermediate or final data results be stored to non-volatile types ofmemory. Storing such data in volatile memory may be useful in certainsituations, such as when the grid receives queries (e.g., ad hoc) from aclient and when responses, which are generated by processing largeamounts of data, need to be generated quickly or on-the-fly. In such asituation, the grid may be configured to retain the data within memoryso that responses can be generated at different levels of detail and sothat a client may interactively query against this information.

Each node also includes a user-defined function (UDF) 626. The UDFprovides a mechanism for the DMBS 628 to transfer data to or receivedata from the database stored in the data stores 624 that are managed bythe DBMS. For example, UDF 626 can be invoked by the DBMS to providedata to the GESC for processing. The UDF 626 may establish a socketconnection (not shown) with the GESC to transfer the data.Alternatively, the UDF 626 can transfer data to the GESC by writing datato shared memory accessible by both the UDF and the GESC.

The GESC 620 at the nodes 602 and 620 may be connected via a network,such as network 108 shown in FIG. 1. Therefore, nodes 602 and 620 cancommunicate with each other via the network using a predeterminedcommunication protocol such as, for example, the Message PassingInterface (MPI). Each GESC 620 can engage in point-to-pointcommunication with the GESC at another node or in collectivecommunication with multiple GESCs via the network. The GESC 620 at eachnode may contain identical (or nearly identical) software instructions.Each node may be capable of operating as either a control node or aworker node. The GESC at the control node 602 can communicate, over acommunication path 652, with a client deice 630. More specifically,control node 602 may communicate with client application 632 hosted bythe client device 630 to receive queries and to respond to those queriesafter processing large amounts of data.

DMBS 628 may control the creation, maintenance, and use of database ordata structure (not shown) within a nodes 602 or 610. The database mayorganize data stored in data stores 624. The DMBS 628 at control node602 may accept requests for data and transfer the appropriate data forthe request. With such a process, collections of data may be distributedacross multiple physical locations. In this example, each node 602 and610 stores a portion of the total data managed by the management systemin its associated data store 624.

Furthermore, the DBMS may be responsible for protecting against dataloss using replication techniques. Replication includes providing abackup copy of data stored on one node on one or more other nodes.Therefore, if one node fails, the data from the failed node can berecovered from a replicated copy residing at another node. However, asdescribed herein with respect to FIG. 4, data or status information foreach node in the communications grid may also be shared with each nodeon the grid.

FIG. 7 illustrates a flow chart showing an example method 700 forexecuting a project within a grid computing system, according toembodiments of the present technology. As described with respect to FIG.6, the GESC at the control node may transmit data with a client device(e.g., client device 630) to receive queries for executing a project andto respond to those queries after large amounts of data have beenprocessed. The query may be transmitted to the control node, where thequery may include a request for executing a project, as described inoperation 702. The query can contain instructions on the type of dataanalysis to be performed in the project and whether the project shouldbe executed using the grid-based computing environment, as shown inoperation 704.

To initiate the project, the control node may determine if the queryrequests use of the grid-based computing environment to execute theproject. If the determination is no, then the control node initiatesexecution of the project in a solo environment (e.g., at the controlnode), as described in operation 710. If the determination is yes, thecontrol node may initiate execution of the project in the grid-basedcomputing environment, as described in operation 706. In such asituation, the request may include a requested configuration of thegrid. For example, the request may include a number of control nodes anda number of worker nodes to be used in the grid when executing theproject. After the project has been completed, the control node maytransmit results of the analysis yielded by the grid, as described inoperation 708. Whether the project is executed in a solo or grid-basedenvironment, the control node provides the results of the project, asdescribed in operation 712.

As noted with respect to FIG. 2, the computing environments describedherein may collect data (e.g., as received from network devices, such assensors, such as network devices 204-209 in FIG. 2, and client devicesor other sources) to be processed as part of a data analytics project,and data may be received in real time as part of a streaming analyticsenvironment (e.g., ESP). Data may be collected using a variety ofsources as communicated via different kinds of networks or locally, suchas on a real-time streaming basis. For example, network devices mayreceive data periodically from network device sensors as the sensorscontinuously sense, monitor and track changes in their environments.More specifically, an increasing number of distributed applicationsdevelop or produce continuously flowing data from distributed sources byapplying queries to the data before distributing the data togeographically distributed recipients. An event stream processing engine(ESPE) may continuously apply the queries to the data as it is receivedand determines which entities should receive the data. Client or otherdevices may also subscribe to the ESPE or other devices processing ESPdata so that they can receive data after processing, based on forexample the entities determined by the processing engine. For example,client devices 230 in FIG. 2 may subscribe to the ESPE in computingenvironment 214. In another example, event subscription devices 1024a-c, described further with respect to FIG. 10, may also subscribe tothe ESPE. The ESPE may determine or define how input data or eventstreams from network devices or other publishers (e.g., network devices204-209 in FIG. 2) are transformed into meaningful output data to beconsumed by subscribers, such as for example client devices 230 in FIG.2.

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram including components of an EventStream Processing Engine (ESPE), according to embodiments of the presenttechnology. ESPE 800 may include one or more projects 802. A project maybe described as a second-level container in an engine model managed byESPE 800 where a thread pool size for the project may be defined by auser. Each project of the one or more projects 802 may include one ormore continuous queries 804 that contain data flows, which are datatransformations of incoming event streams. The one or more continuousqueries 804 may include one or more source windows 806 and one or morederived windows 808.

The ESPE may receive streaming data over a period of time related tocertain events, such as events or other data sensed by one or morenetwork devices. The ESPE may perform operations associated withprocessing data created by the one or more devices. For example, theESPE may receive data from the one or more network devices 204-209 shownin FIG. 2. As noted, the network devices may include sensors that sensedifferent aspects of their environments, and may collect data over timebased on those sensed observations. For example, the ESPE may beimplemented within one or more of machines 220 and 240 shown in FIG. 2.The ESPE may be implemented within such a machine by an ESP application.An ESP application may embed an ESPE with its own dedicated thread poolor pools into its application space where the main application threadcan do application-specific work and the ESPE processes event streams atleast by creating an instance of a model into processing objects.

The engine container is the top-level container in a model that managesthe resources of the one or more projects 802. In an illustrativeembodiment, for example, there may be only one ESPE 800 for eachinstance of the ESP application, and ESPE 800 may have a unique enginename. Additionally, the one or more projects 802 may each have uniqueproject names, and each query may have a unique continuous query nameand begin with a uniquely named source window of the one or more sourcewindows 806. ESPE 800 may or may not be persistent.

Continuous query modeling involves defining directed graphs of windowsfor event stream manipulation and transformation. A window in thecontext of event stream manipulation and transformation is a processingnode in an event stream processing model. A window in a continuous querycan perform aggregations, computations, pattern-matching, and otheroperations on data flowing through the window. A continuous query may bedescribed as a directed graph of source, relational, pattern matching,and procedural windows. The one or more source windows 806 and the oneor more derived windows 808 represent continuously executing queriesthat generate updates to a query result set as new event blocks streamthrough ESPE 800. A directed graph, for example, is a set of nodesconnected by edges, where the edges have a direction associated withthem.

An event object may be described as a packet of data accessible as acollection of fields, with at least one of the fields defined as a keyor unique identifier (ID). The event object may be created using avariety of formats including binary, alphanumeric, XML, etc. Each eventobject may include one or more fields designated as a primary identifier(ID) for the event so ESPE 800 can support operation codes (opcodes) forevents including insert, update, upsert, and delete. Upsert opcodesupdate the event if the key field already exists; otherwise, the eventis inserted. For illustration, an event object may be a packed binaryrepresentation of a set of field values and include both metadata andfield data associated with an event. The metadata may include an opcodeindicating if the event represents an insert, update, delete, or upsert,a set of flags indicating if the event is a normal, partial-update, or aretention generated event from retention policy management, and a set ofmicrosecond timestamps that can be used for latency measurements.

An event block object may be described as a grouping or package of eventobjects. An event stream may be described as a flow of event blockobjects. A continuous query of the one or more continuous queries 804transforms a source event stream made up of streaming event blockobjects published into ESPE 800 into one or more output event streamsusing the one or more source windows 806 and the one or more derivedwindows 808. A continuous query can also be thought of as data flowmodeling.

The one or more source windows 806 are at the top of the directed graphand have no windows feeding into them. Event streams are published intothe one or more source windows 806, and from there, the event streamsmay be directed to the next set of connected windows as defined by thedirected graph. The one or more derived windows 808 are all instantiatedwindows that are not source windows and that have other windowsstreaming events into them. The one or more derived windows 808 mayperform computations or transformations on the incoming event streams.The one or more derived windows 808 transform event streams based on thewindow type (that is operators such as join, filter, compute, aggregate,copy, pattern match, procedural, union, etc.) and window settings. Asevent streams are published into ESPE 800, they are continuouslyqueried, and the resulting sets of derived windows in these queries arecontinuously updated.

FIG. 9 illustrates a flow chart showing an example process includingoperations performed by an event stream processing engine, according tosome embodiments of the present technology. As noted, the ESPE 800 (oran associated ESP application) defines how input event streams aretransformed into meaningful output event streams. More specifically, theESP application may define how input event streams from publishers(e.g., network devices providing sensed data) are transformed intomeaningful output event streams consumed by subscribers (e.g., a dataanalytics project being executed by a machine or set of machines).

Within the application, a user may interact with one or more userinterface windows presented to the user in a display under control ofthe ESPE independently or through a browser application in an orderselectable by the user. For example, a user may execute an ESPapplication, which causes presentation of a first user interface window,which may include a plurality of menus and selectors such as drop downmenus, buttons, text boxes, hyperlinks, etc. associated with the ESPapplication as understood by a person of skill in the art. As furtherunderstood by a person of skill in the art, various operations may beperformed in parallel, for example, using a plurality of threads.

At operation 900, an ESP application may define and start an ESPE,thereby instantiating an ESPE at a device, such as machine 220 and/or240. In an operation 902, the engine container is created. Forillustration, ESPE 800 may be instantiated using a function call thatspecifies the engine container as a manager for the model.

In an operation 904, the one or more continuous queries 804 areinstantiated by ESPE 800 as a model. The one or more continuous queries804 may be instantiated with a dedicated thread pool or pools thatgenerate updates as new events stream through ESPE 800. Forillustration, the one or more continuous queries 804 may be created tomodel business processing logic within ESPE 800, to predict eventswithin ESPE 800, to model a physical system within ESPE 800, to predictthe physical system state within ESPE 800, etc. For example, as noted,ESPE 800 may be used to support sensor data monitoring and management(e.g., sensing may include force, torque, load, strain, position,temperature, air pressure, fluid flow, chemical properties, resistance,electromagnetic fields, radiation, irradiance, proximity, acoustics,moisture, distance, speed, vibrations, acceleration, electricalpotential, or electrical current, etc.).

ESPE 800 may analyze and process events in motion or “event streams.”Instead of storing data and running queries against the stored data,ESPE 800 may store queries and stream data through them to allowcontinuous analysis of data as it is received. The one or more sourcewindows 806 and the one or more derived windows 808 may be created basedon the relational, pattern matching, and procedural algorithms thattransform the input event streams into the output event streams tomodel, simulate, score, test, predict, etc. based on the continuousquery model defined and application to the streamed data.

In an operation 906, a publish/subscribe (pub/sub) capability isinitialized for ESPE 800. In an illustrative embodiment, a pub/subcapability is initialized for each project of the one or more projects802. To initialize and enable pub/sub capability for ESPE 800, a portnumber may be provided. Pub/sub clients can use a host name of an ESPdevice running the ESPE and the port number to establish pub/subconnections to ESPE 800.

FIG. 10 illustrates an ESP system 1000 interfacing between publishingdevice 1022 and event subscribing devices 1024 a-c, according toembodiments of the present technology. ESP system 1000 may include ESPdevice or subsystem 851, event publishing device 1022, an eventsubscribing device A 1024 a, an event subscribing device B 1024 b, andan event subscribing device C 1024 c. Input event streams are output toESP device 851 by publishing device 1022. In alternative embodiments,the input event streams may be created by a plurality of publishingdevices. The plurality of publishing devices further may publish eventstreams to other ESP devices. The one or more continuous queriesinstantiated by ESPE 800 may analyze and process the input event streamsto form output event streams output to event subscribing device A 1024a, event subscribing device B 1024 b, and event subscribing device C1024 c. ESP system 1000 may include a greater or a fewer number of eventsubscribing devices of event subscribing devices.

Publish-subscribe is a message-oriented interaction paradigm based onindirect addressing. Processed data recipients specify their interest inreceiving information from ESPE 800 by subscribing to specific classesof events, while information sources publish events to ESPE 800 withoutdirectly addressing the receiving parties. ESPE 800 coordinates theinteractions and processes the data. In some cases, the data sourcereceives confirmation that the published information has been receivedby a data recipient.

A publish/subscribe API may be described as a library that enables anevent publisher, such as publishing device 1022, to publish eventstreams into ESPE 800 or an event subscriber, such as event subscribingdevice A 1024 a, event subscribing device B 1024 b, and eventsubscribing device C 1024 c, to subscribe to event streams from ESPE800. For illustration, one or more publish/subscribe APIs may bedefined. Using the publish/subscribe API, an event publishingapplication may publish event streams into a running event streamprocessor project source window of ESPE 800, and the event subscriptionapplication may subscribe to an event stream processor project sourcewindow of ESPE 800.

The publish/subscribe API provides cross-platform connectivity andendianness compatibility between ESP application and other networkedapplications, such as event publishing applications instantiated atpublishing device 1022, and event subscription applications instantiatedat one or more of event subscribing device A 1024 a, event subscribingdevice B 1024 b, and event subscribing device C 1024 c.

Referring back to FIG. 9, operation 906 initializes thepublish/subscribe capability of ESPE 800. In an operation 908, the oneor more projects 802 are started. The one or more started projects mayrun in the background on an ESP device. In an operation 910, an eventblock object is received from one or more computing device of the eventpublishing device 1022.

ESP subsystem 800 may include a publishing client 1002, ESPE 800, asubscribing client A 1004, a subscribing client B 1006, and asubscribing client C 1008. Publishing client 1002 may be started by anevent publishing application executing at publishing device 1022 usingthe publish/subscribe API. Subscribing client A 1004 may be started byan event subscription application A, executing at event subscribingdevice A 1024 a using the publish/subscribe API. Subscribing client B1006 may be started by an event subscription application B executing atevent subscribing device B 1024 b using the publish/subscribe API.Subscribing client C 1008 may be started by an event subscriptionapplication C executing at event subscribing device C 1024 c using thepublish/subscribe API.

An event block object containing one or more event objects is injectedinto a source window of the one or more source windows 806 from aninstance of an event publishing application on event publishing device1022. The event block object may generated, for example, by the eventpublishing application and may be received by publishing client 1002. Aunique ID may be maintained as the event block object is passed betweenthe one or more source windows 806 and/or the one or more derivedwindows 808 of ESPE 800, and to subscribing client A 1004, subscribingclient B 1006, and subscribing client C 1008 and to event subscriptiondevice A 1024 a, event subscription device B 1024 b, and eventsubscription device C 1024 c. Publishing client 1002 may furthergenerate and include a unique embedded transaction ID in the event blockobject as the event block object is processed by a continuous query, aswell as the unique ID that publishing device 1022 assigned to the eventblock object.

In an operation 912, the event block object is processed through the oneor more continuous queries 804. In an operation 914, the processed eventblock object is output to one or more computing devices of the eventsubscribing devices 1024 a-c. For example, subscribing client A 1004,subscribing client B 1006, and subscribing client C 1008 may send thereceived event block object to event subscription device A 1024 a, eventsubscription device B 1024 b, and event subscription device C 1024 c,respectively.

ESPE 800 maintains the event block containership aspect of the receivedevent blocks from when the event block is published into a source windowand works its way through the directed graph defined by the one or morecontinuous queries 804 with the various event translations before beingoutput to subscribers. Subscribers can correlate a group of subscribedevents back to a group of published events by comparing the unique ID ofthe event block object that a publisher, such as publishing device 1022,attached to the event block object with the event block ID received bythe subscriber.

In an operation 916, a determination is made concerning whether or notprocessing is stopped. If processing is not stopped, processingcontinues in operation 910 to continue receiving the one or more eventstreams containing event block objects from the, for example, one ormore network devices. If processing is stopped, processing continues inan operation 918. In operation 918, the started projects are stopped. Inoperation 920, the ESPE is shutdown.

As noted, in some embodiments, big data is processed for an analyticsproject after the data is received and stored. In other embodiments,distributed applications process continuously flowing data in real-timefrom distributed sources by applying queries to the data beforedistributing the data to geographically distributed recipients. Asnoted, an event stream processing engine (ESPE) may continuously applythe queries to the data as it is received and determines which entitiesreceive the processed data. This allows for large amounts of data beingreceived and/or collected in a variety of environments to be processedand distributed in real time. For example, as shown with respect to FIG.2, data may be collected from network devices that may include deviceswithin the internet of things, such as devices within a home automationnetwork. However, such data may be collected from a variety of differentresources in a variety of different environments. In any such situation,embodiments of the present technology allow for real-time processing ofsuch data.

Aspects of the current disclosure provide technical solutions totechnical problems, such as computing problems that arise when an ESPdevice fails which results in a complete service interruption andpotentially significant data loss. The data loss can be catastrophicwhen the streamed data is supporting mission critical operations such asthose in support of an ongoing manufacturing or drilling operation. Anembodiment of an ESP system achieves a rapid and seamless failover ofESPE running at the plurality of ESP devices without serviceinterruption or data loss, thus significantly improving the reliabilityof an operational system that relies on the live or real-time processingof the data streams. The event publishing systems, the event subscribingsystems, and each ESPE not executing at a failed ESP device are notaware of or effected by the failed ESP device. The ESP system mayinclude thousands of event publishing systems and event subscribingsystems. The ESP system keeps the failover logic and awareness withinthe boundaries of out-messaging network connector and out-messagingnetwork device.

In one example embodiment, a system is provided to support a failoverwhen event stream processing (ESP) event blocks. The system includes,but is not limited to, an out-messaging network device and a computingdevice. The computing device includes, but is not limited to, aprocessor and a computer-readable medium operably coupled to theprocessor. The processor is configured to execute an ESP engine (ESPE).The computer-readable medium has instructions stored thereon that, whenexecuted by the processor, cause the computing device to support thefailover. An event block object is received from the ESPE that includesa unique identifier. A first status of the computing device as active orstandby is determined. When the first status is active, a second statusof the computing device as newly active or not newly active isdetermined. Newly active is determined when the computing device isswitched from a standby status to an active status. When the secondstatus is newly active, a last published event block object identifierthat uniquely identifies a last published event block object isdetermined. A next event block object is selected from a non-transitorycomputer-readable medium accessible by the computing device. The nextevent block object has an event block object identifier that is greaterthan the determined last published event block object identifier. Theselected next event block object is published to an out-messagingnetwork device. When the second status of the computing device is notnewly active, the received event block object is published to theout-messaging network device. When the first status of the computingdevice is standby, the received event block object is stored in thenon-transitory computer-readable medium.

FIG. 11 is a flow chart of an example of a process for generating andusing a machine-learning model according to some aspects. Machinelearning is a branch of artificial intelligence that relates tomathematical models that can learn from, categorize, and makepredictions about data. Such mathematical models, which can be referredto as machine-learning models, can classify input data among two or moreclasses; cluster input data among two or more groups; predict a resultbased on input data; identify patterns or trends in input data; identifya distribution of input data in a space; or any combination of these.Examples of machine-learning models can include (i) neural networks;(ii) decision trees, such as classification trees and regression trees;(iii) classifiers, such as Naïve bias classifiers, logistic regressionclassifiers, ridge regression classifiers, random forest classifiers,least absolute shrinkage and selector (LASSO) classifiers, and supportvector machines; (iv) clusterers, such as k-means clusterers, mean-shiftclusterers, and spectral clusterers; (v) factorizers, such asfactorization machines, principal component analyzers and kernelprincipal component analyzers; and (vi) ensembles or other combinationsof machine-learning models. In some examples, neural networks caninclude deep neural networks, feed-forward neural networks, recurrentneural networks, convolutional neural networks, radial basis function(RBF) neural networks, echo state neural networks, long short-termmemory neural networks, bi-directional recurrent neural networks, gatedneural networks, hierarchical recurrent neural networks, stochasticneural networks, modular neural networks, spiking neural networks,dynamic neural networks, cascading neural networks, neuro-fuzzy neuralnetworks, or any combination of these.

Different machine-learning models may be used interchangeably to performa task. Examples of tasks that can be performed at least partially usingmachine-learning models include various types of scoring;bioinformatics; cheminformatics; software engineering; fraud detection;customer segmentation; generating online recommendations; adaptivewebsites; determining customer lifetime value; search engines; placingadvertisements in real time or near real time; classifying DNAsequences; affective computing; performing natural language processingand understanding; object recognition and computer vision; roboticlocomotion; playing games; optimization and metaheuristics; detectingnetwork intrusions; medical diagnosis and monitoring; or predicting whenan asset, such as a machine, will need maintenance.

Any number and combination of tools can be used to createmachine-learning models. Examples of tools for creating and managingmachine-learning models can include SAS® Enterprise Miner, SAS® RapidPredictive Modeler, and SAS® Model Manager, SAS Cloud Analytic Services(CAS)®, SAS Viya® of all which are by SAS Institute Inc. of Cary, N.C.

Machine-learning models can be constructed through an at least partiallyautomated (e.g., with little or no human involvement) process calledtraining. During training, input data can be iteratively supplied to amachine-learning model to enable the machine-learning model to identifypatterns related to the input data or to identify relationships betweenthe input data and output data. With training, the machine-learningmodel can be transformed from an untrained state to a trained state.Input data can be split into one or more training sets and one or morevalidation sets, and the training process may be repeated multipletimes. The splitting may follow a k-fold cross-validation rule, aleave-one-out-rule, a leave-p-out rule, or a holdout rule. An overviewof training and using a machine-learning model is described below withrespect to the flow chart of FIG. 11.

In block 1104, training data is received. In some examples, the trainingdata is received from a remote database or a local database, constructedfrom various subsets of data, or input by a user. The training data canbe used in its raw form for training a machine-learning model orpre-processed into another form, which can then be used for training themachine-learning model. For example, the raw form of the training datacan be smoothed, truncated, aggregated, clustered, or otherwisemanipulated into another form, which can then be used for training themachine-learning model.

In block 1106, a machine-learning model is trained using the trainingdata. The machine-learning model can be trained in a supervised,unsupervised, or semi-supervised manner. In supervised training, eachinput in the training data is correlated to a desired output. Thisdesired output may be a scalar, a vector, or a different type of datastructure such as text or an image. This may enable the machine-learningmodel to learn a mapping between the inputs and desired outputs. Inunsupervised training, the training data includes inputs, but notdesired outputs, so that the machine-learning model has to findstructure in the inputs on its own. In semi-supervised training, onlysome of the inputs in the training data are correlated to desiredoutputs.

In block 1108, the machine-learning model is evaluated. For example, anevaluation dataset can be obtained, for example, via user input or froma database. The evaluation dataset can include inputs correlated todesired outputs. The inputs can be provided to the machine-learningmodel and the outputs from the machine-learning model can be compared tothe desired outputs. If the outputs from the machine-learning modelclosely correspond with the desired outputs, the machine-learning modelmay have a high degree of accuracy. For example, if 90% or more of theoutputs from the machine-learning model are the same as the desiredoutputs in the evaluation dataset, the machine-learning model may have ahigh degree of accuracy. Otherwise, the machine-learning model may havea low degree of accuracy. The 90% number is an example only. A realisticand desirable accuracy percentage is dependent on the problem and thedata.

In some examples, if the machine-learning model has an inadequate degreeof accuracy for a particular task, the process can return to block 1106,where the machine-learning model can be further trained using additionaltraining data or otherwise modified to improve accuracy. If themachine-learning model has an adequate degree of accuracy for theparticular task, the process can continue to block 1110.

In block 1110, new data is received. In some examples, the new data isreceived from a remote database or a local database, constructed fromvarious subsets of data, or input by a user. The new data may be unknownto the machine-learning model. For example, the machine-learning modelmay not have previously processed or analyzed the new data.

In block 1112, the trained machine-learning model is used to analyze thenew data and provide a result. For example, the new data can be providedas input to the trained machine-learning model. The trainedmachine-learning model can analyze the new data and provide a resultthat includes a classification of the new data into a particular class,a clustering of the new data into a particular group, a prediction basedon the new data, or any combination of these.

In block 1114, the result is post-processed. For example, the result canbe added to, multiplied with, or otherwise combined with other data aspart of a job. As another example, the result can be transformed from afirst format, such as a time series format, into another format, such asa count series format. Any number and combination of operations can beperformed on the result during post-processing.

A more specific example of a machine-learning model is the neuralnetwork 1200 shown in FIG. 12. The neural network 1200 is represented asmultiple layers of interconnected neurons, such as neuron 1208, that canexchange data between one another. The layers include an input layer1202 for receiving input data, a hidden layer 1204, and an output layer1206 for providing a result. The hidden layer 1204 is referred to ashidden because it may not be directly observable or have its inputdirectly accessible during the normal functioning of the neural network1200. Although the neural network 1200 is shown as having a specificnumber of layers and neurons for exemplary purposes, the neural network1200 can have any number and combination of layers, and each layer canhave any number and combination of neurons.

The neurons and connections between the neurons can have numericweights, which can be tuned during training. For example, training datacan be provided to the input layer 1202 of the neural network 1200, andthe neural network 1200 can use the training data to tune one or morenumeric weights of the neural network 1200. In some examples, the neuralnetwork 1200 can be trained using backpropagation. Backpropagation caninclude determining a gradient of a particular numeric weight based on adifference between an actual output of the neural network 1200 and adesired output of the neural network 1200. Based on the gradient, one ormore numeric weights of the neural network 1200 can be updated to reducethe difference, thereby increasing the accuracy of the neural network1200. This process can be repeated multiple times to train the neuralnetwork 1200. For example, this process can be repeated hundreds orthousands of times to train the neural network 1200.

In some examples, the neural network 1200 is a feed-forward neuralnetwork. In a feed-forward neural network, every neuron only propagatesan output value to a subsequent layer of the neural network 1200. Forexample, data may only move one direction (forward) from one neuron tothe next neuron in a feed-forward neural network.

In other examples, the neural network 1200 is a recurrent neuralnetwork. A recurrent neural network can include one or more feedbackloops, allowing data to propagate in both forward and backward throughthe neural network 1200. This can allow for information to persistwithin the recurrent neural network. For example, a recurrent neuralnetwork can determine an output based at least partially on informationthat the recurrent neural network has seen before, giving the recurrentneural network the ability to use previous input to inform the output.

In some examples, the neural network 1200 operates by receiving a vectorof numbers from one layer; transforming the vector of numbers into a newvector of numbers using a matrix of numeric weights, a nonlinearity, orboth; and providing the new vector of numbers to a subsequent layer ofthe neural network 1200. Each subsequent layer of the neural network1200 can repeat this process until the neural network 1200 outputs afinal result at the output layer 1206. For example, the neural network1200 can receive a vector of numbers as an input at the input layer1202. The neural network 1200 can multiply the vector of numbers by amatrix of numeric weights to determine a weighted vector. The matrix ofnumeric weights can be tuned during the training of the neural network1200. The neural network 1200 can transform the weighted vector using anonlinearity, such as a sigmoid tangent or the hyperbolic tangent. Insome examples, the nonlinearity can include a rectified linear unit,which can be expressed using the equation y=max(x, 0) where y is theoutput and x is an input value from the weighted vector. The transformedoutput can be supplied to a subsequent layer, such as the hidden layer1204, of the neural network 1200. The subsequent layer of the neuralnetwork 1200 can receive the transformed output, multiply thetransformed output by a matrix of numeric weights and a nonlinearity,and provide the result to yet another layer of the neural network 1200.This process continues until the neural network 1200 outputs a finalresult at the output layer 1206.

Other examples of the present disclosure may include any number andcombination of machine-learning models having any number and combinationof characteristics. The machine-learning model(s) can be trained in asupervised, semi-supervised, or unsupervised manner, or any combinationof these. The machine-learning model(s) can be implemented using asingle computing device or multiple computing devices, such as thecommunications grid computing system 400 discussed above.

Implementing some examples of the present disclosure at least in part byusing machine-learning models can reduce the total number of processingiterations, time, memory, electrical power, or any combination of theseconsumed by a computing device when analyzing data. For example, aneural network may more readily identify patterns in data than otherapproaches. This may enable the neural network to analyze the data usingfewer processing cycles and less memory than other approaches, whileobtaining a similar or greater level of accuracy.

FIG. 13A illustrates a block diagram of an example embodiment of adistributed processing system 2000 incorporating one or more datadevices 2100, one or more node devices 2300 that form of a device grid2003, a coordinating device 2500 and/or a viewing device 2700 coupled bya network 2999. FIG. 13B illustrates a block diagram of an alternateexample embodiment of the distributed processing system 2000 in whichthe coordinating device 2500 may perform the functions of the devicegrid 2003. In both of the embodiments of FIGS. 13A and 13B, thecoordinating device 2500 may provide a graphical user interface (GUI) bywhich an operator may be guided through comparing multiple experimentdesigns, selecting an experiment design from among the comparedexperiment designs, performing a regression analysis of the selectedexperiment design, and/or performing the selected experiment design. Invarious embodiments, the provision of the GUI may be directly by thecoordinating device 2500 or through the viewing device 2700. In variousembodiments, the regression analysis may be performed by the device grid2003 or multiple processors and/or processor cores of the coordinatingdevice 2500. In some embodiments, the one or more data devices maydirectly perform the selected experiment design with the studied system.

In support of such operations, the devices 2100, 2300, 2500 and/or 2700may exchange one or more design profiles and/or other data concerningone or more experiment designs via the network 2999. In variousembodiments, the network 2999 may be a single network that may extendwithin a single building or other relatively limited area, a combinationof connected networks that may extend a considerable distance, and/ormay include the Internet. Thus, the network 2999 may be based on any ofa variety (or combination) of communications technologies by whichcommunications may be effected, including without limitation, wiredtechnologies employing electrically and/or optically conductive cabling,and wireless technologies employing infrared, radio frequency (RF) orother forms of wireless transmission.

In various embodiments, each of the data devices 2100 may incorporateone or more of a processor 2150, a storage 2160, measuring device(s)2120, effecting device(s) 2180, and a network interface 2190 to coupleeach of the data devices 2100 to the network 2999. The storage 2160 maystore a control routine 2140, one or more data sets 2130, a selecteddesign profile 2135, and/or results data 2730. The control routine 2140may incorporate a sequence of instructions operative on the processor2150 of each of the data devices 2100 to implement logic to performvarious functions, at least partially in parallel with the processors2150 of others of the data devices 2100. In executing the controlroutine 2140, the processor 2150 of each of the data devices 2100 mayoperate the network interface 2190 thereof to receive items ofobservation data captured by other devices (not shown) via the network2999, and may store such items of observation data as one or more of thedata sets 2130. Such other devices may include sensors or other forms ofmeasuring device that monitor an aspect of a system under study, and mayeach transmit captured items of observation data to the one or more datadevices 2100 for aggregation and/or storage. Alternatively oradditionally, the processor 2150 of each of the data devices 2100 mayoperate one or more of the measuring devices 2120 that may beincorporated into one or more of the data devices 2100 to more directlycapture such items of observation data, and may store such items ofobservation data as one or more of the data sets 2130.

Each of the measuring devices 2120 that may be incorporated into the oneor more data devices 2100, and/or each remote device from which the oneor more data devices 2100 may receive captured observation data via thenetwork 2999, may be any of a variety of types of sensor or other datacollecting device. Such sensors or other data collection devices mayinclude, and are not limited to, any of a variety of physical and/orchemical sensors that measure aspects of a manufacturing or chemicalprocess; any of a variety of electrical and/or optical energy sensorsthat measure aspects of transmission and/or reception of electricaland/or optical signals; any of a variety of manual input devices thataccept manually entered observations made by personnel; etc. Inembodiments in which the one or more data devices 2100 are involved incontrolling the studied system such that the one or more data devices2100 may incorporate one or more of the effecting devices 2180, each ofthe effecting devices 2180 may be any of a variety of types ofcontrollable output device by which the one or more data devices 2100may control one or more factors of the studied system. Such controllableoutput devices may include, and are not limited to, robotic endeffectors to manipulate objects (e.g., grips, motors, solenoids, etc.),pumps and/or valves to selectively introduce chemical compounds,electrical and/or optical signal output devices, heaters and/or coolers,vibratory and/or acoustic output devices, radio frequency and/ormagnetic emission devices, etc.

Each of the one or more data sets 2130 may include any of a wide varietyof types of observation data concerning a studied system, including andnot limited to, times, dates and/or locations of operation or use of thestudied system; indications of aspects about the studied system that maydifferentiate the particular studied system from other similar studiedsystems; and/or captured observations of factors that are inputs to thestudied system and responses that are outputs of the studied system.Each of the data sets 2130 may be divided into multiple data setportions 2131 that may each include captured observation data that maybe so divided by times, dates and/or locations at which the items ofobservation data therein were captured. Alternatively or additionally,each of the data sets 2130 may be divided into multiple data setportions 2131 based on random samples taken of items of observation datatherefrom to provide smaller, yet statistically representative, portionsof each of the data sets 2130 that may be used in as an input to theguidance provided by the coordinating device 2500 in selecting anexperiment design and/or in performing a regression test of a selectedexperiment design. The studied system may be any of a variety ofsystems, including and not limited to, chemical processes, sub-atomicparticle interactions, biomechanical and/or biochemical systems,geological systems, meteorological systems, manufacturing systems,electrical and/or optical networks, group egress behaviors in responseto fire emergencies in public spaces, etc. The impetus to apply thesetechniques may be the observation of undesired responses of a studiedsystem leading to a desire to identify the one or more factors of thestudied system that are linked to those undesired responses.Alternatively or additionally, the impetus may include the desire toderive changes to make to the identified factors that may bring aboutmore desirable responses from the studied system.

Each data set 2130 may be stored as one or more data files, and/or asone or more instances of at least one other type of data structure, in adistributed manner among multiple ones of the data devices 2100. Suchdistributed storage of a data set 2130 may be carried out to provideredundancy in its storage as a protection against data loss arising froma malfunction or other events associated with one or more of the datadevices 2100. Alternatively or additionally, in embodiments in which adata set 2130 is of considerably large size, such distributed storage ofa data set 2130 may be carried out to improve the speed and efficiencywith which it is able to be accessed and/or exchanged with otherdevices, including with the coordination device 2500 and/or the multiplenode devices 2300 of the node device grid 2003. Indeed, a data set 2130may be sufficiently large that there may be no single storage deviceavailable that has sufficient storage and/or throughput capacity.

In various embodiments, the viewing device 2700 incorporates one or moreof a processor 2750, a storage 2760, an input device 2720, a display2780, and a network interface 2790 to couple the viewing device 2700 tothe network 2999. The storage 2760 may store one or both of a controlroutine 2740 and the results data 2730. The control routine 2740 mayincorporate a sequence of instructions operative on the processor 2750to implement logic to perform various functions. The processor 2750 maybe caused by its execution of the control routine 2740 to operate theinput device 2720, the display 2780 and/or the network interface 2790 ina manner that causes the viewing device 2700 to enable the coordinatingdevice to remote provide the GUI. Alternatively or additionally, theprocessor 2780 may be caused to operate the network interface 2790 toreceive the results data 2730 providing results of a regression analysisof a selected experiment design, may be caused to generate avisualization based on the results data 2730, and/or may be caused tooperate the display 2780 to present the visualization on the display2780.

Turning more specifically to FIG. 13A, each of the node devices 2300 mayincorporate one or more of a processor 2350, a storage 2360 and anetwork interface 2390 to couple each of the node devices 2300 to thenetwork 2999. The processor 2350 of each of the node devices 2300 mayincorporate one or more processing cores 2355. The storage 2360 maystore one or more of a regression routine 2370, the selected designprofile 2135, data set portion(s) 2131 and/or the results data 2730.Within each of the multiple node devices 2300, the regression routine2370 may incorporate a sequence of instructions operative on theprocessor 2350 to implement logic to perform various functions. Theprocessor 2350 of each of the node devices 2300 may be caused by itsexecution of the regression routine 2370 to operate the networkinterface 2390 to receive the selected design profile 2135 from thecoordinating device 2500 and/or to receive at least one of the data setportions 2131 from the one or more data devices 2100. The processor 2350of each of the node devices 2300 may then employ the observation data ofthe studied system within the at least one data set portion 2131 and/orthe information about a selected experiment design within the selecteddesign profile 2135 to perform a regression analysis with the selectedexperiment design under the control of the coordinating device 2500. Inso doing, the processor 2350 of one or more of the node devices 2300 maygenerate at least a portion of the results data 2730 providing anindication of the results of the regression analysis, and may operatethe network interface 2390 to transmit the results data 2730 to thecoordinating device 2500 and/or the viewing device 2700.

In various embodiments, the coordinating device 2500 may incorporate aprocessor 2550, a storage 2560, an input device 2520, a display 2580,and a network interface 2590 to couple the coordinating device 2500 tothe network 2999. The storage 2560 may store one or more of a generationroutine 2510, a design routine 2540, a regression routine 2570, designprofile data 2530 that includes one or more design profiles 2531, theselected design profile 2135, vocabulary data 2533, rules data 2535 andthe results data 2730. Each of the generation routine 2510, the designroutine 2540 and the regression routine 2570 may incorporate a sequenceof instructions operative on the processor 2550 to implement logic toperform various functions.

In executing the generation routine 2510, the processor 2550 may becaused to operate the input device 2520 and/or the display 2580 tolocally provide a GUI to guide an operator through providing parametersto define an experiment design and associated model, and to storeindications of that definition as one of the design profiles 2531 withinthe design profile data 2530. Alternatively, the processor 2550 may becaused by the generation routine 2510 to operate the network interface2590 to remotely provide such a GUI through the network 2999 and anotherdevice, such as the viewing device 2700. Also, in executing the designroutine 2540, the processor 2550 may be caused to similarly provideanother GUI, either locally or remotely, to guide an operator throughproviding parameters to perform various comparisons between two or moreexperiment designs, and thereby guide the operator through theconsideration of various aspects of the compared experiment designs inselecting an experiment design to be performed. Further, in executingthe regression routine 2570, the processor 2550 may be caused to providestill another GUI, either locally or remotely, to guide an operatorthrough providing parameters to control aspects of the performance of aregression analysis with the selected experiment design. In so doing,the processor 2550 may be caused to operate the network interface 2590to distribute and coordinate the performance of the regression analysisamong the multiple node devices 2300 through the distribution of theselected design profile 2135 thereamong, and may be caused to furtheroperate the network interface 2590 to receive the results data 2730indicating the results of the regression analysis.

Turning more specifically to FIG. 13B, as an alternative to the multiplenode devices 2300 of the embodiment of the distributed processing system2000 of FIG. 13A, an alternate embodiment of the coordinating device2500 in the embodiment of the distributed processing system 2000 of FIG.13B may additionally incorporate one or more of the processors 2350,and/or may incorporate the storage 2360. The storage 2360 may store oneor more of the regression routine 2370, the selected design profile 2135and the data set portion(s) 2131. In this alternate embodiment of thecoordinating device 2500, each of the one or more processors 2350 may bea graphics processing unit (GPU) incorporating a relatively largequantity of the processing cores 2355 to take the place of the nodedevice grid 2003 in the embodiment of the distributed processing system2000 of FIG. 13A.

As will be familiar to those skilled in the art, there is anincreasingly commonplace trend toward replacing grids of numerousseparate computing devices with a single computing device equipped witha relatively small number of GPUs (e.g., under a dozen) to utilize theconsiderably higher degree of parallelism supported by their internalarchitectures, including what may be support for dozens, hundreds,thousands, or still greater quantities of threads of execution. Overtime, the characteristics of the operations that need to be performed tomore quickly render graphical images of ever high resolutions and colordepths have encouraged the development of GPUs that incorporate numerousprocessing cores that each have relatively limited instruction sets, butwhich are able to perform those limited instructions in parallel acrossa relatively large number of threads. It has been found that, where atleast a portion of an analysis is amenable to being performed usingGPU(s), a considerable increase in speed of performance of such analysesand/or the elimination of the need for a whole grid of separatecomputing devices may be realized by doing so. Thus, the processor 2550of the coordinating device may distribute the selected design data 2135and/or coordinate the provision of the one or more data set portions2131 to one or more of the storages 2360 for access by the one or moreprocessors 2350 to enable such a widely parallel performance of theregression analysis of a selected experiment design.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of performing a combination of generatingone or more experiment designs, selecting from among multiple comparedexperiment designs, performing a regression analysis with a selectedexperiment design, and/or performing the selected experiment design.More specifically, FIG. 14 illustrates aspects of the manner in whichthe routines 2510, 2540, 2570 and/or 2370 may be executed cooperativelywithin embodiments of the distributed processing system 2000 of eitherof FIG. 13A or 13B to provide a series of GUIs 3100, 3400 and 3700 tovisually guide the selection of an experiment design for use in testingaspects of a studied system.

As recognizable to those skilled in the art, each of the control routine2140, the regression routine 2370, the generation routine 2510, thedesign routine 2540 and the regression routines 2570, including thecomponents of which each may be composed, are selected to be operativeon whatever type of processor or processors that are selected toimplement applicable ones of the processors 2150, 2350 and/or 2550. Invarious embodiments, each of these routines may include one or more ofan operating system, device drivers and/or application-level routines(e.g., so-called “software suites” provided on disc media, “applets”obtained from a remote server, etc.). Where an operating system isincluded, the operating system may be any of a variety of availableoperating systems appropriate for execution by the processors 2150, 2350and/or 2550. Where one or more device drivers are included, those devicedrivers may provide support for any of a variety of other components,whether hardware or software components, of the data devices 2100, thenode devices 2300 and/or the coordinating device 2500.

As has been discussed, in executing the generation routine 2510, theprocessor 2550 of the coordinating device 2500 may be caused, eitherlocally through the input device 2520 and/or the display 2580 of thecoordinating device 2500, or remotely through the input device 2720and/or the display 2780 of the viewing device 2700, to provide a GUI3100 to guide an operator through providing parameters to define anexperiment design and associated model. The processor 2550 may then becaused to store add the definition of that experiment design andassociated model as one of the design profiles 2531 of the designprofile data 2530 stored within the storage 2560 of the coordinatingdevice 2500.

In executing the design routine 2540, the processor 2550 of thecoordinating device 2500 may also be caused, either locally or remotelythrough the viewing device 2700, to similarly provide another GUI 3400to guide an operator through selecting one or more of the experimentdesigns defined in corresponding ones of the design profiles 2531 to becompared. As will be explained in greater detail, following theselection of two or more experiment designs to be so compared, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to perform an automated matching betweenfactors and/or terms between the experiment designs to be compared basedon characteristics of the factors and/or the terms, and/or additionallybased on the texts of identifiers assigned to each of the factors and/orterms. In so doing, the processor 2550 may be caused to employ variousmatching rules retrieved from the rules data 2535 and/or indications ofknown synonyms retrieved from the vocabulary data 2533.

Also in providing the GUI 3400, the processor 2550 may be caused toguide the operator through providing parameters for the performance ofthe comparison, thereby guiding the operator through the considerationof various aspects of the compared experiment designs in selecting anexperiment design to be subjected to regression analysis and/orperformed. In so doing, the processor 2550 may be caused to employvarious templates retrieved from the rules data 2535 to generate andvisually present various sets of graphs of corresponding aspects of thecompared designs. One or more of the sets of graphs may advantageouslyexploit various features of the HVS to improve the ease and/or speedwith which similarities and/or differences among the compared designsare able to be recognized, thereby speeding the selection of one of thecompared designs.

In executing the regression routine 2570, the processor 2550 of thecoordinating device 2500 may be caused, either locally or remotelythrough the viewing device 2700, to similarly provide still another GUI3700 to guide an operator through providing parameters to controlaspects of the performance of a regression analysis with the selectedexperiment design. In so doing, the processor 2550 may be caused togenerate a sequence of instructions that are executable by theprocessors 2550 and/or 2350 perform the regression analysis, and mayinclude such a sequence of instructions in the selected design profile2135. In so doing, the processor 2550 may be caused to employ varioustemplates retrieved from the rules data 2535 to generate and visuallypresent a human readable portion of the executable instructions forperforming the regression analysis.

The processor 2550 may then be caused to operate the network interface2590 to distribute the selected design profile 2135 and coordinate theperformance of the regression analysis among the multiple node devices2300, and may be caused to further operate the network interface 2590 toreceive the results data 2730 indicating the results of the regressionanalysis. Alternatively, the processor 2550 may be caused to distributethe selected design profile 2135 and coordinate the performance of theregression analysis among multiple processing cores 2355 of one or moreprocessors 2350 incorporated within the coordinating device 2300. Theone or more processors 2350, either within the node devices 2300 orwithin the coordinating device 2500 may then be caused by theirexecution of the regression routine 2370 to perform the regressionanalysis using simulated data and/or one or more of the data setportions 2131.

Following performance of the regression analysis, the processor 2550 maybe further caused to coordinate the presentation of the results data2730 to the operator. Alternatively or additionally, the processor 2550may be further caused to operate the network interface 2590 to transmitthe selected design profile 2135 to the one or more data devices 2100 aspart of coordinating the performance of the selected experiment designby the one or more data devices 2100 in embodiments in which the one ormore data devices 2100 are capable of controlling the studied system. Insuch embodiments, each of the processors 2150 may be caused by executionof the control routine 2140 to vary one or more factors of the studiedsystem in accordance with the experiment design, as indicated in theselected design profile 2135, such that the one or more processors 2150of the one or more data devices 2100 may actually perform the test(s) ofthe experiment design.

FIG. 15 depicts aspects of an example of the provision of the GUI 3100to guide the generation of an experiment design and associated model forlater comparison. More specifically, FIG. 15 depicts aspects of theexecution of the generation routine 2510 by the processor 2550 of thecoordinating device 2500 to provide the GUI 3100. As depicted, thegeneration routine 2510 may include a model generation component 2511and/or an experiment generation component 2512. As also depicted, theGUI 3100 may be provided either locally via the display 2580 and theinput device 2520 of the coordinating device 2500, or remotely throughthe network 2999 and via the display 2780 and the input device 2720 ofthe viewing device 2700.

In executing the generation routine 2510, the processor 2550 may becaused by its execution of the model generation component 2511 tovisually present one or more portions of the GUI 3100 to guide anoperator through the provision of various parameters that define a modelof a studied system. By way or example, such portions of the GUI 3100may include various menus, staged pop-up messages, a page-by-page“wizard” or other visual technique to prompt an operator to provideindications of such details of a new model as, and not limited to, themodel type of the model (e.g., linear or non-linear), the factors and/orresponses of the model, the factor type of each factor (e.g., continuousor categorical), the terms formed from the factors, the coefficients ofthe terms, the order of each factor (e.g., first order, second order,third order, etc.), and/or identifiers for the factors, terms and/orresponses.

Also in executing the generation routine 2510, the processor 2550 may becaused by its execution of the experiment generation component 2512 tovisually present one or more other portions of the GUI 3100 to guide anoperator through the provision of various parameters that define anexperiment design associated with the model, and for use in testing thestudied system. By way or example, such other portions of the GUI 3100may prompt the operator to provide indications of such details of an newassociated experiment design as, and not limited to, the experimentdesign generation method used (e.g., orthogonal array, Placket-Burmandesign, definitive screening design, etc.), the quantity of runs to beperformed, testing values for the factors, etc.

Following or during the provision of such parameters, the processor 2550may be caused to store indications of such parameters and/or otherinformation defining the model and associated experiment design as oneof the design profiles 2531 (e.g., as the depicted example designprofile 2531 a) within the design profile data 2530. Despite thisdescription of the provision and use of the GUI 3100 to generate a newcombination of experiment design and associated model that becomes partof those included in the design profile data 2530, embodiments arepossible in which the design profile data 2530 may be provided withmultiple combinations of experiment designs and associated models fromwhich one may be selected and used to perform tests such that thegeneration of a new experiment design and associated model may not benecessary.

As previously discussed, the parameters so provided may be at leastpartially based on one or more constraints desired to be imposed onwhatever testing that may be performed on the studied system. By way ofexample, there may be budgetary, material supply and/or time constraintsthat limit the quantity of runs of any test that may be performed. Aswill shortly be explained, such generation of a new experiment designand associated model may be undertaken in order to have available anexperiment design that embodies such constraints, and thus, can be usedas a reference to which other experiment designs may be compared todetermine whether exceeding one or more of such constraints may bejustified by the benefits that may be realized.

FIG. 16 depicts aspects of an example of the provision of the GUI 3400to guide the comparison of two or more experiment designs. Morespecifically, FIG. 16 depicts aspects of the execution of the designroutine 2540 by the processor 2550 of the coordinating device 2500 toprovide the GUI 3400. As depicted, the design routine 2540 may include aselection component 2541, a matching component 2542, a statistical powercomponent 2543, a prediction variance component 2544, a fraction ofdesign space component 2545, a statistical correlation component 2546and/or an interactive evaluation component 2549. As also depicted, andsimilar to the earlier discussed provision of the GUI 3100, the GUI 3400may be provided either locally via the display 2580 and the input device2520 of the coordinating device 2500, or remotely through the network2999 and via the display 2780 and the input device 2720 of the viewingdevice 2700.

In executing the design routine 2540, the processor 2550 may be causedto execute the interactive evaluation component 2549 to recurringlyderive numerical values and/or other information as part of providingcomparisons between corresponding aspects of each one of multipleexperiment designs that are selected for comparison. Also, the processor2550 may be caused to do so as those experiment designs are selectedand/or as various parameters of each of those compared experimentdesigns are provided. Thus, the processor 2550 may be caused to executethe interactive evaluation component 2549 at least partially in parallelwith one or more of the other components 2541-2546.

FIG. 17A depicts aspects of the provision of the GUI portion 3410 toguide the selection of the multiple compared designs in greater detail.In executing the selection component 2541, the processor 2550 may becaused to present a selection list 3412 or other similar visual elementin the GUI portion 3410 by which an operator may be guided throughselecting two or more experiment designs to be compared. As depicted,definitions for each of such experiment designs may be stored asseparate design profiles 2531 (e.g., the specifically depicted exampledesign profiles 2531 a-c) within the design profile data 2530, therebyenabling definitions of the experiment designs that are selected forcomparison to be retrieved by retrieving corresponding ones of thedesign profiles 2531. In some embodiments, the selection list 3412 maypresent each of the available experiment designs with a text identifiergiven to each one, which as depicted, may be descriptive of theexperiment design generation method used in each.

As also depicted, the selection list 3412 may include a textual elementthat indicates which one of the multiple experiment designs that areselected for comparison is designated as a reference. In embodiments inwhich one of the compared designs is so designated as a reference, oneor more of the comparisons of corresponding aspects the compared designsmay be organized in a manner in which the comparisons are of thereference to all of the other experiment designs that are selected forcomparison.

Also in executing the selection component 2541, the processor 2550 maybe caused to present side-by-side selection lists 3414 or other similarvisual elements in the GUI portion 3410 by which an operator may beguided through selecting terms of the models associated with thecompared experiment designs to be included in the comparisons. Asdepicted, the side-by-side lists 3414 may include a list of terms notyet selected for inclusion in the comparisons, but available forselection, visually presented adjacent to another list of terms that arealready in the set of terms selected for inclusion in the comparisons.

Further in executing the selection component 2541, the processor 2550may be caused to monitor for the receipt of selections of experimentdesigns for comparison and/or terms to be included in the comparisonsmade via an input device (e.g., one of the input devices 2520 or 2570).In some embodiments, a cursor, crosshairs or other visual element (notshown) may be presented to provide a visual indication of the currentfocal point of a corresponding pointing device (e.g., a mouse, trackpad,joystick, etc.) that may be used by an operator to make such selectionsin a manner that will be familiar to those skilled in the art.Alternatively or additionally, a text input device (e.g., a keyboard,predictive text keypad, etc.) may be used by an operator to make suchselections through entry of text identifiers associated with experimentdesigns and/or terms. Regardless of the exact mechanism by which anoperator provides input indicating selections of experiment designs forcomparison, the processor 2550 may be caused to respond to such input byretrieving corresponding ones of the design profile 2531 from thestorage 2560. The processor 2550 may also be caused to respond to inputindicating selections of terms for inclusion in the comparisons byretrieving parameters corresponding to those selected terms from theretrieved ones of the design profiles 2531 (e.g., parameters definingthe one or more factors from which each term is formed, etc.).

In executing the interactive evaluation component 2549 at leastpartially in parallel with the selection component 2541, the processor2550 may be caused to respond to each selection of an experiment designto be compared and each selection of a term to be added to the set ofterms to be included in the comparison by recurringly performing ananalysis of the set of terms with each of the experiment designsselected for comparison. In so doing, the processor 2550 may be causedto recurringly determine whether the set of terms is unsupportable withany of the experiment designs that have been selected for comparison. Ifso, then the processor 2550 may be caused to present a notice 3416 thatthe current set of terms selected for inclusion in the comparisons isnot able to be supported by one or more of the experiment designs. Morespecifically, and where such an unsupportable situation is created bythe addition of a particular term to the set, the processor 2550 may becaused to present an embodiment of the notice 3416 that indicates thatthe term most recently selected for inclusion in the set of terms causesthe set of terms to be “inestimable” with one or more of the experimentdesigns selected for comparison. In some embodiments, the processor 2550may be caused to await the receipt of input from the operator indicatingacknowledgement of the notice 3416, and may respond to such input byremoving the most recently selected term from the set. In so doing, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to modify the presentation of the selectionlists 3414 to place the just removed term from the list indicating theset of selected terms and into the list of terms that are available forselection, but not yet selected.

FIG. 17B depicts aspects of the provision of the GUI portion 3420 toguide the generation of matches between terms of the models associatedwith the multiple compared designs in greater detail. In executing thematching component 2542, the processor 2550 may be caused to analyzevarious characteristics of the factors, terms and/or responses of eachmodel associated with one of the compared experiment designs to identifymatches therebetween. Indications of such characteristics may beretrieved by the processor from the design profiles 2531 that areassociated with the compared experiment designs. The processor 2550 mayalso retrieve a set of rules to be followed by the processor 2550 inperforming such an analysis and matching from the rules data 2535.

In following such retrieved rules in executing the matching component2542, the processor 2550 may initially attempt to match factors by thefactor type of each factor of each model. By way of example, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to at least initially identify matchesbetween factors of different models based on whether each factor is of acontinuous factor type that may have any value within a continuous rangeof numerical values, or is of a categorical factor type that may have avalue from among a set of discrete values. Following such initialmatching of factors by factor type, the processor 2550 may be caused tomatch factors of the continuous factor type (if there are any) bymatching their ranges of values, and/or may be caused to match factorsof the categorical type (if there are any) by matching their quantitiesof levels and/or the values of their levels.

Alternatively or additionally, in following such retrieved rules, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to identify matches between terms ofdifferent models based on their order (e.g., 1st order, 2nd order, 3rdorder, etc.). Also alternatively or additionally, the processor 2550 maybe caused to identify matches between factors, between terms and/orbetween responses of different models by matching the texts of theiridentifiers. By way of example, the processor 2550 may be caused tosearch and retrieve indications of matches between words based onmeaning within the vocabulary data 2533. In some embodiments, thevocabulary data 2533 may include a relatively general thesaurus and/or afield-specific thesaurus (e.g., industry-specific thesaurus,culture-specific thesaurus, technology-specific thesaurus,region-specific thesaurus) that may be deemed to be applicable.

As depicted, upon identifying one or more matches among factors, termsand/or responses, the processor 2550 may be caused by execution of thematching component 2542 to present a listing 3422 or other similarvisual element of the identified matches. The processor 2550 may befurther caused to monitor for the receipt of input from the operatorthat indicates that one or more of the matches identified by theprocessor 2550 is incorrect and/or input from the operator specifyingone or more additional matches not successfully made by the processor2550. In response to such corrective input, the processor 2550 may storeindications of matches specified by the operator as learned matchesand/or may store indications of incorrect matches made by the processor2550 within the vocabulary data 2533.

FIG. 17C depicts aspects of the provision of the GUI portion 3430 toguide the generation and consideration of a set of graphs comparingstatistical power for terms among the multiple compared designs ingreater detail. In executing the statistical power component 2543, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to analyze the terms that have beenselected for inclusion in the comparisons among the compared experimentdesigns, based on a selected signal-to-noise ratio, and may thengenerate and present a set of comparative graphs based on the analyses.In so doing, the processor 2550 may also retrieve a set of rules to befollowed by the processor 2550 in performing such analyses and/or ingenerating the comparative graphs from the rules data 2535.

In following such retrieved rules in executing the statistical powercomponent 2543, the processor 2550 may employ a predeterminedstatistical power calculation and/or an initial value forsignal-to-noise ratio by default to derive the statistical power of eachterm of the set of terms selected for inclusion in the comparisons foreach of the compared experiment designs. The processor 2550 may then becaused to generate, for each term of the set of terms, a graph of a setof graphs 3434 of statistical power vs. experiment design. Within eachgraph of the set of graphs 3434, the statistical power of a term may beplotted as a separate point for each experiment design. In so doing, theprocessor 2550 may retrieve and employ a template from the rules data2535 for generating each graph and/or may employ curve-fitting rules forfitting a curve to the plotted points within each graph.

In some embodiments, the rule data 2535 may include a rule that limitsthe performance of such analyses and the generation of the set of graphs3434 to situations in which the compared experiment designs differ onlyin the quantity of runs. Thus, in such situations, the resulting graphsprovide a depiction of statistical power vs. quantity of runs for eachterm. Such an embodiment of the set of graphs 3434 may be so generatedand then presented by the processor 2550 as part of guiding theselection of one of the compared experiment designs by providing agraphical comparison of the relative degree of benefit that may berealized for each higher quantity of runs. Where the experiment designselected as the reference is based on constraints of cost, time and/oravailability of materials, and is therefore the experiment design withthe lowest quantity of runs, such a visual presentation of fitted curvesdepicting what is often diminishing returns in statistical power witheach increase in the quantity of runs may enable the operator to morequickly identify what may be deemed to be an acceptable tradeoff inincurring an increase in cost, time and/or consumption of availablematerials to perform a particular quantity of runs that may be greaterthan the quantity associated with the reference.

As depicted, the processor 2550 may be caused to arrange the set ofgraphs 3434 adjacent to each other in a horizontally extending manner(i.e., side-by-side in a “landscape” orientation). Such an arrangementof the set of graphs may be deemed desirable to advantageously exploitthe “landscape” orientation of the binocular vision of the HVS. As willbe familiar to those skilled in the art, it is currently believed thatthe manner in which the HVS functions to both identify what is in theFOV and perceive stereoscopic depth includes the covering of the FOV ofeach eye in a two-dimensional array of multiple types of featuredetector in which each type of feature detector is implemented with aneuron that is sensitive to the presence of a particular feature withina particular portion of the FOV, such as a simple shape (e.g., a line,curve or corner) formed by one or more transitions between adjacentcolors and/or transitions between light and dark. It is also believedthat there are multiple layers of such coverage of the FOV of each eyein which a form of averaging is employed to reduce the resolution of theimages captured by each eye for each successive layer to allow featuredetectors in each of the successive layers to detect features acrossincreasingly larger portions of the FOV of each eye. It is furtherbelieved that the perception of stereoscopic vision is based oncomparisons between what is detected by the feature detectors at eachlevel between the FOVs of the left and right eyes to identify bothsimilarities and differences therebetween.

Efforts to apply such current theories of how the HVS functions todeveloping binocular image processing systems to identify objects andperceive depths in machines have met with a considerable degree ofsuccess, thereby increasing confidence in the correctness of suchtheories. Thus, the fitted curve within each of the graphs mayadvantageously provide a small set of simple shapes that form each ofthe curves that may be readily detected by a relatively small quantityof adjacent feature detectors within the FOV of each eye. Also, thehorizontal or “landscape” orientation of the adjacent placement of thegraphs in the set of graphs 3434 may advantageously exploit theleft-versus-right feature-to-feature comparison at multiple levelswithin the HVS to enable speedier recognition of similarities in thefitted curves between adjacent ones of the graphs, thereby enabling aspeedier identification of an acceptable tradeoff between quantity ofruns to perform and the relative degree of increase in statistical powerthat may be realized, given the likely diminishing returns of eachfurther increase in the quantity of runs.

As also depicted, the processor 2550 may be caused to present a visualindicator 3432 of the signal-to-noise ratio on which the calculationsthat derived the statistical power values within the set of graphs 3434are based. In executing the interactive evaluation component 2549 atleast partially in parallel with the statistical power component 2543,the processor 2550 may be caused to await receipt of an indication ofinput received from an operator that is indicative of a change to thedisplayed signal-to-noise ratio. The processor 2550 may be caused torespond to each such change by recurringly repeating the calculationsthat derived the statistical power values within the set of graphs 3434,and recurringly regenerating and re-presenting all of the graphs withinthe set of graphs 3434 to all reflect the same change in thesignal-to-noise ratio. In this way, the operator may be interactivelyprovided with answers to “what-if” questions of what would be thevarious values of statistical power for different signal-to-noise ratiosthat may be expected and/or known to be applicable to the studiedsystem.

FIG. 17D depicts aspects of the provision of the GUI portion 3440 toguide the generation and consideration of a set of graphs comparing theprediction variance for terms among the multiple compared designs ingreater detail. In executing the prediction variance component 2544, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to analyze the terms that have beenselected for inclusion in the comparisons among the compared experimentdesigns, and may then generate and present a set of comparative graphsbased on the analyses. In so doing, the processor 2550 may also retrievea set of rules to be followed by the processor 2550 in performing suchanalyses and/or in generating the comparative graphs from the rules data2535.

In following such retrieved rules in executing the prediction variancecomponent 2544, the processor 2550 may employ a predetermined predictionvariance calculation to derive the prediction variance of each term ofthe set of terms selected for inclusion in the comparisons for each ofthe compared experiment designs. The processor 2550 may then be causedto generate, for each term of the set of terms and for each of thecompared experiment designs, a graph of a set of graphs 3442 ofprediction variance. Within each graph of the set of graphs 3442, avertical line may be included that may be positioned at a defaultlocation at a zero value along the horizontal axis within a singledesign space that is identical across all of the graphs. In someembodiments, such a default location of the vertical line across all ofthe graphs may be specified as part of a template for generating thegraphs that may be retrieved by the processor 2550 from the rules data2535.

In executing the interactive evaluation component 2549 at leastpartially in parallel with the prediction variance component 2544, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to await receipt of an indication of inputreceived from an operator that is indicative of a change to thedisplayed position of the vertical line along the horizontal axis in oneof the graphs of the set of graphs 3442. The processor 2550 may becaused to respond to each such change by recurringly repeating thecalculations that derived the prediction variances for each term foreach compared design experiment, and recurringly regenerating andre-presenting all of the graphs within the set of graphs 3442 to allreflect the same change in the position of the vertical line along thehorizontal axis, and the same type of change in all of the resultingdepicted curves for prediction variance across the design space.

FIG. 17E depicts aspects of the provision of the GUI portion 3450 toguide the generation and consideration of a combined graph comparing thefraction of design space of each of the compared designs in greaterdetail. In executing the fraction of design space component 2545, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to analyze each of the compared experimentdesigns to generate, and then present, a combined graph 3452 of thefraction of design space for all of the compared experiment designs. Inso doing, the processor 2550 may also retrieve a set of rules to befollowed by the processor 2550 in performing such analyses and/or ingenerating the combined graph 3452 from the rules data 2535, including atemplate.

FIG. 17F depicts aspects of the provision of the GUI portion 3460 toguide the generation and consideration of a set of graphs comparing thedegree of correlation between terms within each of the compared designsin greater detail. In executing the statistical correlations component2546, the processor 2550 may be caused to analyze, within each of thecompared designs, the terms that have been selected for inclusion in thecomparisons to derive degrees of correlation between each possible pairof terms. The processor 2550 may then, for each of the compared designs,generate a correlation graph with all of the terms arranged in the sameorder along each of the horizontal and vertical axes, and with visualindications at each intersection visually depicting the derived degreeof correlation between the terms of the corresponding pair. Theprocessor may then also be caused to visually present the correlationgraph so generated for each of the compared experiments adjacent to eachother in a set of correlation graphs 3464. Along with the set ofcorrelation graphs 3464, the processor 2550 may additionally be causedto present a scale of the visual indications of the degree ofcorrelation used in the correlation graphs. In so doing, the processor2550 may also retrieve a set of rules to be followed by the processor2550 in performing such analyses and/or in generating the correlationgraphs from the rules data 2535, including a correlation graph template.

Again, as depicted, the processor 2550 may be caused to arrange thecorrelation graphs of the set of correlation graphs 3464 adjacent toeach other in a horizontally extending manner (i.e., side-by-side in a“landscape” orientation). As discussed earlier, such a horizontallyextending adjacent arrangement of the set of correlation graphs 3464 mayagain be deemed desirable to advantageously exploit the “landscape”orientation of the binocular vision of the HVS, including thestereoscopic comparisons believed to be routinely performed by the HVSat each level of feature detectors between the FOVs of the left andright eyes to identify both similarities and differences therebetween.Stated differently, such a horizontal side-by-side arrangement of suchcorrelation graphs that use such visual indicators of degrees ofcorrelation allow an operator to quickly identify, almost within asingle glance, both degrees of similarity and degrees of difference inthe visually indicated degrees of correlation among terms within each ofthe compared experiment designs.

In some embodiments, the processor 2550 may additionally be caused topresent a GUI portion (not shown) that allows for the selection of thescale of visual indicators of degrees of correlation from among multipledifferent scales of such visual indicators. In some embodiments,different ones of such scales may each include a different form of colorcoding. Each different form of color coding may include a range ofprogressively changing proportioned mixtures between two differentcolors that may, as entirely separate colors, each define one of theminimum and maximum degrees of correlation at the opposite ends of thescale. By way of example, such a scale may include the separate colorsred and blue marking the minimum and maximum degrees of correlation, anda progressively changing series of mixtures of different proportions ofred and blue forming various different purple colors marking variousdegrees of correlation between the minimum and maximum degrees ofcorrelation. Alternatively or additionally, different ones of suchscales may include different ranges of gray shading of a single color.Also alternatively or additionally, and as specifically depicted,different ones of such scales may include a series of different fillingpatterns that each provide a different degree of fill of a single color,thereby defining a scale that transitions from no filling to fullyfilled.

As will be familiar to those skilled in the art, in an experimentdesign, a high degree of correlation between terms can result in themasking of the influence of a particular factor in controlling one ormore responses such that the importance of the particular factor may beoverlooked. Alternatively, such a high degree of correlation betweenterms can cause a misleading inflation of the influence of a particularfactor in controlling one or more responses such that valuable time andresources may be wasted in focusing on understanding the particularfactor's influence and/or attempting to manipulate the particular factorto control one or more responses. Thus, an experiment design thatincludes one or more pairs of relatively highly correlated terms may notonly provide little or no insight into an important linkage that mayexist between factors and responses, but may also provide a misleadingimpression of there being an important linkage between factors andresponses that may not actually exist and/or that may not actually be soimportant.

The terms may be arranged in the same order along each of the horizontaland vertical axes specifically to cause the diagonal symmetry that canbe seen in FIG. 17F in the display of visual indicators of degrees ofcorrelation. One of the results of this diagonal symmetry is theformation of a visually distinct diagonal line of intersections in eachgraph at which each term is paired with itself, and thus, where it wouldbe expected that there would be complete symmetry. As depicted, each ofthese intersections along this diagonal line may be marked with anvisual indicator that indicates such maximum correlation. Doing so maybe deemed desirable to create a simple, easily identified visualreference of the location of each individual correlation graph inrelation to the others of the set of correlation graphs 3464 in whichthe ends of the diagonal line so created denote diagonally oppositecorners that quickly define the horizontal and vertical boundaries ofeach individual correlation graph.

As also depicted, the terms may be arranged along each of the horizontaland vertical axes such that lower order terms are arranged towards oneend of the diagonal line and higher order terms are arranged towards theother end of the diagonal line. As will be familiar to those skilled inthe art, the fact that many higher order terms are formed by thecombining of two or more factors increases the likelihood that higherdegrees of correlation will be encountered between higher order termsthan between lower order terms. Thus, as depicted, this may produce aregion of indications of relatively high degrees of correlation in thecorner of one or more of the correlation graphs where the intersectionscorrespond to pairs of higher order terms.

As will be familiar to those skilled in the art, relatively high degreesof correlation between lower order terms that are formed from singlefactors may be an indication that an experiment design is susceptible tomasking and/or misrepresenting the degree of influence that one or moreparticular factors may have on particular responses, especially if itproves to be the case that a particularly important factor is subject tosuch high correlation. In contrast, where there is minimal correlationbetween lower order terms, there is far less risk of not detecting theinfluence of an important factor or of a factor being given an outsizedapparent degree of influence in an experiment design, even if there arehigher degrees of correlation between higher order terms.

By arranging the terms along the horizontal and vertical axes based onthe order of the terms such that pairs of lower order terms arepositioned toward one end of the diagonal line while pairs of higherorder terms are positioned toward the other end, the ability is providedto more quickly visually distinguish experiment designs that are morelikely to be successful in illuminating linkages between factors andresponses from experiment designs that may not be. This also tends toadvantageously exploit the aforedescribed multilayer left-right featurecomparisons made by the HVS, since regions of clustered visualindications of high degrees of correlations that appear in one cornercorresponding to pairs of lower order terms or in the other cornercorresponding to pairs of higher order terms become features that aredetected by the feature detectors of the HVS. Such features then feedinto left-right comparisons at layers where the feature detectors eachcover a larger portion of the FOV of each eye such that there is anability to relatively speedily detect the difference between acorrelation graph that shows such a region in one corner (and towardsone of the left or right sides) and another correlation graph that showssuch a region in the opposite corner (and towards the other of the leftor right sides).

As depicted, the entirety of the rectangular area defined by each of thecorrelation graphs may be entirely filled in with visual indicators ofdegrees of correlation such that, except for the pairings of each termto itself along the diagonal line, the presentation of visual indicatorsof degree of correlation for all possible pairs of terms is actuallyrepeated in a manner that is diagonally mirrored on opposite sides ofthe diagonal line. Alternate embodiments are possible in which suchmirrored repetition is avoided by presenting only one set of such visualindicators in a manner that fills a triangular-shaped portion of therectangular area of each graph on only one side of the diagonal line.However, it may be deemed desirable to provide such mirrored repetitionin the presentation of the visual indicators, since doing so provides agreater volume of such indications, and in a manner that still generallyadvantageously exploits the innate multilayer left-right featurecomparisons of the HVS.

In executing the interactive evaluation component 2549 at leastpartially in parallel with the statistical correlations component 2546,the processor 2550 may be caused to await receipt of an indication ofinput received from an operator that is indicative of a change to theset of terms selected to be included in the comparisons of the comparedexperiment designs. The processor 2550 may be caused to respond to eachsuch change by recurringly repeating the analyses that derivecorrelations between terms and/or recurringly repeating the generationand presentation of the set of correlation graphs 3464 to reflect eachchanged set of terms.

FIG. 18 depicts aspects of an example of the provision of the GUI 3700to guide the performance of a regression analysis with a selectedexperiment design (e.g., an experiment design selected from among thosecompared through use of the GUI 3400). More specifically, FIG. 18depicts aspects of the execution of the regression routine 2570 by theprocessor 2550 of the coordinating device 2500 to provide the GUI 3700.FIG. 18 also depicts aspects of the execution of the regression routine2370 by at least one processor 2350 of the coordinating device 2500 orof the multiple node devices 2300 to perform the regression analysis,including the generation of simulated data. As depicted, the regressionroutine 2570 may include a simulation component 2571, an equationcomponent 2572 and/or a split-plot component 2573. As also depicted, andsimilar to the earlier discussed provision of the GUIs 3100 and 3400,the GUI 3700 may be provided either locally via the display 2580 and theinput device 2520 of the coordinating device 2500, or remotely throughthe network 2999 and via the display 2780 and the input device 2720 ofthe viewing device 2700.

In executing the regression routine 2570, the processor 2550 may becaused to execute the interactive analysis component 2579 to recurringlyderive numerical values and/or generating executable instructions aspart of guiding an operator through preparations for and/or performanceof the regression analysis with a selected experiment design. Also, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to do so as various parameters for theperformance of the regression analysis are provided. Thus, the processor2550 may be caused to execute the interactive analysis component 2579 atleast partially in parallel with one or more of the other components2571-2573.

FIG. 19A depicts aspects of the provision of the GUI portion 3710 toguide the provision of various parameters for the performance of theregression analysis with a selected experiment design in greater detail.Where the experiment design on which the regression analysis to beperformed is an experiment design that was selected from among theearlier discussed compared experiment designs, the guiding of anoperator via the GUI 3400 to select one of the compared experimentdesigns for regression analysis may have resulted in the processor 2550being caused to store various parameters that define the selectedexperiment design as the selected design profile 2135. Alternatively oradditionally, the processor 2550 may be caused by execution of theregression routine 2570 to provide an opportunity within the GUI 3700for the operator to select the experiment design with which regressionis to be performed in lieu of or in addition to such an opportunitybeing provided within the GUI 3400.

In executing the simulation component 2571, the processor 2550 may becaused to present a set of entry boxes 3712 or other similar visualelements in the GUI portion 3710 in which default coefficients of themodel associated with the selected experiment design may be visuallypresented, and/or by which an operator may provide alternatecoefficients. In some embodiments, the default coefficients may beretrieved by the processor 2550 from the selected design profile 2135,which may have been copied from one of the design profiles 2531 as aresult of one of the compared experiment designs having been selected tobe the experiment design with which the regression analysis is to beperformed. Thus, the default coefficients may have been introducedduring the comparison of the compared experiment designs, where the samecoefficients may have been used across all of the compared experimentdesigns. However, as has been discussed, the default coefficients mayhave been provided through the use of the GUI 3100 to enter a definitionof the experiment design and its associated model, including thecoefficients.

Also in executing the simulation component 2571, the processor 2550 maybe caused to present prompts for the provision of various parameters forthe generation of simulated data. More specifically, the processor 2550may be caused to present “radio buttons” 3714 or another type ofselectable visual element in the GUI portion 3710 by which one of a listof types of distribution for the generation of the simulated data may beselected. Alternatively or additionally, the processor 2550 may becaused to present one or more entry boxes 3716 or other similar visualelements in the GUI portion 3710 in which default parameters for degreeof error may be visually presented, and/or by which an operator mayprovide alternate parameters for degree of error. As depicted, a singleentry box may be presented in which a single error parameter may bespecified that may be applicable to all factors, or one or moreadditional entry boxes may also be presented in which one or moreseparate additional error parameters may be specified for one or morefactors that are indicated as difficult to vary in a split-plot orsplit-split-plot experiment design.

FIG. 19B depicts aspects of the provision of the GUI portion 3720 toguide the generation and consideration of executable instructions that,when executed, control the performance of the regression analysis,including the manner in which simulated data used in the regressionanalysis is to be generated. In executing the equation component 2572,the processor 2550 may be caused to first generate executableinstructions 2136 that may be executed by one or more processors (e.g.,the processor 2550 or the one or more processors 2350) to perform theregression analysis with the selected experiment design defined in theselected design profile 2135. In generating the executable instructions2136, the processor 2550 may be caused to retrieve one or more rulesfrom the rules data 2535 that may include syntax rules to be followed ingenerating the executable instructions 2136, and such rules may beassociated with and/or explicitly specify a pre-selected programminglanguage. Alternatively or additionally, the processor 2550 may becaused to retrieve one or more pre-selected algorithms and/or portionsof executable instructions that implement one or more pre-selectedalgorithms for the random generation of simulated data, including doingso in a manner that results in the simulated data having the type ofdistribution selected via the previously discussed GUI portion 3710.Also, In generating the executable instructions 2136, the processor 2550may be caused to incorporate various parameters that may be provided tocontrol the performance of the regression analysis, including and notlimited to, the terms of the associated model that have been selectedfor inclusion in the experiment design, various characteristics of thefactors from which the terms are formed, the coefficients for the termsand any intercept value, various characteristics of the responses, thequantity of runs, input values to be given to the factors, and/or aquantity of iterations to be performed of the regression analysis(including iterations of generating simulated data). Following thegeneration of the executable instructions 2136, the processor 2550 maybe caused to store the executable instructions 2136 as part of theselected design profile 2135.

Also in executing the equation component 2572, the processor 2550 may becaused to generate a human readable expression 3722 of a portion of theexecutable instructions 2136 that includes, and is not limited toincluding, the terms and/or coefficients of the associated model inmathematical notation, and/or an identifier of the selected type ofdistribution 3728 for the simulated data and/or of the quantity ofiterations 3727 of the regression analysis to be performed. Theprocessor 2550 may then be caused to present the human readableexpression 3722. In generating the executable instructions 2136, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to retrieve one or more rules from therules data 2535 for generating the human readable expression 3722, suchas ordering of various elements, and/or mathematical notation syntaxrules concerning delimiters that may be used to separate and organizethe various elements. By way of example, in employing mathematicalnotation syntax rules, the processor 2550 may be caused to separatevarious elements with pairs of brackets 3724 and/or one or more of avinculum 3725 (e.g., to separate a numerator from a denominator inexpressing a division operation).

In executing the interactive analysis component 2579 at least partiallyin parallel with the equation component 2742, the processor 2550 may becaused to respond to each provision and/or change in a parameter forperforming the regression analysis by recurringly regenerating theexecutable instructions 2136, and/or by recurringly regenerating and/orre-presenting the human readable expression 3722 of a portion of theexecutable instructions 2136. The parameters that, upon being providedand/or changed through use of the GUI portion 3710 and/or other GUIportions, may trigger such recurring operations by the processor 2550may include, and are not limited to, the coefficients, the interceptvalue, the type of distribution, degree(s) of error and/or the quantityof iterations of the regression to be performed.

FIGS. 19C and 19D, together, depict aspects of the provision of the GUIportion 3730 to guide the provision of parameters and generation ofportions of the executable instructions 2136 associated with theselected experiment design becoming a split-plot or split-split-plotdesign.

Turning more specifically to FIG. 19C, in executing the split-plotcomponent 2573, the processor 2550 may be caused to present a set ofentry boxes 3732 or other similar visual elements in the GUI portion3730 in which a single default degree of difficulty in varying allfactors may be visually presented, but by which an operator may provideone or more alternate indications of degree of difficulty in varying oneor more of the factors. Also in executing the split-plot component 2573,the processor 2550 may be caused to present one or more other entryboxes 3734 or other similar visual elements in the GUI portion 3730 inwhich, at least initially, a default parameter for quantity of runs maybe visually presented. However, in response to the entry of one or moredegrees of difficulty in varying a factor are entered into one or moreof the entry boxes 3732, the processor 2550 may be caused to augment thesingle entry box 3734 for quantity of runs with one or more additionalentry boxes 3734 for quantity of plots and/or subplots, depending onwhether the selected experiment design is caused to become a split-plotexperiment design or split-split-plot experiment design.

In executing the interactive analysis component 2579 at least partiallyin parallel with the split-plot component 2743, the processor 2550 maybe caused to respond to each provision and/or change in a parameterindicative of a split-plot experiment design or split-split-plotexperiment design by recurringly regenerating and re-presenting one ormore of the GUI portions 3710, 3720 and 3730 to prompt the operator toprovide further parameters. By way of example, the processor 2550 may becaused to regenerate and re-present the GUI portion 3710 with the one ormore entry boxes 3716 additionally including an entry box in which adefault degree of error for whole plots in at least a split-plotexperiment design, and enabling provision of a different degree of errorfor whole plots by the operator. Also by way of example, the processor2550 may be caused to augment the GUI portion 3730 to additionallyinclude a table depicting an order in which factors may be varied duringthe performance of the experiment design to minimize the instances inwhich one or more particular factors may be varied, such as the table3736 depicted in FIG. 19D.

Alternatively or additionally, in executing the interactive analysiscomponent 2579 at least partially in parallel with the split-plotcomponent 2743, the processor 2550 may be caused to respond to eachprovision and/or change in a parameter indicative of a split-plotexperiment design or split-split-plot experiment design by recurringlyregenerating the executable instructions 2136 to accommodate separatedegrees of error for each factor indicated as more difficult to varyand/or to accommodate associated changes in the manner in whichsimulated data is to be generated. Correspondingly, the processor 2550may be caused to recurringly regenerate and/or re-present the humanreadable expression 3722 of a portion of the executable instructions2136.

FIG. 19E depicts an example of an alternate human readable expression3722 that reflects a change of the selected experiment design to asplit-split-plot design. As depicted, multiple pairs of brackets 3724are used to provide clear visual separation of a portion of theexecutable instructions that minimizes the varying of one factor inwhole plots, from another portion that minimizes the varying of anotherfactor in subplots, and from still other portions that implement fullyrandom varying of the remaining factors. Also again, there are explicitidentifiers of the type of distribution 3728 selected for the simulateddata.

Following completion of the provision of parameters for the performanceof the regression analysis with the selected experiment design, andfollowing the generation of the executable instructions 2136 therefrom,the processor 2550 may be caused by further execution of the regressionroutine 2570 to distribute the executable instructions 2136 to the oneor more processors 2350 to cause performance of the regression analysis.Again, in some embodiments, the executable instructions 2136 may beincorporated into or be other accompanied by the selected design profile2135 such that the selected design profile 2135 may be distributed tothe one or more processors 2350. In some embodiments, and in addition tothe distribution of the executable instructions 2136, the processor 2550may be further caused to at least coordinate the distribution of one ormore of the data set portions 2131 thereamong. Also again, in variousembodiments, the one or more processors 2350 may be incorporated intothe multiple node devices 2300 or within the coordinating device. Thus,in differing embodiments, the executable instructions 2136 and/or theone or more data set portions 2131 may be distributed among multiplenode devices 2300, or among storage locations within storage 2360 foraccess by the one or more processors 2350 within the coordinating device2500.

Regardless of the physical location(s) of the one or more processors2350, in executing the regression routine 2370, each of the one or moreprocessors 2350, and/or each of the processing cores 2355 of each of theone or more processors 2350, may be caused to execute the executableinstructions 2136 distributed thereto, and in so doing, perform at leastone iteration of the regression analysis with the selected experimentdesign. The processor 2550 may be caused by its execution of theregression routine 2570 to coordinate the multiple, and at leastpartially parallel, performances of the regression analysis. As part ofeach iteration of each such performance, and as per the executableinstructions 2136, simulated data is randomly generated in a manner thatmeets the specified distribution.

From the iterations of the regression analysis, the results data 2730may be generated to provide an indication of the results of theregression analysis. As previously discussed, the results data 2730 maybe presented by the processor 2550 (e.g., through use of the display2580 or 2780), or may be transmitted to the viewing device 2700 forpresentation to the operator via the processor 2750 thereof. Followingthe performance of the regression analysis, and in embodiments in whichthe one or more data devices 2100 control the studied system, theselected design profile 2135 may be transmitted to the one or more datadevices 2100 to enable for use thereby in performing the selectedexperiment design.

Returning to FIGS. 13A and 13B, in various embodiments, each of theprocessors 2150, 2350, 2550 and 2750 may include any of a wide varietyof commercially available processors. Further, one or more of theseprocessors may include multiple processors, a multi-threaded processor,a multi-core processor (whether the multiple cores coexist on the sameor separate dies), and/or a multi-processor architecture of some othervariety by which multiple physically separate processors are linked.

However, in a specific embodiment, the processor 2550 of thecoordinating device 2500 or the controller 2507 may be selected toefficiently perform an analysis of the multiple experiment designsand/or associated models. Alternatively or additionally, the processor2350 of each of the node devices 2300 may be selected to efficientlyperform a regression analysis while generating simulated data at leastpartially in parallel. By way of example, the processor 2350 mayincorporate a single-instruction multiple-data (SIMD) architecture, mayincorporate multiple processing pipelines, and/or may incorporate theability to support multiple simultaneous threads of execution perprocessing pipeline.

In various embodiments, each of the routines 2140, 2370, 2510, 2540,2570 and 2740, including the components of which each is composed, maybe selected to be operative on whatever type of processor or processorsthat are selected to implement applicable ones of the processors 2150,2350, 2550 and/or 2750 within corresponding ones of the devices 2100,2300, 2500 and/or 2700. In various embodiments, each of these routinesmay include one or more of an operating system, device drivers and/orapplication-level routines (e.g., so-called “software suites” providedon disc media, “applets” obtained from a remote server, etc.). Where anoperating system is included, the operating system may be any of avariety of available operating systems appropriate for the processors2150, 2350, 2550 and/or 2750. Where one or more device drivers areincluded, those device drivers may provide support for any of a varietyof other components, whether hardware or software components, of thedevices 2100, 2300, 2500 and/or 2700.

In various embodiments, each of the storages 2160, 2360, 2560 and 2760may be based on any of a wide variety of information storagetechnologies, including volatile technologies requiring theuninterrupted provision of electric power, and/or including technologiesentailing the use of machine-readable storage media that may or may notbe removable. Thus, each of these storages may include any of a widevariety of types (or combination of types) of storage device, includingwithout limitation, read-only memory (ROM), random-access memory (RAM),dynamic RAM (DRAM), Double-Data-Rate DRAM (DDR-DRAM), synchronous DRAM(SDRAM), static RAM (SRAM), programmable ROM (PROM), erasableprogrammable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM(EEPROM), flash memory, polymer memory (e.g., ferroelectric polymermemory), ovonic memory, phase change or ferroelectric memory,silicon-oxide-nitride-oxide-silicon (SONOS) memory, magnetic or opticalcards, one or more individual ferromagnetic disk drives, non-volatilestorage class memory, or a plurality of storage devices organized intoone or more arrays (e.g., multiple ferromagnetic disk drives organizedinto a Redundant Array of Independent Disks array, or RAID array). Itshould be noted that although each of these storages is depicted as asingle block, one or more of these may include multiple storage devicesthat may be based on differing storage technologies. Thus, for example,one or more of each of these depicted storages may represent acombination of an optical drive or flash memory card reader by whichprograms and/or data may be stored and conveyed on some form ofmachine-readable storage media, a ferromagnetic disk drive to storeprograms and/or data locally for a relatively extended period, and oneor more volatile solid state memory devices enabling relatively quickaccess to programs and/or data (e.g., SRAM or DRAM). It should also benoted that each of these storages may be made up of multiple storagecomponents based on identical storage technology, but which may bemaintained separately as a result of specialization in use (e.g., someDRAM devices employed as a main storage while other DRAM devicesemployed as a distinct frame buffer of a graphics controller).

However, in a specific embodiment, the storage 2360 of one or more ofthe node devices 2300 that stores one or more of the data set portions2131 may be implemented with a redundant array of independent discs(RAID) of a RAID level selected to provide fault tolerance to preventloss of one or more of these datasets and/or to provide increased speedin accessing one or more of these datasets.

In various embodiments, each of the input devices 2520 and 2720 may eachbe any of a variety of types of input device that may each employ any ofa wide variety of input detection and/or reception technologies.Examples of such input devices include, and are not limited to,microphones, remote controls, stylus pens, card readers, finger printreaders, virtual reality interaction gloves, graphical input tablets,joysticks, keyboards, retina scanners, the touch input components oftouch screens, trackballs, environmental sensors, and/or either camerasor camera arrays to monitor movement of persons to accept commandsand/or data provided by those persons via gestures and/or facialexpressions. In various embodiments, each of the displays 2580 and 2780may each be any of a variety of types of display device that may eachemploy any of a wide variety of visual presentation technologies.Examples of such a display device includes, and is not limited to, acathode-ray tube (CRT), an electroluminescent (EL) panel, a liquidcrystal display (LCD), a gas plasma display, etc. In some embodiments,the display 2580 of the coordinating device 2500 and/or the display 2780of the viewing device 2700 may be a touchscreen display such that theinput device 2520 may be incorporated into the display 2580 and/or theinput device 2720 may be incorporated into the display 2780. In suchembodiments, the input device 2520 and/or the input device 2720 may be atouch-sensitive component of the display 2580 and/or the display 2780,respectively.

In various embodiments, the network interfaces 2190, 2390, 2590 and 2790may employ any of a wide variety of communications technologies enablingthese devices to be coupled to other devices as has been described. Eachof these interfaces includes circuitry providing at least some of therequisite functionality to enable such coupling. However, each of theseinterfaces may also be at least partially implemented with sequences ofinstructions executed by corresponding ones of the processors (e.g., toimplement a protocol stack or other features). Where electrically and/oroptically conductive cabling is employed, these interfaces may employtimings and/or protocols conforming to any of a variety of industrystandards, including without limitation, RS-232C, RS-422, USB, Ethernet(IEEE-802.3) or IEEE-1394. Where the use of wireless transmissions isentailed, these interfaces may employ timings and/or protocolsconforming to any of a variety of industry standards, including withoutlimitation, IEEE 802.11a, 802.11ad, 802.11ah, 802.11ax, 802.11b,802.11g, 802.16, 802.20 (commonly referred to as “Mobile BroadbandWireless Access”); the BLUETOOTH® standard; the ZIGBEE® standard; or acellular radiotelephone service such as GSM with General Packet RadioService (GSM/GPRS), CDMA/1×RTT, Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution(EDGE), Evolution Data Only/Optimized (EV-DO), Evolution For Data andVoice (EV-DV), High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA), High SpeedUplink Packet Access (HSUPA), 4G LTE, etc.

However, in a specific embodiment, the network interface 2390 of one ormore of the node devices 2300 that stores one or more of the data setportions 2131 may be implemented with multiple copper-based orfiber-optic based network interface ports to provide redundant and/orparallel pathways in exchanging one or more of the data set portions2131 with the one or more storage devices 2100.

FIGS. 20A and 20B, together, illustrate an example embodiment of a logicflow 4100. The logic flow 4100 may be representative of some or all ofthe operations executed by one or more embodiments described herein.More specifically, the logic flow 4100 may illustrate operationsperformed by the processor 2550 and/or the one or more processors 2350,and/or performed by other component(s) of each of the coordinatingdevice 2500 and/or the multiple node devices 2300, respectively, inexecuting corresponding ones of the design routine 2540, the regressionroutine 2570 and/or the regression routine 2370 to guide selection of,and the performance of a regression analysis with, an experiment design.

At 4110, a processor of a coordinating device of a distributedprocessing system (e.g., the processor 2550 of the coordinating device2500 of the distributed processing system 2000) may receive indicationsof selections of two or more experiment designs to be compared. Aspreviously discussed, the processor 2550 may present the GUI portion3410 (see FIG. 17A) to guide an operator of the coordinating device 2500(either directly or remotely through another device, such as the viewingdevice 2700) to provide input indicating such selections.

At 4112, the processor of the coordinating device may employ variouscharacteristics of the factors, terms and/or responses of each of themodels associated with one of the compared experiment designs toidentify and present matches thereamong. At 4114, the processor mayreceive indications from the operator of corrections to one or more ofsuch automatically identified matches. If any such indications arereceived, the processor may effect such corrections by changing one ormore matches so indicated as being in error. As previously discussed, inaddition to effecting such corrections, the processor may also be causedto store indications of such corrections by storing indications oflearned matches for future use.

At 4120, the processor of the coordinating device may receiveindications of selections of terms that are to be included in the set ofterms to be used in the comparisons among the compared experimentdesigns. At 4122, the processor may be caused to present an indicationthat the set of terms is not able to be supported by one or more of thecompared experiment designs such that one or more of the terms withinthe set needs to be removed so that the set is able to be supported. At4124, where such an indication was presented by the processor, theprocessor may receive indications of an alternate selection of one ormore terms for inclusion in the set of terms for comparison. Aspreviously discussed, the processor 2550 may present the GUI portion3410 to guide the operator to provide input indicating such selections,including generating and visually presenting the notice 3416 (see FIG.17A) to the effect that the set of terms current selected is notsupportable.

At 4130, the processor of the coordinating device may receiveindications of an adjustment to the signal-to-noise ratio(s) to whichone or more of the terms may be subject. At 4132, the processor mayderive the statistical power of each term and for each of the comparedexperiment designs. The processor may then generate a graph, for eachterm, that plots the statistical power of that term across all of thecompared experiment designs. The processor may further visually presentall of the graphs (one per term) adjacent to each other in a manner thatmay form a horizontally extending row of the graphs (i.e., side-by-side)to exploit the innate left-right feature comparison capabilities of theHVS. As previously discussed, for each such graph of the set of graphs3434 of statistical power vs. experiment design in GUI portion 3400 (seeFIG. 17C), the processor 2550 may be further caused to fit a curve tothe plotted points of statistical power vs. experiment design.

At 4140, the processor of the coordinating device may derive theprediction variance of each term and for each of the compared experimentdesigns. The processor may then generate a graph, for each term and foreach experiment design, that plots the prediction variance, and presentthose graphs in adjacent to each other in multiple horizontal rows whereeach row corresponds to one of the compared experiment designs. At 4142,the processor may receive indications from the operator of a change tothe default horizontal positioning within the design space of a verticalline. At 4144, if such an indication is received, the processor mayeffect such corrections by regenerating all of the graphs to reflect thenew horizontal positioning.

At 4150, the processor of the coordinating device may derive and presenta combined graph that overlays the fraction of design space for all ofthe compared experiment designs. At 4152, the processor may derive thedegree of correlation between each possible pair of terms that may beformed from the set of terms selected for use in the comparisons of thecompared experiment designs. The processor may then generate andvisually present a correlation graph, one each per compared experimentdesign, where all of the terms are arranged in identical order alongeach of the horizontal and vertical axes, and in which visual indicatorsare positioned at each intersection within the graph that corresponds toone of the possible pairs of terms. The processor may further presentthe correlation graphs adjacent to each other and arranged horizontallyin a single row (e.g., side-by-side) to exploit the left-right featurecomparison capabilities of the HVS. As previously discussed, the visualindicators used may be selected from a scale of visual indicators thatmay form a scale of progressive transition from one color to another, aprogressive transition between light and dark on a grayscale, etc., thatmay be presented as part of the GUI portion 3460 (see FIG. 17F).

At 4160, the processor of the coordinating device may receive anindication of a selection of an experiment design that may be from amongthe multiple compared experiment designs, for regression analysis. At4161, the processor may receive an indication of a change to defaultcoefficient(s) for one or more of the terms of the model associated withthe selected experiment design. At 4163, the processor may receive anindication of a selection of a type of distribution for the randomgeneration of simulated data. At 4164, the processor may receive anindication of a quantity of iterations of the regression analysis to beperformed. As previously discussed, the processor 2550 may be caused topresent GUI portion 3710 to guide an operator through providing suchparameters (see FIG. 19A).

At 4166, the processor of the coordinating device may receive anindication of there being a higher degree of difficulty in varying oneor more particular factors than for the other factors. At 4167, theprocessor may receive an indication of the one or more particularfactors having a higher degree of difficulty in being varied also beingsubject to a different degree of error. As previously discussed, theprocessor 2550 may be caused to present GUI portion 3730 to guide anoperator through providing such parameters (see FIG. 19C). As alsopreviously discussed, following receipt of an indication of there beinga different degree of difficulty in varying one or more particularfactors, the processor 2550 may be caused to present additional promptsto additionally guide an operator through providing separate additionalparameters for whole plots and/or subplots, such as the additional entryboxes 3716 by which separate degrees of error may be provided for wholeplots and/or subplots.

At 4170, based on the parameters provided by the operator and/or fromany unchanged default parameters, the processor of the coordinatingdevice may be caused to generate a sequence of executable instructions(e.g., the executable instructions 2136) in a pre-selected programminglanguage for performing the regression analysis. At 4172, the processormay also be caused to generate and visually present a human readableform of a portion of the executable instructions that employs themathematical syntax of a formula to expresses the performance of theregression analysis (e.g., the human readable expression 3722, examplesof which are depicted in FIGS. 19B and 19E). As previously discussed,such a human readable expression may include the values of thecoefficients and/or any intercept, may specify the selected type ofdistribution to be achieved in the random generation of simulated data,and/or may specify the quantity of iterations of the regression analysisto be performed.

At 4180, the processor of the coordinating device may check whether anyindication has been received of operation of an input device to makechanges to one or more of the earlier provided parameters. If so, thenthe processor may return to receiving and/or acting on the provision ofrevised versions of various parameters at 4161 through 4167.

However, if at 4180, there are no such indications of changes toparameters, then at 4190, the processor of the coordinating device mayproceed with either directly executing the executable instructions toperform the specified quantity of iterations of the regression analysis,or may coordinate the distribution and performance of the iterations ofthe regression analysis by multiple other processors and/or processorcores (e.g., the one or more processors 2350 and/or processor cores2355). As previously discussed, such other processors and/or processorcores may be incorporated into multiple node devices with which thecoordinating device may communicate via a network (e.g., the multiplenode devices 2300 via the network 2999). Alternatively, and as alsopreviously discussed, such other processor(s) and/or processor cores maybe incorporated into the coordinating device (e.g., as one or moreGPUs).

Upon completion of the specified quantity of iterations of theregression analysis, the processor of the coordinating device mayvisually present the results thereof at 4192.

FIG. 21 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow 4200. Thelogic flow 4200 may be representative of some or all of the operationsexecuted by one or more embodiments described herein. More specifically,the logic flow 4200 may illustrate operations performed by the processor2550, and/or performed by other component(s) of the coordinating device2500 in executing the design routine 2540 to guide selection of anexperiment design.

At 4210, a processor of a coordinating device of a distributedprocessing system (e.g., the processor 2550 of the coordinating device2500 of the distributed processing system 2000) may receive indicationsof selections of two or more experiment designs to be compared. Again,as previously discussed, the processor 2550 may present the GUI portion3410 (see FIG. 17A) to guide an operator of the coordinating device 2500to provide input indicating such selections.

At 4220, the processor of the coordinating device may employ variouscharacteristics of the factors of each of the models associated with oneof the compared experiment designs to identify matches thereamong. Amongthe characteristics that the processor may be caused to use, at leastinitially, may include, and are not limited to, type of factor (e.g.,continuous or categorical), quantities of levels and/or values of thelevels for each categorical factor (if any), ranges of values (e.g., theminimum and maximum values of the range of values) for each continuousfactor (if any). Where there remain factors yet to be matched, or wherethere is otherwise remaining uncertainty in the identification ofmatches between factors, the processor may also employ the texts and/orthe meanings of the texts of the identifiers given to each factor. Ashas been discussed, the processor may employ vocabulary data that mayinclude a thesaurus (e.g., the vocabulary data 2533) in such text-basedidentification of matches.

At 4222, the processor of the coordinating device may employ variouscharacteristics of the terms of the models associated with one of thecompared experiment designs to identify matches thereamong, includingand not limited to, the order of each term (e.g., first order, secondorder, third order, etc.). Where there remain terms yet to be matched,or where there is otherwise remaining uncertainty in the identificationof matches between terms, the processor may also employ the texts and/orthe meanings of the texts of the identifiers given to each term.

At 4224, the processor of the coordinating device may employ at leastthe texts and/or the meanings of the texts of the identifiers given toeach response to identify matches thereamong.

At 4230, the processor of the coordinating device may present thematches identified by the processor among factors, terms and/orresponses. As previously discussed, the processor 2550 may present suchmatches through the presentation of the GUI portion 3420 (see FIG. 17B)as part of guiding an operator of the coordinating device 2500 (eitherdirectly or remotely through another device, such as the viewing device2700) to provide input indicating such selections. At 4232, theprocessor of the coordinating device may monitor one or more inputdevices for indications of entry of input conveying one or morecorrections to the matches identified by the processor at 4220-4224.

At 4234, if such input is received, then the processor of thecoordinating device may store an indication of the correction along withand/or as part of the thesaurus. The processor may then repeat some orall of the work of identifying matches at 4220-4224.

FIG. 22 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow 4300. Thelogic flow 4300 may be representative of some or all of the operationsexecuted by one or more embodiments described herein. More specifically,the logic flow 4300 may illustrate operations performed by the processor2550, and/or performed by other component(s) of the coordinating device2500 in executing the design routine 2540 to guide selection of anexperiment design.

At 4310, a processor of a coordinating device of a distributedprocessing system (e.g., the processor 2550 of the coordinating device2500 of the distributed processing system 2000) may receive indicationsof selections of two or more experiment designs to be compared. Again,as previously discussed, the processor 2550 may present the GUI portion3410 (see FIG. 17A) to guide an operator of the coordinating device 2500to provide input indicating such selections.

At 4320, the processor of the coordinating device may monitor one ormore input devices for indications of entry of input indicative of aselection of a term to add to the set of terms to be included in thecomparison.

At 4322, if such input is received, then at 4330, the processor of thecoordinating device may analyze each of the compared experiment designsto determine whether one or more of them are unable to support the setof terms selected for inclusion in the comparison following the additionof the just selected term to the set. If, at 4332, the resulting set ofterms is supportable by all of the compared experiment designs, then theprocessor may return to monitoring one or more input devices at 4320.

However, if at 4332, the set of terms selected for inclusion in thecomparison is not supportable by all of the compared experiment designs,then at 4340, the processor may be caused to present a notice that theset of terms is not able to be supported by one or more of the comparedexperiment designs. At 4342, the processor may receive an indication ofreception of input indicating an acknowledgement of the notice. Inresponse, the processor may remove the term most recently selected foraddition to the set at 4344, and return to monitoring one or more inputdevices at 4320.

FIG. 23 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow 4400. Thelogic flow 4400 may be representative of some or all of the operationsexecuted by one or more embodiments described herein. More specifically,the logic flow 4400 may illustrate operations performed by the processor2550, and/or performed by other component(s) of the coordinating device2500 in executing the design routine 2540 to guide selection of anexperiment design.

At 4410, a processor of a coordinating device of a distributedprocessing system (e.g., the processor 2550 of the coordinating device2500 of the distributed processing system 2000) may derive a statisticalpower for each term in a set of terms to be included in a comparison ofmultiple experiment designs, and separately for each one of the comparedexperiment designs. At 4412, the processor may then generate, for eachterm of the set of terms, a graph that plots the statistical power ofthat term across all of the compared experiment designs. At 4414, withineach of the graphs, the processor may then fit a curve to the plots ofthe corresponding term for all of the compared experiment designs. At4416, the processor may visually present all of the graphs (again, eachone corresponding to one of the terms of the set) adjacent to each otherin a manner that may form a horizontally extending row of the graphs(i.e., side-by-side) to exploit the innate left-right feature comparisoncapabilities of the HVS.

At 4420, the processor of the coordinating device may monitor one ormore input devices for indications of entry of input indicative of achange to a degree of error for a term in the set of terms. If, at 4422,such input is received, then at 4430, the processor may generate, foreach term of the set of terms, a new graph that plots the statisticalpower of that term across all of the compared experiment designs. At4432, within each of the new graphs, the processor may then fit a newcurve to the new plots of the corresponding term for all of the comparedexperiment designs.

FIG. 24 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow 4500. Thelogic flow 4500 may be representative of some or all of the operationsexecuted by one or more embodiments described herein. More specifically,the logic flow 4500 may illustrate operations performed by the processor2550, and/or performed by other component(s) of the coordinating device2500 in executing the design routine 2540 to guide selection of anexperiment design.

At 4510, a processor of a coordinating device of a distributedprocessing system (e.g., the processor 2550 of the coordinating device2500 of the distributed processing system 2000) may derive a predictionvariance for each term in a set of terms to be included in a comparisonof multiple experiment designs, and separately for each one of thecompared experiment designs. At 4512, the processor may then generate,for each term and for each experiment design, a graph of the predictionvariance throughout the range of design space, and centered at a defaultpercentile of the design space that may be marked by a vertical linepositioned along the horizontal axis. At 4514, the processor may presentthose graphs in adjacent to each other in multiple horizontal rows whereeach row corresponds to one of the compared experiment designs.

At 4520, the processor of the coordinating device may monitor one ormore input devices for indications of entry of input indicative of achange in the percentile of the design space at which the graph iscentered. As previously discussed, such an indication may be as a resultof use of a pointing device to horizontally change the position of thevertical line along the horizontal axis. If, at 4522, such input isreceived, then at 4530, the processor may generate, for each term andfor each experiment design, a new graph of the prediction variancethroughout the range of design space, and centered at a new percentileof the design space that may be marked by the vertical line at a newposition along the horizontal axis. At 4514, the processor may presentthe new graphs in adjacent to each other in multiple horizontal rowswhere each row corresponds to one of the compared experiment designs.

FIG. 25 illustrates an example embodiment of a logic flow 4600. Thelogic flow 4600 may be representative of some or all of the operationsexecuted by one or more embodiments described herein. More specifically,the logic flow 4600 may illustrate operations performed by the processor2550, and/or performed by other component(s) of the coordinating device2500 in executing the design routine 2540 to guide selection of anexperiment design.

At 4610 and 4612, a processor of a coordinating device of a distributedprocessing system (e.g., the processor 2550 of the coordinating device2500 of the distributed processing system 2000) may derive the degree ofcorrelation between each possible pair of terms that may be formed froma set of terms to be included in a comparison of multiple experimentdesigns. More specifically, in some embodiments, the processor mayderive the covariance of each possible pair of terms, and then derivethe degree of correlation for each of those pairs based on their derivedcovariance and standard deviations.

At 4614, the processor of the coordinating device may then generate acorrelation graph, one each per compared experiment design, where all ofthe terms are arranged in identical order along each of the horizontaland vertical axes, and in which visual indicators are positioned at eachintersection within the graph that corresponds to one of the possiblepairs of terms. As previously discussed, the visual indicators used maybe selected from a scale of visual indicators that may form a scale ofprogressive transition from one color to another, a progressivetransition between light and dark on a grayscale, and/or a progressivetransition through a series of patterns that transition between no filland being fully filled in. At 4616, the processor may further presentthe correlation graphs adjacent to each other and arranged horizontallyin a single row (e.g., side-by-side) to exploit the left-right featurecomparison capabilities of the HVS.

At 4620, the processor of the coordinating device may monitor one ormore input devices for indications of entry of input indicative of achange to the set of terms to either add a term thereto or remove a termtherefrom. If, at 4622, such input is received, then at 4630 and 4632,the may again derive the degree of correlation between each possiblepair of terms that may be formed from the set of terms. Again, morespecifically in some embodiments, the processor may derive thecovariance of each possible pair of terms, and then derive the degree ofcorrelation for each of those pairs based on their derived covarianceand standard deviations.

At 4634, the processor of the coordinating device may generate a newcorrelation graph, one each per compared experiment design, where all ofthe terms are arranged in identical order along each of the horizontaland vertical axes, and in which visual indicators are positioned at eachintersection within the graph that corresponds to one of the possiblepairs of terms. At 4616, the processor may then present the newcorrelation graphs adjacent to each other and arranged horizontally in asingle row (e.g., side-by-side) to exploit the left-right featurecomparison capabilities of the HVS.

FIGS. 26A and 26B, together, illustrate an example embodiment of a logicflow 4700. The logic flow 4700 may be representative of some or all ofthe operations executed by one or more embodiments described herein.More specifically, the logic flow 4700 may illustrate operationsperformed by the processor 2550 and/or the one or more processors 2350,and/or performed by other component(s) of each of the coordinatingdevice 2500 and/or the multiple node devices 2300, respectively, inexecuting corresponding ones of the regression routines 2570 and/or 2370to guide the performance of a regression analysis with, a selectedexperiment design.

At 4710, a processor of a coordinating device of a distributedprocessing system (e.g., the processor 2550 of the coordinating device2500 of the distributed processing system 2000) may receive anindication of a selection of an experiment design that may be from amongthe multiple compared experiment designs, for regression analysis.

At 4720, the processor of the coordinating device may monitor one ormore input devices for indications of entry of input indicative of achange to default coefficient(s) for one or more of the terms of themodel associated with the selected experiment design. If, at 4722, suchinput is received, then at 4724, the processor may enact such change(s)to the default coefficient(s), and may return to monitoring for more ofsuch input at 4720.

At 4730, the processor of the coordinating device may monitor the one ormore input devices for indications of entry of input indicative of therebeing a higher degree of difficulty in varying one or more particularfactors than for the other factors such that the processor receives anindication that the selected experiment design is to have a split-plotor a split-split-plot configuration. If, at 4732, such input isreceived, then at 4734, the processor may derive an additional degree oferror to which each such factor is to be subject, may present anindication of the additional default degree of error to prompt inputindicating a change thereto, and may return to monitoring for more ofsuch input at 4730. Again, as also previously discussed, followingreceipt of an indication of there being a different degree of difficultyin varying one or more particular factors, the processor 2550 may becaused to present additional prompts to additionally guide an operatorthrough providing separate additional parameters for whole plots and/orsubplots, such as the additional entry boxes 3716 by which separatedegrees of error may be provided for whole plots and/or subplots.

At 4740, the processor of the coordinating device may monitor the one ormore input devices for indications of entry of input indicative of achange to default a degree of error to which one or more of the factorsmay be subject, such as the separate degree of error that one or morefactors indicated as being more difficult to vary may be subject. If, at4742, such input is received, then at 4744, the processor may enact suchchange(s) to default degree(s) of error, and may return to monitoringfor more of such input at 4740.

At 4750, the processor of the coordinating device may receive anindication of a selection of a type of distribution for the randomgeneration of simulated data. At 4752, the processor may receive anindication of a quantity of iterations of the regression analysis,including the generation of simulated data, is to be performed.

At 4760, based on the parameters provided by the operator and/or fromany unchanged default parameters, the processor of the coordinatingdevice may be caused to generate a sequence of executable instructions(e.g., the executable instructions 2136) in a pre-selected programminglanguage for performing the specified quantity of iterations of theregression analysis. At 4762, the processor may also be caused togenerate and visually present a human readable form of a portion of theexecutable instructions that employs mathematical notation to expressesthe performance of the regression analysis (e.g., the human readableexpression 3722). As previously discussed, such a human readableexpression may include the values of the coefficients and/or anyintercept, may specify the selected type of distribution to be achievedin the random generation of simulated data, and/or may specify thequantity of iterations of the regression analysis to be performed.

At 4770, the processor of the coordinating device may monitor the one ormore input devices for indications of entry of input indicative of achange to one or more of the parameters and/or default parameters uponwhich the generation of the executable instructions was based. If, at4772, such input is received, then the processor may return to receivingand/or acting on the provision of revised ones of those parameters at4720 through 4752.

However, if at 4772, there are no such input, then at 4780, theprocessor of the coordinating device may proceed with either directlyexecuting the executable instructions to perform the specified quantityof iterations of the regression analysis, or may coordinate thedistribution and performance of the iterations of the regressionanalysis by multiple other processors and/or processor cores (e.g., theone or more processors 2350 and/or processor cores 2355). As previouslydiscussed, such other processors and/or processor cores may beincorporated into multiple node devices with which the coordinatingdevice may communicate via a network (e.g., the multiple node devices2300 via the network 2999). Alternatively, and as also previouslydiscussed, such other processor(s) and/or processor cores may also beincorporated into the coordinating device (e.g., as one or more GPUs).

Upon completion of the specified quantity of iterations of theregression analysis, the processor of the coordinating device mayvisually present the results thereof at 4782.

In various embodiments, the division of processing and/or storageresources among the devices, and/or the API architectures supportingcommunications among the devices, may be configured to and/or selectedto conform to any of a variety of standards for distributed processing,including without limitation, IEEE P2413, the ALLJOYN® standard, theIOTIVITY™ standard, etc. By way of example, a subset of API and/or otherarchitectural features of one or more of such standards may be employedto implement the relatively minimal degree of coordination describedherein to provide greater efficiency in parallelizing processing ofdata, while minimizing exchanges of coordinating information that maylead to undesired instances of serialization among processes. However,it should be noted that the parallelization of storage, retrieval and/orprocessing of data set portions of data set(s) are not dependent on, norconstrained by, existing API architectures and/or supportingcommunications protocols. More broadly, there is nothing in the mannerin which data set(s) may be organized in storage, transmission and/ordistribution via a network that is bound to existing API architecturesor protocols.

Some systems may use the HADOOP® framework, an open-source framework forstoring and analyzing big data in a distributed computing environment.Some systems may use cloud computing, which can enable ubiquitous,convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurablecomputing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications andservices) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimalmanagement effort or service provider interaction. Some grid systems maybe implemented as a multi-node HADOOP® cluster, as understood by aperson of skill in the art. The APACHE™ HADOOP® framework is anopen-source software framework for distributed computing.

Implementing some examples at least in part by using machine-learningmodels can reduce the total number of processing iterations, time,memory, electrical power, or any combination of these consumed by acomputing device when analyzing data. Some machine-learning approachesmay be more efficiently and speedily executed and processed withmachine-learning specific processors (e.g., not a generic CPU). Forexample, some of these processors can include a graphical processingunit (GPU), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), afield-programmable gate array (FPGA), a Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) byGoogle, and/or some other machine-learning specific processor thatimplements one or more neural networks using semiconductor (e.g.,silicon (Si), gallium arsenide (GaAs)) devices.

What has been described above includes examples of the disclosedarchitecture. It is, of course, not possible to describe everyconceivable combination of components and/or methodologies, but one ofordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinationsand permutations are possible. Accordingly, the novel architecture isintended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variationsthat fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

1. An apparatus comprising a processor and a storage to storeinstructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processorto perform operations comprising: receive, from an input devicecommunicatively coupled to the processor, indications of selection of aplurality of experiment designs to be compared, wherein: each experimentdesign of the plurality of experiment designs specifies a quantity ofruns of a test to perform a designed experiment; each experiment designis associated with a model of a system under evaluation; the modelassociated with each experiment design comprises multiple terms asinputs to the model; each term comprises at least one factor of multiplefactors that are each an input to the system; each factor of themultiple factors is identified by a factor identifier; and each term ofthe multiple terms is identified by a term identifier comprising text;for each factor of the multiple factors of the model associated with afirst experiment design of the plurality of designs, identify a matchingfactor of the multiple factors of the model associated with a secondexperiment design of the plurality of designs based on a factor type ofeach factor, wherein the factor type is selected from the groupconsisting of a categorical factor and a continuous factor; for eachcategorical factor of the multiple factors of the model associated withthe first experiment design, identify a matching factor of the multiplefactors of the model associated with the second experiment designadditionally based on quantity of levels of each factor; for each termof the multiple terms of the model associated with the first experimentdesign, identify a matching term of the multiple terms of the modelassociated with the second experiment design based on an order of eachterm; and present, on a display communicatively coupled to theprocessor, the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs and the identified matches betweenthe multiple responses of the first and second experiment designs. 2.The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the order of each term of the firstand second experiment designs is selected from a group consisting of: afirst order main effect term; a second order term; and a third orderterm; and the processor is caused to perform operations comprising:monitor the input device to enable reception of input that indicates acorrection to the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs; analyze the indicated correction todetermine whether the indicated correction specifies a match betweenterms of dissimilar order; and in response to a determination that theindicated correction specifies a match between terms of dissimilarorder, present an indication of incorrect input on the display.
 3. Theapparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is caused to performoperations comprising identify a match between a categorical factor ofthe model associated with the first experiment design and a categoricalfactor of the model associated with the second experiment designadditionally based on matches between the levels.
 4. The apparatus ofclaim 1, wherein the processor is caused to perform operationscomprising identify a match between a continuous factor of the modelassociated with the first experiment design and a continuous factor ofthe model associated with the second experiment design additionallybased on minimum and maximum values of continuous ranges of numericalvalues.
 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is caused toperform operations comprising: monitor the input device to enablereception of input that indicates a correction to the identified matchesbetween the multiple terms of the first and second experiment designs;analyze the indicated correction to determine whether the indicatedcorrection entails a match between factors of dissimilar factor type;and in response to a determination that the indicated correction entailsa match between factors of dissimilar factors type, present anindication of incorrect input on the display.
 6. The apparatus of claim1, wherein the processor is caused to perform operations comprising, foreach factor of the multiple factors of the model associated with thefirst experiment design, identify a matching factor of the multiplefactors of the model associated with the second experiment designadditionally based on the text of the factor identifier of each factor,and vocabulary data comprising a thesaurus of matches among words basedon meanings associated with the words.
 7. The apparatus of claim 1,wherein the processor is caused to perform operations comprising, foreach term of the multiple terms of the model associated with the firstexperiment design, identify a matching term of the multiple terms of themodel associated with the second experiment design additionally based onthe text of the term identifier of each term, and vocabulary datacomprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words.
 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein theprocessor is caused to perform operations comprising: monitor the inputdevice to enable reception of input that indicates a correction to theidentified matches between the multiple terms of the first and secondexperiment designs; and in response to a receipt, from the input device,of input indicating a correction to the identified matches between themultiple terms of the first and second experiment designs, performoperations comprising: store within the vocabulary data and as anexception to a match among words of the thesaurus, an indication of atleast one match between texts specified by the indicated correction;enact the indicated correction; and present, on the display, theidentified matches between the multiple terms of the first and secondexperiment designs and the identified matches between the multipleresponses of the first and second experiment designs after enactment ofthe indicated correction.
 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein: themodel associated with each experiment design comprises multipleresponses as outputs of the model; each response of the multipleresponses is identified by a response identifier; and the processor iscaused to perform operations comprising, for each response of themultiple responses of the model associated with the first experimentdesign, identify a matching response of the multiple responses of themodel associated with the second experiment design additionally based onthe text of the response identifier of each response, and vocabularydata comprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words.
 10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein theprocessor is caused to perform operations comprising: receive, from theinput device, indications of a selection of a term matched between thefirst and second experiment designs to add to a set of terms to beincluded in the comparison between the first and second experimentdesigns; analyze the models associated with the first and secondexperiment designs to determine whether the addition of the indicatedselected term to the set of terms causes the set of terms to becomeunsupportable by either of the first and second experiment designs; andin response to a determination that the addition of the indicatedselected term to the set of terms causes the set of terms to becomeunsupportable by either of the first and second experiment designs,perform operations comprising: present an indication of ineligible inputon the display; and remove the indicated selected term from the set ofterms to cause the set of terms to become supportable by both of thefirst and second experiment designs.
 11. A computer-program producttangibly embodied in a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium,the computer-program product including instructions operable to cause aprocessor to perform operations comprising: receive, from an inputdevice communicatively coupled to the processor, indications ofselection of a plurality of experiment designs to be compared, wherein:each experiment design of the plurality of experiment designs specifiesa quantity of runs of a test to perform a designed experiment; eachexperiment design is associated with a model of a system underevaluation; the model associated with each experiment design comprisesmultiple terms as inputs to the model; each term comprises at least onefactor of multiple factors that are each an input to the system; eachfactor of the multiple factors is identified by a factor identifier; andeach term of the multiple terms is identified by a term identifiercomprising text; for each factor of the multiple factors of the modelassociated with a first experiment design of the plurality of designs,identify a matching factor of the multiple factors of the modelassociated with a second experiment design of the plurality of designsbased on a factor type of each factor, wherein the factor type isselected from the group consisting of a categorical factor and acontinuous factor; for each categorical factor of the multiple factorsof the model associated with the first experiment design, identify amatching factor of the multiple factors of the model associated with thesecond experiment design additionally based on quantity of levels ofeach factor; for each term of the multiple terms of the model associatedwith the first experiment design, identify a matching term of themultiple terms of the model associated with the second experiment designbased on an order of each term; and present, on a displaycommunicatively coupled to the processor, the identified matches betweenthe multiple terms of the first and second experiment designs and theidentified matches between the multiple responses of the first andsecond experiment designs.
 12. The computer-program product of claim 11,wherein: the order of each term of the first and second experimentdesigns is selected from a group consisting of: a first order maineffect term; a second order term; and a third order term; and theprocessor is caused to perform operations comprising: monitor the inputdevice to enable reception of input that indicates a correction to theidentified matches between the multiple terms of the first and secondexperiment designs; analyze the indicated correction to determinewhether the indicated correction specifies a match between terms ofdissimilar order; and in response to a determination that the indicatedcorrection specifies a match between terms of dissimilar order, presentan indication of incorrect input on the display.
 13. Thecomputer-program product of claim 11, wherein the processor is caused toperform operations comprising identify a match between a categoricalfactor of the model associated with the first experiment design and acategorical factor of the model associated with the second experimentdesign additionally based on matches between the levels.
 14. Thecomputer-program product of claim 11, wherein the processor is caused toperform operations comprising identify a match between a continuousfactor of the model associated with the first experiment design and acontinuous factor of the model associated with the second experimentdesign additionally based on minimum and maximum values of continuousranges of numerical values.
 15. The computer-program product of claim11, wherein the processor is caused to perform operations comprising:monitor the input device to enable reception of input that indicates acorrection to the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs; analyze the indicated correction todetermine whether the indicated correction entails a match betweenfactors of dissimilar factor type; and in response to a determinationthat the indicated correction entails a match between factors ofdissimilar factor type, present an indication of incorrect input on thedisplay.
 16. The computer-program product of claim 11, wherein theprocessor is caused to perform operations comprising, for each factor ofthe multiple factors of the model associated with the first experimentdesign, identify a matching factor of the multiple factors of the modelassociated with the second experiment design additionally based on thetext of the factor identifier of each factor, and vocabulary datacomprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words.
 17. The computer-program product of claim 11,wherein the processor is caused to perform operations comprising, foreach term of the multiple terms of the model associated with the firstexperiment design, identify a matching term of the multiple terms of themodel associated with the second experiment design additionally based onthe text of the term identifier of each term, and vocabulary datacomprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words.
 18. The computer-program product of claim 17,wherein the processor is caused to perform operations comprising:monitor the input device to enable reception of input that indicates acorrection to the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs; and in response to a receipt, fromthe input device, of input indicating a correction to the identifiedmatches between the multiple terms of the first and second experimentdesigns, perform operations comprising: store within the vocabulary dataand as an exception to a match among words of the thesaurus, anindication of at least one match between texts specified by theindicated correction; enact the indicated correction; and present, onthe display, the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs and the identified matches betweenthe multiple responses of the first and second experiment designs afterenactment of the indicated correction.
 19. The computer-program productof claim 11, wherein: the model associated with each experiment designcomprises multiple responses as outputs of the model; each response ofthe multiple responses is identified by a response identifier; and theprocessor is caused to perform operations comprising, for each responseof the multiple responses of the model associated with the firstexperiment design, identify a matching response of the multipleresponses of the model associated with the second experiment designadditionally based on the text of the response identifier of eachresponse, and vocabulary data comprising a thesaurus of matches amongwords based on meanings associated with the words.
 20. Thecomputer-program product of claim 11, wherein the processor is caused toperform operations comprising: for each experiment design of theplurality of experiment designs, derive a statistical power for eachterm of the set of terms; for each term of the set of terms, generate agraph of statistical power versus quantity of runs that includes a plotof the term for each experiment design of the plurality of experimentdesigns; for each graph of statistical power versus quantity of runs,fit a curve to the plots therein; and present the graphs of statisticalpower versus quantity of runs generated for all of the terms of the setof terms at adjacent locations on the display.
 21. Acomputer-implemented method comprising: receiving, at a coordinatingdevice from an input device, indications of selection of a plurality ofexperiment designs to be compared, wherein: each experiment design ofthe plurality of experiment designs specifies a quantity of runs of atest to perform a designed experiment; each experiment design isassociated with a model of a system under evaluation; the modelassociated with each experiment design comprises multiple terms asinputs to the model; each term comprises at least one factor of multiplefactors that are each an input to the system; each factor of themultiple factors is identified by a factor identifier; and each term ofthe multiple terms is identified by a term identifier comprising text;for each factor of the multiple factors of the model associated with afirst experiment design of the plurality of designs, identifying amatching factor of the multiple factors of the model associated with asecond experiment design of the plurality of designs based on a factortype of each factor, wherein the factor type is selected from the groupconsisting of a categorical factor and a continuous factor; for eachcategorical factor of the multiple factors of the model associated withthe first experiment design, identify a matching factor of the multiplefactors of the model associated with the second experiment designadditionally based on quantity of levels of each factor; for each termof the multiple terms of the model associated with the first experimentdesign, identifying a matching term of the multiple terms of the modelassociated with the second experiment design based on an order of eachterm; and presenting, on a display communicatively coupled to thecoordinating device, the identified matches between the multiple termsof the first and second experiment designs and the identified matchesbetween the multiple responses of the first and second experimentdesigns.
 22. The computer-implemented method of claim 21, wherein: theorder of each term of the first and second experiment designs isselected from a group consisting of: a first order main effect term; asecond order term; and a third order term; and the method comprises:monitoring the input device to enable reception of input that indicatesa correction to the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs; analyzing the indicated correctionto determine whether the indicated correction specifies a match betweenterms of dissimilar order; and in response to a determination that theindicated correction specifies a match between terms of dissimilarorder, presenting an indication of incorrect input on the display. 23.The computer-implemented method of claim 21, comprising identifying amatch between a categorical factor of the model associated with thefirst experiment design and a categorical factor of the model associatedwith the second experiment design additionally based on matches betweenthe levels.
 24. The computer-implemented method of claim 21, comprisingidentifying a match between a continuous factor of the model associatedwith the first experiment design and a continuous factor of the modelassociated with the second experiment design additionally based onminimum and maximum values of continuous ranges of numerical values. 25.The computer-implemented method of claim 21, comprising: monitoring theinput device to enable reception of input that indicates a correction tothe identified matches between the multiple terms of the first andsecond experiment designs; analyzing the indicated correction todetermine whether the indicated correction entails a match betweenfactors of dissimilar factor type; and in response to a determinationthat the indicated correction entails a match between factors ofdissimilar factor type, presenting an indication of incorrect input onthe display.
 26. The computer-implemented method of claim 21,comprising, for each factor of the multiple factors of the modelassociated with the first experiment design, identifying a matchingfactor of the multiple factors of the model associated with the secondexperiment design additionally based on the text of the factoridentifier of each factor, and vocabulary data comprising a thesaurus ofmatches among words based on meanings associated with the words.
 27. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 21, comprising, for each term ofthe multiple terms of the model associated with the first experimentdesign, identifying a matching term of the multiple terms of the modelassociated with the second experiment design additionally based on thetext of the term identifier of each term, and vocabulary data comprisinga thesaurus of matches among words based on meanings associated with thewords.
 28. The computer-implemented method of claim 27, comprising:monitoring the input device to enable reception of input that indicatesa correction to the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs; and in response to a receipt, fromthe input device, of input indicating a correction to the identifiedmatches between the multiple terms of the first and second experimentdesigns, performing operations comprising: storing within the vocabularydata and as an exception to a match among words of the thesaurus, anindication of at least one match between texts specified by theindicated correction; enacting the indicated correction; and presenting,on the display, the identified matches between the multiple terms of thefirst and second experiment designs and the identified matches betweenthe multiple responses of the first and second experiment designs afterenactment of the indicated correction.
 29. The computer-implementedmethod of claim 21, wherein: the model associated with each experimentdesign comprises multiple responses as outputs of the model; eachresponse of the multiple responses is identified by a responseidentifier; and the method comprises, for each factor of the multiplefactors of the model associated with the first experiment design,identifying a matching response of the multiple responses of the modelassociated with the second experiment design additionally based on thetext of the response identifier of each response, and vocabulary datacomprising a thesaurus of matches among words based on meaningsassociated with the words.
 30. The computer-implemented method of claim21, comprising: for each experiment design of the plurality ofexperiment designs, generating a graph of all terms of the set of termsalong a horizontal axis versus all terms of the set of terms along avertical axis, wherein a degree of correlation of the pair of termsassociated with each intersection within the graph is visuallyindicated; and the visual indication of degree of correlation isselected from a group consisting of: a color; a degree of gray shading;and a pattern; and presenting, on the display, the graphs generated forall of the terms of the experiment designs of the plurality ofexperiment designs at adjacent locations on the display.